Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T14:35:26.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reciprocity in the Co-Production of Public Services: The Role of Volunteering through Community Time Exchange?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2018

Gemma Burgess  and
Daniel Durrant
Gemma Burgess
Affiliation:
Cambridge Centre for Housing and Planning Research, Department of Land Economy, University of Cambridge E-mail: Glb36@cam.ac.uk
Daniel Durrant
Affiliation:
Bartlett School of Planning, University College London E-mail: daniel.durrant@ucl.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Time Credits are a form of community currency based upon the reciprocal exchange of time and represent an interpretation of ‘time banking’ by a UK social enterprise, Spice. This article sets out the contribution made by research on Time Credits to the theory and practice of co-production in public services. Time Credits are intended to improve wellbeing through volunteering and ultimately increase economic participation. There is a focus on communities exhibiting high levels of deprivation within a small Cambridgeshire town (Wisbech, UK) which is geographically isolated and characterised by low-skilled, agri-food based employment opportunities that attracted high levels of inward migration from the A8 EU accession countries. In separating the rhetoric from the reality of co-production, the research aims to shed some light upon the extent to which such initiatives can realistically engender a shift towards a more reciprocal economy in the context of an ongoing programme of fiscal austerity.

Keywords

Co-productionsocial enterprisereciprocityausterity
Type
Articles
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , April 2019 , pp. 171 - 186
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barber, B. (2003 [1984]) Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
BBC/Experian (2010) ‘Spending cuts to hit north harder’, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-11233799 [accessed 18.01.2017].Google Scholar
Boyle, D. (2010) ‘Local economics and co-production’, Development, 53, 3, 319–24.Google Scholar
Brandsen, T. and Pestoff, V. (2006) ‘Co-production, the third sector and the delivery of public services’, Public Management Review, 8, 4, 493–501.Google Scholar
Bovaird, T. (2007) ‘Beyond engagement and participation - user and community coproduction of services’, Public Administration Review, 67, 846–60.Google Scholar
Burgess, G. (2016) Evaluating the Public Health Outcomes of the Cambridgeshire Time Credits Project: Interim Report. Cambridge: Cambridge Centre for Housing and Planning Research.Google Scholar
Cabinet Office (2011) Giving White Paper, London: Cabinet Office HM Government.Google Scholar
Cahn, E. (2004) No More Throw-away People: The Co-Production Imperative, 2nd edn, Washington DC: Essential Books.Google Scholar
Cambridgeshire County Council and Cambridge and Peterborough Clinical Commissioning Group, Cambridgeshire JSNA: Summary Report 2014/15, Cambridgeshire County Council and Cambridge and Peterborough Clinical Commissioning Group.Google Scholar
Casiday, R., Kinsman, E., Fisher, C. and Bambra, C. (2008) Volunteering and Health: What Impact Does it Really Have?, London: Volunteering England, file:///C:/Users/sm725/Documents/NIHR/Resources/Conseptual%20framework/Volunteering%20England_Volunteering%20and%20Health.pdf [accessed 20.01.2016].Google Scholar
Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) (2011) A Plain English Guide to the Localism Act, London: DCLG, https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/5959/1896534.pdf [accessed 26.05.2017].Google Scholar
Evers, A. (2005) ‘Mixed welfare systems and hybrid organizations: changes in the governance and provision of social services’, International Journal of Public Administration, 28, 9–10, 737–48.Google Scholar
Evers, A. and Laville, J. L. (2004) The Third Sector in Europe, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Fotaki, M. (2015) ‘Co-production under the financial crisis and austerity: a means of democratizing public services or a race to the bottom?’, Journal of Management Inquiry, 24, 4, 433–38.Google Scholar
Glynos, J. and Speed, E. (2012) ‘Varieties of co-production in public services: time banks in a UK health policy context’, Critical Policy Studies, 6, 402–33.Google Scholar
Gregory, L. (2014) ‘Resilience or resistance? Time banking in the age of austerity’, Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 22, 2, 171–83.Google Scholar
