Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T15:41:55.971Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction: ‘New’ Welfare in Practice: Trends, Challenges and Dilemmas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2013

Marion Ellison  and
Menno Fenger
Marion Ellison
Affiliation:
Sociology and Social Policy, Queen Margaret University Edinburgh E-mail: mellison@qmu.ac.uk
Menno Fenger
Affiliation:
Department of Public Administration, Erasmus University Rotterdam E-mail: fenger@fsw.eur.nl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

European welfare states have a tradition of compensating for social risks. But across Europe, remarkable transformations may be observed that shift the focus from a needs/rights based compensatory approach towards a more individualistic ‘social risk management’ approach to welfare (see Schmid, 2006; Abrahamson, 2010). The basic idea of social risk management is that citizens have their own responsibility for preventing social risks. The ‘new’ welfare state mirrors this approach by adopting the role of equipping individual citizens for this task. The concept of the ‘new welfare state’ has been discussed under different labels, including ‘positive welfare’ (Giddens, 1998), ‘enabling welfare’ (Gilbert, 2002), ‘new welfare’ (Taylor-Gooby, 2008) and ‘social investment state’ (Engelen et al., 2007).

Type
Themed Section on ‘New’ Welfare in Practice: Trends, Challenges and Dilemmas
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 12 , Issue 4 , October 2013 , pp. 547 - 552
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrahamson, P. (2010) ‘European welfare states beyond neoliberalism: toward the social investment state’, Development and Society, 39, 1, 61–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, J. G. and Guillemard, A.-M. (2006) ‘Conclusion: policy change, welfare regimes and active citizenship’, in Andersen, J. G., Guillemard, A.-M., Jensen, P. H. and Pfau-Effinger, B. (eds.), The Changing Face of Welfare. Consequences and Outcomes from a Citizenship Perspective, Bristol: The Policy Press, pp. 257–71.Google Scholar
Beck, U. (2006) ‘Living in the world risk society’, Economy and Society, 35, 1, 329–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deacon, B. (2001) ‘International organisations, the EU and global social policy’, in Sykes, R., Palier, B. and Prior, P. (eds.), Globalisation and European Welfare States: Challenges and Change, Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 59–76.Google Scholar
Engelen, E., Hemerijck, A. and Trommel, W. (eds.) (2007) Van sociale bescherming naar sociale investering [From Social Protection to Social Investment], Den Haag: Lemma.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1992) ‘The making of a social democratic welfare state’, in Misgeld, K., Molin, K. and Amark, K. (eds.), Creating Social Democracy: A Century of the Social Democratic Labor Party in Sweden, University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, pp. 35–66.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1998) The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Gilbert, N. (2002) Transformations of the Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grusky, D. and Kricheli-Katz, T. (2012) The New Gilded Age: The Critical Inequality Debates of Our Time, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hay, C. (2005) ‘Too important to leave to the economists? The political economy of welfare retrenchment’, Social Policy and Society, 4, 2, 197–205.Google Scholar
Hemerijck, A. (2012) Changing Welfare States, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lister, R. (2003) ‘Investing in the citizen-workers of the future: transformations in citizenship and the state under New Labour’, Social Policy and Administration, 37, 5, 427–43.Google Scholar
Lorenz, W. (2001) ‘Social work responses to New Labour in Continental European countries’, British Journal of Social Work, 31, 4, 595–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenz, W. (2008) ‘Towards a European model of social work’,Australian Social Work, 61, 1, 7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Midgley, J. (1999) ‘Growth, redistribution, and welfare: toward social investment’, Social Service Review, 73, 1, 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarro, V. (1998) ‘Neo liberalism, globalization, unemployment, inequalities and the welfare state’, International Journal of Health Services, 28, 4, 607–82.Google Scholar
Pugh, R. and Gould, N. (2000) ‘Globalisation, social work, and social welfare’, European Journal of Social Work, 3, 2, 123–38.Google Scholar
Rhodes, M. (1996) ‘Globalization and the West European welfare states: a critical review of recent debates’, Journal of European Social Policy, 6, 4, 305–28.Google Scholar
Schmid, G. (2006) ‘Social risk management through transitional labour markets’, Socio-Economic Review, 4, 1, 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, M. M., Haux, T. and Pudney, S. (2012) Can Improving UK Skill Levels Reduce Poverty and Income Inequality by 2020, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, P. (2008) ‘The new welfare state settlement in Europe’, European Societies, 10, 1, 3–24.Google Scholar
Trevellion, S. (1997) ‘The globalisation of european social work’, Social Work in Europe, 4, 1, 1–8.Google Scholar