Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T09:20:01.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Social Citizenship, Inequality and Homeownership. Postwar Perspectives from the North of Europe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2019

Jardar Sørvoll  and
Viggo Nordvik
Jardar Sørvoll
Affiliation:
Oslo Metropolitan University, NOVA (Norwegian Social Research), E-mail: jarso@oslomet.no
Viggo Nordvik
Affiliation:
Oslo Metropolitan University, NOVA (Norwegian Social Research), E-mail: viggo.nordvik@oslomet.no
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article, we analyse the social distribution of residential property in Norway post-1945 in light of the concept of social citizenship. Drawing on data from censuses and tax registers, we examine the social stratification of owner-occupation and housing wealth in a Nordic nation of homeowners. Our study shows that residential property and housing wealth is very unevenly distributed, and that the share of low-income homeowners decreased markedly after 1990. The implications of these findings are discussed with reference to three different conceptions of citizenship: the socio-liberal, the republican and the libertarian. Our main argument is that the falling rate of low-income owner-occupation constitutes an erosion of social citizenship viewed from the socio-liberal and republican conception of citizenship. This follows from theoretical arguments and empirical studies linking homeownership to positive welfare outcomes, such as civic engagement and social integration. The latter is arguably particularly true in some high-homeownership countries, such as Norway, where owner-occupation is the cultural norm and rental housing is associated with low quality and insecurity.