Graeber, D. (2001) Towards an Anthropological Theory of Value: The False Coin of our Own Dreams, London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Haffenden, F., O'Neill, R. and Dunling-Hall, S. (2015) ‘The migrant population across Cambridge & Peterborough: data, views and issues’, A Presentation to the PCC Eastern European Economic Migrants JSNA and CCC Migrant Populations JSNA Stakeholder Scoping Workshop, 14 October 2015, http://www.slideshare.net/CambridgeshireInsight/pcc-eastern-european-economic-migrants-jsna-and-ccc-migrant-populations-jsna-stakeholder-scoping-workshop-14-october-2015 [accessed 18.06.2016].Google Scholar
Hirst, P. (1994) Associative Democracy: New Forms of Economic and Social Governance, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Jenkinson, C., Dickens, A., Jones, K., Thompson-Coon, J., Taylor, R., Rogers, M., Bambra, C., Lang, I. and Richards, S. (2013) ‘Is volunteering a public health intervention? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the health and survival of volunteers’, BMC Public Health, 13, 773.Google Scholar
Keleman, M., Mangan, A. and Moffat, S. (2017) ‘More than a ‘little act of kindness’? Towards a typology of volunteering as unpaid work, Sociology, 1–18.Google Scholar
Krausova, A. and Vargas-Silva, C. (2013) East of England: Census Profile, The Migration Observatory at the University of Oxford, http://www.migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/resources/briefings/england-census-profile/ [accessed 18.06.2016].Google Scholar
Lawrence, F. (2016) ‘The gangsters on England's doorstep’, The Guardian, 11 May, http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/may/11/gangsters-on-our-doorstep [accessed 18.06.2016].Google Scholar
Leadbeater, C. (1997) ‘The Rise of the Social Entrepreneur’, London: Demos, https://www.demos.co.uk/files/theriseofthesocialentrepreneur.pdf [accessed 26.05.2017].Google Scholar
Lowndes, V. and Pratchett, L. (2012) ‘Local governance under the Coalition Government: austerity, localism and the “Big Society”’, Local Government Studies, 38, 1, 21–40.Google Scholar
Mauss, M. (1954 [2001]) The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Morrow-Howell, N., Hong, S. and Tang, F. (2009) ‘Who benefits from volunteering? Variations in perceived benefits’, The Gerontologist, 49, 1, 91–102.Google Scholar
Mulgan, G. (2016) Foreword to: ‘Positive Change in Challenging Times: How Spice Time Credits are Creating System Change’, http://www.justaddspice.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Final-System-Change-Report_Screen-Version_single.pdf [accessed 22.03.2017].Google Scholar
Needham, C. (2008) ‘Realising the potential of co-production: negotiating improvements in public services’, Social Policy and Society, 7, 2, 221–31.Google Scholar
Needham, C. and Carr, S. (2009) Co-production: an emerging evidence base for adult social care transformation, SCIE Research Briefing 31, London: Social Care Institute for Excellence.Google Scholar
New Economics Foundation (2008) Co-Production: A Manifesto for Growing the Core Economy, London: NEF.Google Scholar
Offe, C. (2009) ‘Governance: an “empty signifier”’, Constellations, 16, 4, 150–62.Google Scholar
Parks, R. B., Baker, P. C., Kiser, L., Oakerson, R., Ostrom, E., Ostrom, V., Percy, S.L., Vandivort, M.B., Whitaker, G.P. and Wilson, R. (1981) ‘Consumers as coproducers of public services: some economic and institutional considerations’, Policy Studies Journal, 9, 7, 1001–11.Google Scholar
Pestoff, V. (2006) ‘Citizens and co-production of welfare services’, Public Management Review, 8, 4, 503–19.Google Scholar
Polyani, K. (1944) The Great Transformation, Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Smith, M. J. (2010) ‘From big government to big society: changing the state-society balance’, Parliamentary Affairs, 63, 4, 818–33.Google Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, P. and Stoker, G. (2011) ‘The coalition programme: a new vision for Britain or politics as usual?’, Political Quarterly, 82, 1, 4–15.Google Scholar
Walzer, M. (1988) ‘Socializing the welfare state’, in Gutmann, A. (ed.), Democracy and the Welfare State, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Walzer, M. (1991) ‘The civil society argument’, Statsvetenskaplig Tidskrift, 94, 1–11.Google Scholar
Wisbech 2020 (2016) Fenland's Game Changer – A Garden Town?, http://www.wisbech2020vision.co.uk/CHttpHandler.ashx?id=12727&p=0 [accessed 15.06.2016].Google Scholar
Williams, Z. (2012) The Shadow State: A Report about the Outsourcing of Public Services, London: Social Enterprise UK.Google Scholar