Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:28:16.952Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Systematic Research Synthesis to Inform Policy, Practice and Democratic Debate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 June 2002

David Gough  and
Diana Elbourne
David Gough
Affiliation:
Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, London Email: d.gough@ioe.ac.uk
Diana Elbourne
Affiliation:
Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, London Email: d.gough@ioe.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Issues surrounding the role and provision of evidence to inform policy and practice have become topical and problematic. The context of these controversies is discussed, with particular emphasis on systematic approaches to synthesising research evidence. We contrast the ‘positivist’ emphasis with interpretative qualitative synthesis, and suggest that many of the viewpoints have become unnecessarily and unhelpfully polarised. The methods for systematic research syntheses will vary as they depend on the question being asked. The process is transparent, allowing readers to see how conclusions have been reached, and forms the basis of reviews which can be updated to help provide sustainable and relevant evidence.

Type
Brief Report
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 1 , Issue 3 , July 2002 , pp. 225 - 236
Copyright
© 2002 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)