Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T12:10:14.180Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reforming State Pension Provision in ‘Liberal’ Anglo-Saxon Countries: Re-Commodification, Cost-Containment or Recalibration?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2012

David Lain ,
Sarah Vickerstaff  and
Wendy Loretto
David Lain
Affiliation:
Brighton Business School, University of Brighton E-mail: D.Lain@brighton.ac.uk
Sarah Vickerstaff
Affiliation:
School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research, University of Kent E-mail: S.A.Vickerstaff@kent.ac.uk
Wendy Loretto
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh Business School, University of Edinburgh E-mail: Wendy.Loretto@ed.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

There are good theoretical reasons for expecting pension reform in Anglo-Saxon countries to follow similar paths. Esping-Andersen (1990) famously identified these countries as belonging to the same ‘Liberal’ model of welfare, under which benefits, including pensions, are said to be residual and weakly ‘de-commodifying’, reducing individuals’ reliance on the market to a much lesser degree than elsewhere. Pierson (2001) has furthermore argued that because of path dependency welfare states are likely to follow established paths when dealing with ‘permanent austerity’. Following this logic, Aysan and Beaujot (2009) argue that pension reform in liberal countries has resulted in increasing re-commodification. In this paper, we review pension reforms in the UK, USA, Canada and New Zealand in the 2000s. We argue that because, in reality, the pension systems differed significantly at the point of reform, the paths followed varied considerably in terms of whether they focused on ‘re-commodification’, ‘cost-containment’ or ‘recalibration’.

