Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T14:23:58.845Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fair Cuts? The Impact of British Public Service Pension Reform on Workers in the Main Occupations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 October 2012

Paul Bridgen
Affiliation:
Faculty of Human and Social Sciences, University of Southampton E-mail: Paul.Bridgen@soton.ac.uk
Traute Meyer
Affiliation:
Faculty of Human and Social Sciences, University of Southampton E-mail: T.Meyer@soton.ac.uk

Abstract

Public service pensions have been a fundamental component of the British pension system in the post-war period and recent reform initiatives have caused political controversy. This article assesses the impact of the Conservative/Liberal government's public sector pension reform plans of 2011 for different public sector workers. It simulates their projected pension outcomes, assuming people contribute to the new system throughout their working lives. In particular, we examine the government's claim that the move away from final to average salary schemes will make pensions fairer for women and lower paid workers. The article shows that the reforms are indeed fair, if measured by the government's standards: retirement is delayed for all, but the lowest skilled and women lose least and some even gain higher pensions without paying proportionately more. Despite austerity, recent British pension reforms reflect a greater awareness of social inequality than many would expect and they have been built on more cross-party agreement than apparent at first sight.

Type
Themed Section on Rethinking Retirement Incomes: Inequality and Policy Change in the UK and Anglo Saxon Countries
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bridgen, P. (2010) ‘Towards a social democratic pension system? Assessing the significance of the 2007 and 2008 pension acts’, in Rummery, K., Greener, I. and Holden, C. (eds.), Social Policy Review: 22 Analysis and Debate in Social Policy, Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
Bridgen, P. and Meyer, T. (2005) ‘When do benevolent capitalists change their mind? Explaining the retrenchment of defined benefit pensions in Britain’, Social Policy and Administration, 39, 4, 764–85.Google Scholar
Bridgen, P. and Meyer, T. (2007) ‘Private pensions versus social inclusion? Three patterns of provison and their impact’, in Meyer, T., Bridgen, P. and Riedmüller, B. (eds.), Private Pensions versus Social Inclusion? Non-state Provision for Citizens at Risk in Europe, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Bridgen, P. and Meyer, T. (2011) ‘Exhausted voluntarism – the evolution of the British liberal pension regime’, in Ebbinghaus, B. (ed.), Varieties of Pension Governance: The Privatization of Pensions in Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 265–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chick, M. (1998) Industrial Policy in Britain 1945–1951: Economic Planning, Nationalisation and Labour Governments, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clasen, J. (2005) Reforming European Welfare States: Germany and the United Kingdom Compared, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, T. and Waine, B. (2010) Moral Outrage and Questionable Polarities: The Attack on Public Service Pensions, CRESC Working Paper Series, Working Paper No. 80, Manchester: CRESC.Google Scholar
Department for Communities and Local Government (2006) Where Next? Options for a New-Look Local Government Pension Scheme in England and Wales, London: Department for Communities and Local Government, www.communities.gov.uk [accessed 15.01.2012].Google Scholar
Disney, R., Emmerson, C. and Tetlow, G. (2009) ‘What is a public service pension worth?’, Economic Journal, 119, 541, F517F35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hannah, L. (1986) Reinventing Retirement: The Development of Occupational Pensions in Britain, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treasury, HM (2010) Budget 2010, London: HM Treasury, http://cdn.hm-treasury.gov.uk/junebudget_complete.pdf [accessed 28.01.2012].Google Scholar
Income Data Services (2006) Pension Scheme Design: An IDS Pensions Handbook, London: Income Data Services.Google Scholar
Independent Public Service Pensions Commission (IPSPC) (2010) Interim Report, 7 October, London: IPSPC.Google Scholar
Independent Public Service Pensions Commission (IPSPC) (2011) Final Report, 10 March, London: IPSPC.Google Scholar
Levy, J. D. (1999) ‘Vice into virtue? Progressive politics and welfare reform in continental Europe’, Politics and Society, 27, 2, 239–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leyland, J. (2011) ‘RPI versus CPI – the definitive account’, Significance, www.significancemagazine.org/details/webexclusive/1314363/RPI-versus-CPI—The-Definitive-Account.html [10.04.2012].Google Scholar
Local Government Pension Scheme (2011) ‘Employers submit pension proposals to Secretary of State’, http://www.lgps.org.uk/lge/core/page.do?pageId=13757792 [accessed 15.04.2012].Google Scholar
Meyer, T. (1997) Ungleich besser? Die ökonomische Unabhängigkeit von Frauen im Zeichen der Expansion sozialer Dienstleistungen, Berlin: edition sigma.Google Scholar
Meyer, T. and Bridgen, P. (2011) ‘Towards German liberalism and British social democracy: the evolution of two public-occupational pension regimes from 1945 to 2009’, in Clasen, J. (ed.), Converging Worlds of Welfare? British and German Social Policy in the 21st Century, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 157–79.Google Scholar
NEST (2012) www.nestpensions.org.uk/schemeweb/NestWeb/public/home/contents/homepage.html [accessed 10.04.2012].Google Scholar
OECD (2007) Pensions at a Glance: Public Policies across OECD Countries, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2012) JOBS03 Employee Jobs by Industry (GB Totals), www.ons.gov.uk/ons/index.html [accessed 10.04.2012].Google Scholar
Pensions Commission (2005) A New Pensions Settlement for the Twenty-first Century: The Second Report of the Pensions Commission, London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Pensions Policy Institute (2008) An Assessment of the Government's Reforms to Public Service Pensions, London: Pensions Policy Institute, www.pensionspolicyinstitute.org.uk [accessed 28.01.2012].Google Scholar
Russell, A. (1991) The Growth of Occupational Welfare in Britain, Avebury: Aldershot.Google Scholar
Thurley, D. (2010) Public Service Pension Reform – 1997–2010, London: House of Commons.Google Scholar
Thurley, D. (2012a) Public Service Pension Contributions, London: House of Commons.Google Scholar
Thurley, D. (2012b) Public Service Pension Reform – 2010 Onwards, London: House of Commons.Google Scholar