Keywords

Homeownershiphousing policyinequalityNorwaysocial citizenship
Type
Themed Section: Property and Social Citizenship
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , April 2020 , pp. 293 - 306
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aarland, K. and Reid, C. (2018) ‘Homeownership and residential stability: does tenure really make a difference?’, International Journal of Housing Policy, 19, 2, 165–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Artle, R. and Varaiya, P. (1978) ‘Life cycle consumption and homeownership’, Journal of Economic Theory, 18, 1, 38–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arundel, R. (2017) ‘Equity inequity: housing wealth inequality, inter and intra-generational divergences, and the rise of private landlordism’, Housing, Theory and Society, 34, 2, 176–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bengtsson, B. (2001) ‘Housing as a social right: implications for welfare state theory’, Scandinavian Political Studies, 4, 24, 255–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloze, G. and Skak, M. (2012) ‘Housing tenure and psychological distress’, International Journal of Housing Policy, 12, 4, 471–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bø, E. E. (2019) ‘Taxation of housing: killing several birds with one stone’, The review of Income and Wealth, https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dagger, R. (2002) ‘Republican citizenship’, in Engin, F. I. and Turner, B. S. (eds.), Handbook of Citizenship Studies, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Departementene (2015) Strategi for boligmarkedet, Oslo: Departementene.Google Scholar
Dewilde, C. and Ronald, R. (2017) ‘Why housing wealth and welfare?’, in Dewilde, C. and Ronald, R. (eds.), Housing Wealth and Welfare, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiPasquale, D. and Glaeser, E. L. (1999) ‘Incentives and social capital: are homeowners better citizens?’, Journal of Urban Economics, 45, 2, 354–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzpatrick, S. and Watts, B. (2016) ‘Competing visions: security of tenure and the welfarisation of English social housing’, Housing Studies, 32, 8, 1021–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzpatrick, S., Bengtsson, B. and Watts, B. (2014) ‘Rights to housing: reviewing the terrain and exploring a way forward’, Housing, Theory and Society, 31, 4, 447–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forrest, R. (2018) ‘Housing and asset based stratification in the enrichment economy’, Critical Housing Analysis, 5, 2, 4–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forrest, R. and Hirayama, Y. (2018) ‘Late home ownership and social re-stratification’, Economy and Society, 47, 2, 257–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galster, G. and Wessel, T. (2019) ‘Reproduction of social inequality through housing: a three-generational study from Norway’, Social Science Research, 78, 119–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galster, G., Andersson, R. and Musterd, S. (2014) ‘Are males’ incomes influenced by the income mix of their male neighbors? Explorations into nonlinear and threshold effects in Stockholm’, Housing Studies, 30, 2, 315–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, J. D. and Skak, M. (2008) ‘Adaptation investments and homeownership’, Journal of Housing Economics, 17, 1, 102–15.10.1016/j.jhe.2007.09.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirayama, Y. (2012) ‘The shifting housing opportunities of younger people in Japan’s home-owning society’, in Ronald, R. and Elsinga, M. (eds.), Beyond Home Ownership. Housing, Welfare and Society, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Johansson, H. and Hvinden, B. (2013) ‘Towards a post-Marshallian framework for the analysis of social citizenship’, in Adalbert, E. and Guillemard, A-M. (eds.), Social Policy and Citizenship: The Changing Landscape, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kemp, P. A. (2011) ‘Low-income tenants in the private rental housing market’, Housing Studies, 26, 7–8, 1019–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, P. A. and Kofner, S. (2010) ‘Contrasting varities in private renting: England and Germany’, International Journal of Housing Policy, 10, 4, 379–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiøsterud, T. (2005) Hvordan målene ble nådd: hovedlinjer og erfaringer i norsk boligpolitikk, Oslo: NOVA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohl, S. and Sørvoll, J. (2019) ‘Varieties of social democracy and cooperativism. Explaining the divergence in housing regimes in Nordic and German speaking countries’, unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Langsholt, H-C. W. (2019) Å leie der mange vil eie, Oslo: the University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Lindblad, M. R. and Quercia, R. G. (2015) ‘Why is homeownership associated with nonfinancial benefits? A path analysis of competing mechanisms’, Housing Policy Debate, 25, 2, 263–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lund, A. (2018) ‘Den norske sykepleierindeksen’, Tidsskrift for boligforskning, 1, 1, 67–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maclennan, D. and Miao, J. (2017) ‘Housing and capital in the 21st Century’, Housing, Theory and Society, 34, 2, 127–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, T. H. (1950/2009) ‘Citizenship and social class’, in Mansa, J. and Sauder, M. (eds.), Inequality and Society. Social Science Perspectives on Social Stratification, New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
McKee, K. (2012) ‘Young people, homeownership and future welfare’, Housing Studies, 27, 6, 853–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D. (2000) Citizenship and National Identity, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Monkerud, L., Astrup, K. and Nordvik, V. (2018) Omfanget av vanskeligstilte på boligmarkedet – en kapabiltetstilnærming, Oslo: NIBR.Google Scholar
Norwegian Government (2003–2004) St. Meld. nr. 23, https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/stmeld-nr-23-2003-2004-/id197927/sec1 [accessed 10.08.2019].Google Scholar
Ortalo-Magne, F. and Rady, S. (1999) ‘Boom in, bust out: young households and the housing price cycle’, European Economic Review, 43, 4, 755–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piketty, T. (2014) Capital in the Twenty-First Century, London: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reiersen, E. and Thue, E. (1996) De tusen hjem. Den norske stats Husbank 1946-1996, Oslo: Ad Notam Gyldendal.Google Scholar
Revold, M. K. (2019) Under halvparten av husholdningene med lav inntekt eier sin egen bolig, Oslo: SSB.Google Scholar
Revold, M. K., Sandvik, L. and With, M. L. (2018) Bolig og boforhold – for befolkningen og utsatte grupper, Oslo: Statistisk Sentralbyrå.Google Scholar
Sandlie, H. C. (2013) ‘Leiemarkedet’, in Sandlie, H. C. and Grødem, A. S. (eds.), Bolig og Levekår i Norge 2012, Oslo: NOVA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandlie, H. C. and Gulbrandsen, L. (2017) ‘The social homeownership model – the case of Norway’, Critical Housing Analysis, 4, 1, 52–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sørvoll, J. (2011) Norsk boligpolitikk i forandring 1970–2010. Dokumentasjon og debatt, Oslo: NOVA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sørvoll, J. (2014) The Politics of Cooperative Housing in Norway and Sweden 1960-1990 (PhD-thesis), Oslo: the University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Sørvoll, J. (2019) ‘The dilemmas of means-tested and market-oriented social rented housing: municipal housing in Norway’, Critical Housing Analysis, 6, 1, 51–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torgersen, U. (1996) Omstridt boligskatt, Oslo: INAS.Google Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, P., Hvinden, B., Mau, S., Leruth, B., Schøyen, M. A. and Gyory, A. (2019) ‘Moral economies of the welfare state: a qualitative comparative study’, Acta Sociologica, https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699318774835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vassenden, A. (2014) ‘Homeownership and symbolic boundaries: exclusion of disadvantaged non-homeowners in the homeowner nation of Norway’, Housing Studies, 29, 6, 760–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vassenden, A. and Lie, T. (2013) ‘Telling others how you live – refining Goffman’s stigma theory through an analysis of housing strugglers in a homeowner nation’, Symbolic Interaction, 36, 1, 78–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar