Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T06:10:29.748Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Political Economy of Governance Capacity and Institutional Change: The Case of Basic Income Security Reform in European Welfare States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2019

Louise Haagh
Louise Haagh*
Affiliation:
Department of Politics, University of York, UK E-mail: louise.haagh@york.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article will situate public debates about – and experiments in features of – basic income within European countries in the context of welfare state crisis and change. Treating access to basic income security as a policy problem, I argue basic income policy debate highlights the need for multi-level and multifactorial analysis of public governance capacity as a key factor in driving the relationship of basic income with welfare state transformation. Drawing on the cases within this themed section, I attempt to tease out what comparatively are long-run conditions for basic income within state and society, and what are the political and institutional trade-offs at the current juncture. Exploring contributing determinants of governance corrosion and adaptation of public economic security structures under globalisation contributes to deepen our understanding of contemporary patterns of institutional change.

Keywords

Governance capacityliberalisationinstitutional changedemocratisationbasic income experiments
Type
Themed Section: Basic Income in European Welfare States: Opportunities and Constraints
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , April 2019 , pp. 243 - 263
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersson, J.-O. and Kangas, K. (2005) ‘Universalism in the age of workfare. Attitudes to basic income in Sweden and Finland’, in Kildal, N. and Kuhnle, S. (eds.), Normative Foundations of the Welfare State: the Nordic Experience, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Blanchflower, D. and Machin, S. (2014) ‘Falling real wages’, Centre Piece Spring, http://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/cp422.pdf [accessed 10.12.2018].Google Scholar
Bronk, R. (2009) The Romantic Economist: Imagination in Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clasen, J. (2001) ‘Social insurance and the contributory principle: a paradox in contemporary British social policy,’ Social Policy and Administration, 35, 6, 641–57.Google Scholar
Clasen, J. and Clegg, D. (2012) ‘Adapting labour market policy to a transformed employment structure: the politics of “triple integration”’, in Bonoli, G. and Natali, D. (eds.), The Politics of the New Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Columbino, U., Locatelli, M., Narazani, E. and O'Donoghue, C. (2010) ‘Alternative basic income mechanisms: an evaluation exercise with a microeconometric model’, Basic Income Studies, 5, 1, 1–16.Google Scholar
Coyle, D. (2017) ‘How to have a productive Brexit’, Prospect Magazine, 13 November.Google Scholar
Cruddas, J. and Kibasi, T. (2016) ‘A universal basic mistake’, Prospect Magazine, 16 June.Google Scholar
De Wispelaere, J. (2016) ‘The struggle for strategy: on the politics of the basic income proposal’, Politics, 36, 2, 131–41.Google Scholar
De Wispelaere, J., Halmetoja, A. and Pulkka, V.-V. (2018) ‘The rise (and fall) of the basic income experiment in Finland’, CESifo Forum, 19, 3, 15–9.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1999) Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
European Commission (2018) http://ec.europa.eu/citizens-initiative/public/basic-facts [accessed 05.12.2018].Google Scholar
European Social Survey (2017) Assessing Support for Universal Basic Income, http://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/findings/singleblog.html?a=/findings/blog/essblog0010.html [accessed 11.10.2018].Google Scholar
Fetzer, T. (2018) ‘Did austerity cause Brexit?’, https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/research/workingpapers/2018/twerp_1170_fetzer.pdf [accessed 10.10.2018].Google Scholar
Finegold, D. and Soskice, D. (1988) ‘The failure of training in Britain: analysis and prescription’, in Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 4, 3, 21–53.Google Scholar
Groot, L., Muffels, R. and Verlaat, T. (2018) ‘Welfare states’ social investment strategies and the emergence of Dutch experiments on a minimum income guarantee’, Social Policy and Society, doi: 10.1017/S1474746418000283.Google Scholar
Haagh, L. (2011) ‘Basic income, social democracy, and control over time’, Policy and Politics, 39, 1, 43–66.Google Scholar
Haagh, L. (2012) ‘Democracy, public finance, and property rights in economic stability’, Polity, 44, 4, 542–87.Google Scholar
Haagh, L. (2015) ‘Alternative social states and the basic income debate: institutions, inequality and human development’, Basic Income Studies, 10, 1, 45–81.Google Scholar
Haagh, L. (2017) ‘Basic income as a pivoting reform’, Nature Human Behaviour, 1, Article No. 0125, 12th June.Google Scholar
Haagh, L. (2018) ‘The developmental social contract and basic income in Denmark’, Social Policy and Society, doi: 10.1017/S1474746418000301.Google Scholar
Haagh, L. (2019a) The Case for Universal Basic Income, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Haagh, L. (2019b) ‘Public ownership within varieties of capitalism: regulatory foundations for welfare and freedom’, in Special Issue on Public Ownership in the Twenty-First Century, International Journal of Public Policy, in press.Google Scholar
Hacker, J. S., Pierson, P. and Thelen, K. (2015) ‘Drift and conversion: hidden faces of institutional change’, in Mahoney, J. and Thelen, K. (eds.), Advances in Comparative Historical Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, P. A. and Soskice, D. (eds.) (2001) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Halmetoja, A., De Wispelaere, J. and Perkiö, J. (2018) ‘A policy comet in Moominland? Basic Income in the Finnish welfare state’, Social Policy and Society, doi: 10.1017/S1474746418000258.Google Scholar
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2017) Global Financial Stability Report, October 2017: Is Growth at Risk?Google Scholar
International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (2013) Think Differently, http://www.ifrc.org/PageFiles/134339/1260300-Economic%20crisis%20Report_EN_LR.pdf [accessed 01.12.2018].Google Scholar
Jordan, B. (2012) ‘The low road to basic income? Tax-benefit integration in the UK’, Journal of Social Policy, 41, 1, 1–17, doi 10.1017/S0047279411000353.Google Scholar
Knotz, C. M. (2018) ‘A rising workfare state?’, Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy, 34, 2, 99–108.Google Scholar
Kongshøj-Madsen, P. (2003) ‘Flexicurity through labour market policies and institutions in Denmark,’ in Auer, P. and Cazes, S. (eds.), Employment Stability in an Age of Flexibility, Geneva: International Labour Organisation.Google Scholar
Lee, S. (2018) ‘Attitudes toward universal basic income and welfare state in Europe: a research note’, Basic Income Studies, 13, 1, 101–9.Google Scholar
Martin, J. (2016) ‘Universal credit to basic income: a politically feasible transition?’, Basic Income Studies, 11, 2, 97–131, doi:https://doi.org/10.1515/bis-2015-0028.Google Scholar
Martinelli, L. and Pearce, N. (2018) ‘Basic income in the UK: assessing prospects for reform in an age of austerity’, Social Policy and Society, doi: 10.1017/S147474641800026X.Google Scholar
Martinelli, L. (forthcoming) ‘A basic income trilemma: affordability, adequacy, and the advantages of universal and unconditional welfare’, Journal of Social Policy.Google Scholar
McConnell, A. (2010) ‘Policy success, policy failure and grey areas in-between,’ Journal of Public Policy, 30, 3, 345–62.Google Scholar
Millar, J. and Bennett, F. (2016) ‘Universal credit: assumptions, contradictions and virtual reality’, Social Policy and Society, 16, 2, 169–82.Google Scholar
Mosley, H. (2012) ‘Accountability in Decentralised Employment Service Regimes’, OECD Local Economic and Employment Development (LEED) Working Papers, 2012/10, OECD Publishing, https://doi.org/10.1787/5k98sbxn9wbw-en [accessed 15.09.2018].Google Scholar
Noguera, J. (2018) ‘The political debate on basic income and welfare reform in Spain’, Social Policy and Society, doi: 10.1017/S1474746418000271.Google Scholar
Pagano, U. (1991) ‘Property rights, asset specificity and the division of labour under alternative capitalist relations’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 15, 3, 315–42.Google Scholar
Pulkka, V. V. (2018) ‘Finland shares unconditional money, but the public view remains polarised’, IPR Blog, Institute for Policy Research, University of Bath, http://blogs.bath.ac.uk/iprblog/2018/01/23/finland-shares-unconditional-money-but-the-public-view-remains-polarised/ [accessed 23.08.2018].Google Scholar
RSA (2018) Modern Economic Insecurity and Basic Income, August.Google Scholar
Rueda, D. (2007) Social Democracy Inside Out: Government Partisanship, Insiders, and Outsiders in Industrialized Democracies, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (1998) Development as Freedom, Oxford; Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skelcher, C., Klijn, E. H., Kübler, D., Sorensen, E. and Sullivan, H. (2011) ‘Explaining the democratic anchorage of governance networks’, Administrative Theory and Praxis, 33, 1, 7–38, https://doi.org/10.2753/ATP1084-1806330100.Google Scholar
Schickler, E. (2001) Disjointed Pluralism, Institutional Innovation and the Development of the US Congress, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Steinmo, S. (2010) The Evolution of Modern States, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Streeck, W. and Thelen, K. (2005) ‘Introduction: institutional change in advanced political economies’, in Beyond Continuity – Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stovicek, K. and Turrini, A. (2012) ‘Benchmarking unemployment benefits in the EU’, IZA Policy Paper No. 43, June.Google Scholar
The Observer (2018) ‘Unofficial demands’ in ‘Paris under Siege once more, but massive police show of force keeps lid on’, by Kim Willsher, 9 December.Google Scholar
Thelen, K. (2014) Varieties of Liberalization and the New Politics of Solidarity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thelen, K. (2004) How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Comparative-Historical Perspective, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van der Heijden, J. (2015) ‘What “works” in environmental policy-design? Lessons from experiments in the Australian and Dutch building sectors’, Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 17, 1, 44–64.Google Scholar
van der Heijden, J. (2016) ‘Looking differently at legal change: layering, conversion, drift, displacement and exhaustion in the development of Dutch construction regulation’, KLRI Journal of Law and Legislation, 6, 1, 82–111.Google Scholar
Van Parijs, P. (1995) Real Freedom for All, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van Parijs, P. (1996) ‘Basic income and the two dilemmas of the welfare state’, The Political Quarterly, 67, 1, 63–6.Google Scholar