Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:07:28.226Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Barriers and Contradictions in the Resettlement of Single Homeless People

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2008

Jamie Harding  and
Andrea Willett
Jamie Harding
Affiliation:
Northumbria University, Division of Sociology and Criminology, Room 221 Lipman Building, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 8ST E-mail: jamie.harding@unn.ac.uk
Andrea Willett
Affiliation:
Northumbria University, Division of Sociology and Criminology, Room 221 Lipman Building, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 8ST
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Research in one local authority area suggests that a number of social policy difficulties and contradictions need to be resolved if single homeless people are to be resettled effectively. In particular, there are competing pressures on social housing providers, who are expected to meet the needs of socially excluded individuals while also creating sustainable communities and operating in a cost efficient manner. The government needs to clarify that meeting housing need is a priority for social landlords, and provide adequate funding for long-term support, if single homeless people are to find appropriate permanent accommodation.

Type
Articles
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 7 , Issue 4 , October 2008 , pp. 433 - 444
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

10 Downing Street (2007), Website of 10 Downing Street, http://www.number-10.gov.uk/output/Page8819.asp (accessed 5 November 2007).Google Scholar
Ambrosi, M. (2005), ‘Homeless overlooked in bid for sustainable communities’, Inside Housing, 25 February 2005.Google Scholar
Audit Commission (2007), website, http://www.audit-commission.gov.uk/housing/index.asp?CategoryID=english%5E1628andpage=index.aspandarea=hpsector (accessed 5 November 2007).Google Scholar
Audit Commission (2005), Supporting People, Wetherby: Audit Commission Publications.Google Scholar
Crane, M, Warnes, A, and Fu, R. (2006), ‘Developing homelessness prevention practice: combining research evidence and professional knowledge’, Health and Social Care in the Community, 14, 2, 156–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deacon, A., Vincent, J. and Walker, R. (1995), ‘Whose choice, hostels or homes? Policies for single homeless people’, Housing Studies, 10, 3, 345–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) (2008), National Indicators for Local Authorities and Local Authority Partnerships: Handbook of Definitions, London: DCLG.Google Scholar
Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) (2006a), Supporting Independence: Next Steps in Our Supporting People Strategy, Wetherby: DCLG Publications.Google Scholar
Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) (2006b), An Evaluation of the Supporting People Health Pilots, Wetherby: DCLG Publications.Google Scholar
Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) (2006c), Homelessness Code of Guidance for Local Authorities, Wetherby: DCLG Publications.Google Scholar
Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) (2006d), Allocation of Accommodation: Code of Guidance for Local Housing Authorities, Wetherby, DCLG Publications.Google Scholar
Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) (2007a), Providing Housing and Support: Lessons and Good Practice, London: DCLG.Google Scholar
Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) (2007b), ‘Housing research and statistics’, http://www.communities.gov.uk/housing/housingresearch/housingstatistics/housingstatisticsby/ (accessed 5 November 2007).Google Scholar
Ellison, N. and Pierson, C. (2003), ‘Introduction – developments in British social policy’, in Ellison, N. and Pierson, C. (eds), Developments in British Social Policy 2, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Foord, M. and Simic, P. (2001), ‘A sustainable approach to planning housing and social care: if not now, when?’, Health and Social Care in the Community, 9, 3, 168–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grant, C.(ed.) (1992), ‘Built to last?: reflections on British housing policy’, Roof Magazine, London: Shelter.Google Scholar
Great Britain Housing Act 1996: Elizabeth II, London: Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Great Britain Homelessness Act 2002: Elizabeth II, London: Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Great Britain House of Commons 2nd Standing Committee on Delegated Legislation (2002), Draft Homelessness (Priority Need for Accommodation) (England) Order 2002, 1 July 2002 c4.Google Scholar
Gruis, V., Nieboer, N. and Thomas, A. (2004), ‘Strategic asset management in the social rented sector: approaches of Dutch and English housing associations’, Urban Studies 41, 7, 1229–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guy Peters, B. (2003), ‘Governance and the welfare state’, in Ellison, N. and Pierson, C. (eds), Developments in British Social Policy 2, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hennessey, C. and Grant, D. (2006), ‘Developing a model of housing support: the evidence from Merseyside’, International Journal of Consumer Studies, 30, 4, 337–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Homelessness Directorate (2003), Supporting People: Guide to Accommodation and Support Options for Homeless Households, Wetherby: ODPM Publications.Google Scholar
Homelessness (Priority Need for Accommodation) (England) Order (2002) (SI2002/2051).Google Scholar
Homelessness Task Force (2001), Helping Homeless People: An Action Plan for Prevention and Effective Response, Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.Google Scholar
Hoyle, C. and Rose, D. (2001), ‘Labour, law and order’, The Political Quarterly, 72, 1, 76–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutson, S. and Liddiard, M. (1994), Youth Homelessness, Basingstoke: MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inside Housing (2007), ‘Council blacklists create huge housing underclass’, http://www.insidehousing.co.uk/news/article/?id=1449010 (Accessed 8 November 2007).Google Scholar
Kramer, B. and van Welie, T. (2001), ‘An asset liability management model for housing associations’, Journal of Property Investment and Finance 19, 6, 453–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, G. (2003), ‘“Difference” and social policy’, in Ellison, N. and Pierson, C. (eds), Developments in British Social Policy 2, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lomax, D. and Netto, G. (2007), Evaluation of Tenancy Sustainment Teams, London: DCLG.Google Scholar
MacGregor, S. (2003), ‘Social exclusion’, in Ellison, N. and Pierson, C. (eds), Developments in British Social Policy 2, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Malpass, P. (1990), Reshaping Housing Policy: Subsidies, Rents and Residualisation, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
McNaughton, C. (2005), Crossing the Continuum: Understanding the Routes out of Homelessness and Examining ‘What Works’, Glasgow: Simon Community.Google Scholar
Mind (2007), Website, http://www.mind.org.uk/Information/Booklets/Understanding/Understanding+dual+diagnosis.htm (accessed 5 November 2007).Google Scholar
Mullins, D. and Murie, A. (2006), Housing Policy in the UK, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Audit Office (2005), More than a Roof: Progress in Tackling Homelessness, London: Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM) (2003), ‘Sustainable communities: building for the future’, http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/communities/sustainablecommunitiesbuilding (accessed 5 November 2007).Google Scholar
Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM) (2005a), Sustainable Communities: Settled Homes, Changing Lives, a Strategy for Tackling Homelessness, London: ODPM.Google Scholar
Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM) (2005b), Review of Settled Housing for Former Rough Sleepers in London, Wetherby: ODPM.Google Scholar
Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM) (2004a), ‘What is supporting people?’, ODPM, London, http://www.spkweb.org.uk (accessed 5 November 2007).Google Scholar
Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM) (2004b), Effective Co-Operation in Tackling Homelessness: Nomination Agreements and Exclusions, London: ODPM.Google Scholar
Pleace, N. (2000), ‘The new consensus, the old consensus and the provision of services for people sleeping rough’, Housing Studies, 15, 4, 581–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randall, G. (1998), Rough Sleeping: A Review of the Research, London: Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (DETR).Google Scholar
Randall, G. and Brown, S. (2002), Helping Rough Sleepers off the Streets: A Report to the Homelessness Directorate, Wetherby: ODPM Publications.Google Scholar
Rosengard, A., Laing, I., Jackson, A. A. and Jones, N. (2001), Routes out of Homelessness, Edinburgh: Stationery Office Bookshop.Google Scholar
Rough Sleepers Unit (2001), Preventing Tomorrow's Rough Sleepers: A Good Practice Handbook, London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.Google Scholar
St Mungo's (2006), ‘The needs of homeless people’, http://www.mungos.org/facts/needs.shtml (accessed 5 November 2007).Google Scholar
Seal, M. (2005), Resettling Homeless People, Lyme Regis: Russell House Publishing.Google Scholar
Shelter (2006), ‘Allocations and access to social housing’, http://england.shelter.org.uk/policy/policy-961.cfm (accessed 5 November 2007).Google Scholar
Social Exclusion Unit (SEU) (1998), Rough Sleeping, London: Social Exclusion Unit.Google Scholar
Supporting People (2005), ‘Supporting people: interim financial package’, www.spkweb.org.uk (accessed 5 November 2007).Google Scholar
Supporting People (2006), ‘Directory of services’, www.spkweb.org.uk (accessed 5 November 2007).Google Scholar
Weaver, M. (2004), ‘Housing support for vulnerable cut by £85m’, The Guardian, 31 August, www.guardian.co.uk (accessed 5 November 2007).Google Scholar