Keywords

Pension ReformPensions Acts 2007 and 2008Liberalpath dependencyre-commodificationretrenchment
Type
Themed Section on Rethinking Retirement Incomes: Inequality and Policy Change in the UK and Anglo Saxon Countries
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , January 2013 , pp. 77 - 90
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aysan, M. F. and Beaujot, R. (2009) ‘Welfare regimes for aging populations: no single path for reform’, Population and Development Review, 35, 4, 701–20.Google Scholar
Béland, D. and Myles, J. (2005) ‘Stasis amidst change: Canadian pension reform in an age of retrenchment’, in Bonoli, G. and Shinkawa, T. (eds.), Ageing and Pension Reform around the World: Evidence from Eleven Countries, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 252–73.Google Scholar
Bozio, A., Crawford, R. and Tetlow, G. (2010) The History of State Pensions in the UK: 1948 to 2010, London: Institute for Fiscal Studies.Google Scholar
Bridgen, P. and Meyer, T. (2007) ‘The British pension system and social inclusion’, in Meyer, T., Bridgen, P. and Riedmuller, B. (eds.), Private Pensions Versus Social Inclusion? Non-State Provision for Citizens at Risk in Europe, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 47–78.Google Scholar
Castles, F. G. (ed.) (1993) Families of Nations: Patterns of Public Policy in Western Democracies, Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Castles, F. G. (2004) The Future of the Welfare State: Crisis Myths and Crisis Realities, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cates, J. R. (1983) Insuring Inequality: Administrative Leadership in Social Security, 1935–54, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curry, B. and Chase, S. (2012) ‘Conservative's budget to reset retirement at 67’, http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/conservatives-budget-to-reset-retirement-at-age-67/article2385085/ [accessed 28.05.2012].Google Scholar
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (2007) The Pensioners’ Incomes Series 2005/6 (Revised), London: Department for Work and Pensions.Google Scholar
Department for Work and Pensions (2008) ‘Projections of entitlement to income related benefits to 2050’, http://www.dwp.gov.uk/docs/projections-of-entitlement-toincomerelatedbenefitsjune2008.pdf [accessed 28.05.2012].Google Scholar
Department for Work and Pensions (2011) A State Pension for the 21st Century, Green Paper CM 8053, London: Department for Work and Pensions.Google Scholar
Elder, T. E. and Powers, E. T. (2006) ‘The incredible shrinking program’, Research on Aging, 28, 3, 341–58.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1999) Social Foundations of Postindustrial Societies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ginn, J. (2003) Gender, Pensions and the Lifecourse: How Pensions Need to Adapt to Changing Family Forms, Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
Hacker, J. S. (2006) The Great Risk Shift: The Assault on American Jobs, Families, Health Care, and Retirement and How You Can Fight Back, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harrington Meyer (forthcoming) ‘Changing social security in the US: rising insecurity?’, Social Policy and Society.Google Scholar
Harrington Meyer, M. and Herd, P. (2007) Market Friendly or Family Friendly?: The State and Gender Inequality in Old Age, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Hudson, J. and Lowe, S. (2004) Understanding the Policy Process: Analysing Welfare Policy and Practice, Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
Lain, D. (2009) ‘Healthy, wealthy and wise? Working past age 65 in the UK and USA’, unpublished D.Phil. thesis, Brighton: University of Sussex.Google Scholar
Lain, D. (2011) ‘Helping the poorest help themselves? Encouraging employment past 65 in England and the USA’, Journal of Social Policy, 40, 3, 493–512.Google Scholar
Lightman, E. S. and Riches, G. (2009) ‘Canada: one step forward, two steps back’, in Alcock, P. and Craig, G. (eds.), International Social Policy, Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 45–65.Google Scholar
Myles, J. (1998) ‘How to design a “Liberal” welfare state: a comparison of Canada and the United States’, Social Policy and Administration, 32, 4, 341–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myles, J. and Pierson, P. (2001) ‘The comparative political economy of pension reform’, in Pierson, P. (ed.), The New Politics of the Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 305–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2003) The Sources of Economic Growth in OECD Countries, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2009) Pensions at a Glance, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2011) Pensions at a Glance, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Overbye, E. (1997) ‘Mainstream pattern, deviant cases: the New Zealand and Danish pension systems in an international context’, Journal of European Social Policy, 7, 2, 101–17.Google Scholar
Palier, B. (2007) ‘Tracking the evolution of a single instrument can reveal profound changes: the case of funded pensions in France’, Governance, 20, 1, 85–107.Google Scholar
Pampel, F. C. (1998) Aging, Social Inequality, and Public Policy, Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar
Pensions Commission (2004) Pensions: Challenges and Choices, The First Report of the Pensions Commission, Norwich: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Pensions Commission (2005) A New Pension Settlement for the Twenty-First Century, The Second Report of the Pensions Commission, Norwich: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (1994) Dismantling the Welfare State?: Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrenchment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, P. (2001) ‘Coping with permanent austerity: welfare state restructuring in affluent democracies’, in Pierson, P. (ed.), The New Politics of the Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 410–56.Google Scholar
Price, D. (2007) ‘Closing the gender gap in retirement income: what difference will recent UK pension reforms make?’, Journal of Social Policy, 36, 4, 561–83.Google Scholar
Rashbrooke, G. (2009) ‘Simple, effective and (relatively) inexpensive: New Zealand retirement provision in the international context’, Social Policy Journal of New Zealand, 36, 97–110.Google Scholar
Rimlinger, G. V. (1971) Welfare Policy and Industrialization in Europe, America and Russia, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Rowlingson, K. (2002) ‘Private pension planning: the rhetoric of responsibility, the reality of insecurity’, Journal of Social Policy, 31, 4, 623–42.Google Scholar
St John, S. and Gran, B. (2001) ‘The world's social laboratory: women friendly aspects of New Zealand pensions’, in Ginn, J., Street, D. and Arber, S. (eds.), Women, Work and Pensions, Buckingham: Open University Press, pp. 199–215.Google Scholar
Waine, B. (2009) ‘New labour and pensions reform: security in retirement?’, Social Policy and Administration, 43, 7, 754–71.Google Scholar
Weaver, R. K. (2005) ‘Public pension reform in the United States’, in Bonoli, G. and Shinkawa, T. (eds.), Ageing and Pension Reform Around the World: Evidence from Eleven Countries, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 230–51.Google Scholar
Williamson, J. B. and Pampel, F. C. (1993) Old-Age Security in Comparative Perspective, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar