Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:51:16.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Exploring the Ingredients of Success: Studying Trajectories of the Vulnerable Unemployed Who Have Entered Work or Education in Denmark

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2019

Sophie Danneris  and
Dorte Caswell
Sophie Danneris
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology and Social Work, Aalborg University E-mail: sophiedj@socsci.aau.dk
Dorte Caswell
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology and Social Work, Aalborg University E-mail: caswell@socsci.aau.dk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

When looking at clients with a long history of unemployment and substantial health and/or social problems, stories of success (in terms of moving from being on cash benefits to getting a job) are limited. Thus, when a client does manage to gain employment or enter education, it represents an unusual1 story of success seen from a political, organisational and individual perspective. In this article, we investigate empirically what can be learnt about current active labour market policies from these client cases. Methodologically this is explored through interviews with former clients who have managed to find a job despite dealing with complex health or social issues, and interviews with their former caseworkers. Thus, the article aims to provide insights into the crucial elements in making the move from vulnerable unemployed to being ready for a job, as well as finding it and keeping it.

Keywords

Stories of successwelfare to workvulnerable unemployed
Type
Themed Section: Rethinking Welfare-to-Work for the Long-Term Unemployed
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 18 , Issue 4 , October 2019 , pp. 615 - 629
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AMFORA, (2018) ‘Kommunale sagsbehandlings- og økonomisystemer’, AMFORA, Det Fælles Datagrundlag, Registeret for arbejdsmarkedsstatistik (RAM), DetailCOR, SU.Google Scholar
Andersen, N. and Larsen, F. (2018) Beskæftigelse for alle? ‐ en kommunale beskæftigelsespolitik på kontanthjælpsområdet siden 2000, København: Frydenlund Academia.Google Scholar
Andersen, N., Caswell, D. and Larsen, F. (2017) ‘A new approach to helping the unemployed: the promise of developing new knowledge in an interactive and collaborative process’, European Journal of Social Policy, 19, 4, 335–52.Google Scholar
Bordin, E. S. (1979) ‘The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance’, Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 16, 252–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bredgaard, T., Jørgensen, H., Kongshøj, P. M. and Rasmussen, S. (2017) Dansk Arbejdsmarkedspolitik, 2nd edn, København: DJØF Forlag.Google Scholar
Brodkin, E. (1997) ‘Inside the welfare contract: discretion and accountability in state welfare administration’, Social Service Review, 71, 1, 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caswell, D. (2019) ‘Talking policy into being: how street-level bureaucrats and vulnerable unemployed talk about labour market participation’, manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Caswell, D., Eskelinen, L. and Olesen, S. P.. (2013) ‘Identity work and client resistance underneath the canopy of active employment policy’, Qualitative Social Work, 12, 1, 8–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caswell, D., Larsen, J. E. and Sieling, S. M. (2015) ‘Cash benefit recipients: vulnerable or villains?’, in Torbenfeldt Bengtsson, T., Frederiksen, M. and Elm Larsen, J. (eds.), The Danish Welfare State: A Sociological Investigation, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, s. 217–34.Google Scholar
Caswell, D. and Larsen, F. (2017) ‘Frontline work in the delivery of Danish activation policies’, in van Berkel, R., Caswell, D., Kupka, P. and Larsen, F. (eds.), Frontline Delivery of Welfare-to-Work Policies in Europe: Activating the Unemployed, New York: Routledge, s. 163–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, T. and Nordentoft, M. (2011) Review om effekter af beskæftigelsesindsatser til personer med svær psykisk sygdom, http://www.bedrepsykiatri.dk/media/37888/reviewams6-10-2-pdf.pdf [accessed 19.09.18].Google Scholar
Danneris, S. (2016) Er du klar til at arbejde? Et kvalitativt forløbsstudie af forandringer i arbejdsmarkedsparatheden blandt kontanthjælpsmodtagere på kanten af arbejdsmarkedet, Aalborg Universitetsforlag, Ph.d.-serien for Det Samfundsvidenskabelige Fakultet, Aalborg Universitet.Google Scholar
Danneris, S. (2018) ‘Ready to work (yet)? Unemployment trajectories among vulnerable welfare recipients’, Qualitative Social Work, 17, 3, 355–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danneris, D., Dall, T., Caswell, D. and Olesen, S. P. (2017) Spot på samtalen: analyser af samtaler mellem aktivitetsparate kontanthjælpsmodtagere og beskæftigelsesmedarbejdere, 1. udg, Væksthusets Forskningscenter.Google Scholar
Deloitte (2018) ‘Evaluering af reform af førtidspension og fleksjob: hovedrapport’, https://star.dk/media/5870/hovedrapport-foep-fleks-160318-final.pdf [accessed 22.03.2019].Google Scholar
Employment Indicator Project (EIP) (2017) BIP Indikatorer og jobsandsynlighed, København: Vaeksthusets Forskningscenter, http://vaeksthusets-forskningscenter.dk/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/BIP-Indikatorer-og-jobsandsynlighed_-Hovedpointer.pdf [accessed 12.09.18].Google Scholar
Eskelinen, L. and Olesen, S. P. (2010) Beskæftigelsesindsatsen og dens virkninger set fra kontanthjælpsmodtagernes perspektiv, København: AKF.Google Scholar
Flyvbjerg, B. (1996) Rationalitet og magt. Det konkretes videnskab, Århus: Akademisk Forlag.Google Scholar
Haugli, L., Maeland, S. and Magnussen, L. H. (2011) ‘What facilitates return to work? Patients experiences 3 years after occupational rehabilitation’, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 21, 4, 573–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henry, B., Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., Langly, J. and Silva, P. A. (1994) ‘On the “remembrance of things past”: a longitudinal evaluation of the retrospective method’, Psychological Assessment, 6, 92–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen, F. (2013) ‘Active labour-market reform in Denmark: the role of governance in policy change’, in Brodkin, E. Z. and Marston, G. (eds.), Work and the Welfare State. Street-level Organizations and Workfare Politics, Washington DC: Georgetown University Press, 101–23.Google Scholar
Larsen, F., Caswell, D., Andersen, N. A., Bendix, H., Breidahl, K., Dall, T., Danneris, S., Monrad, M., Dahl-Nielsen, K. and Olesen, S. P. (2018) På vej med nye beskæftigelsesindsatser overfor udsatte borgere II. De næste resultater fra LISES-projektet, Aalborg Universitet, https://lisessite.files.wordpress.com/2018/06/resultatnotat-2-lises.pdf [accessed 11.09.2018].Google Scholar
Lustig, D. C., Strauser, D. R., Rice, N. D. and Rucker, T. F. (2002) ‘The relationship between working alliance and rehabilitation outcomes’, Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 46, 2, 24– 32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madsen, M. B., Nielsen, U. S., Ehrenreich, R., Habekost, A. M. and Ørnbøl, J. K. (2016) Fra udsat til ansat – set fra et arbejdsgiverperspektiv, København : Væksthusets Forskningscenter Google Scholar
Murphy, J., Murray, S., Chalmers, J., Martin, S. and Marston, G. (2011) Half a Citizen: Life on Welfare in Australia, Sydney: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Olesen, S. P. and Eskelinen, L. (2011) ‘Short narratives as a qualitative approach to effects of social work interventions’, Nordic Social Work Research, 1, 1, 61–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pruett, S. R., Swett, E., Chan, F., Rosenthal, D. A. and Lee, G. K. (2008) ‘Empirical evidence supporting the effectiveness of vocational rehabilitation’, Journal of Rehabilitation, 74, 2, 56– 63.Google Scholar
Ragin, C. and Amoroso, L. (2011) Construction Social Research, London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Rosholm, M., Sørensen, K. L. and Skipper, (2017) Sagsbehandlerens betydning for udsatte borgeres jobchancer, Beskæftigelses indikator projektet, Væksthusets Forskningscenter, http://vaeksthusets-forskningscenter.dk/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Rapport_BIP_Sagsbehandlerens-betydning.pdf [accessed 28.03.2019].Google Scholar
Vaeksthuset, (2017) Sagsbehandlerens betydning for udsatte borgeres jobchancer, København: Vaeksthusets Forskningscenter, http://vaeksthusets-forskningscenter.dk/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Rapport_BIP_Sagsbehandlerens-betydning.pdf [accessed 12.09.2018].Google Scholar
van Berkel, R., Caswell, D., Kupka, P. and Larsen, F. (2017) Frontline Delivery of Welfare-to-Work Policies in Europe: Activating the Unemployed, New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, S. L., Wessel, J. M. and Harder, H. G. (2011) ‘Workers’ perspectives on vocational rehabilitation services’, Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 55, 1, 46–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, B. and Fitzpatrick, S. (2018) Welfare Conditionality, Oxford: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, S. (2016) ‘Conceptualising the active welfare subject: welfare reform in discourse, policy and lived experience’, Policy and Politics, 44, 2, 235–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zacka, B. (2017) When the State Meets the Street. Public Service and Moral Agency, Cambridge: Belknap Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar