Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:42:14.869Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

First in Flight: Desertion as Politics in the North Carolina Confederate Army

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Katherine A. Giuffre
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In place of open mutiny, [powerless groups] prefer desertion. . . . They make use of implicit understandings and informal networks. . . . When such stratagems are abandoned in favor of more quixotic action, it is usually a sign of great desperation.

Scott (1985: xvi)

At the beginning of the Civil War, few suspected how brutal and bloody the conflict would prove to be. During the first months of the war, thousands of men and boys from North Carolina rushed to enlist. As deaths from disease and battle mounted dramatically, soldiers who had agreed to serve for one, two, or three years found themselves legally compelled to stay even after their enlistment was up, and those who had stayed home enlisted reluctantly under the threat of the draft (Wright 1978). Detained in the Confederate army often by threat of imprisonment or even death (ibid.), obliged to fight for a cause that appeared increasingly to be contrary to their own interests (Bardolph 1964), watching as the wealthy plantation owners resigned their commissions and bowed out (Tatum 1934), thousands of soldiers took up one strategy of resistance to the war: desertion. Of the 120,000 North Carolinians who enlisted to fight in the Confederate army, an estimated 12,000 deserted before the war was over. This study will test the hypothesis that desertion was a form of resistance to the war by a relatively powerless group, the small farmers. The central focus of this article will be the predictors of desertion. Of the estimated 10% of the Confederate soldiers from North Carolina who deserted from the army, the majority were small-scale farmers who had long opposed the wealthy elites on a variety of issues.

Type
Articles
Information
Social Science History , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , Summer 1997 , pp. 245 - 263
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 1997 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Auman, William T. (1981) “The desertion of Randolph County troops during the Civil War.” Unpublished manuscript, University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Bardolph, Richard (1964) “Inconstant rebels: Desertion of North Carolina troops in the Civil War.” North Carolina Historical Review 41: 163-89.Google Scholar
Bearman, Peter (1991) “Desertion as localism: Army unit solidarity and group norms in the U.S. Civil War.” Social Forces 70: 321-42.Google Scholar
Butts, Donald C. (1981) “The ‘irrepressible conflict’: Slave taxation and North Carolina’s gubernatorial election of 1860.” North Carolina Historical Review 58: 44–66.Google Scholar
Crow, Jeffrey J. (1989) “The Whiskey Rebellion in North Carolina.” North Carolina Historical Review 66: 1–28.Google Scholar
Escott, Paul D. (1985) Many Excellent People: Power and Privilege in North Carolina, 1850-1900. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Escott, Paul D., and Crow, Jeffrey J. (1986) “The social order and violent disorder: An analysis of North Carolina in the Revolution and the Civil War.” Journal of Southern History 52: 373–402.Google Scholar
Glad, Betty (1990) Psychological Dimensions of War. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Goff, Jerry Christopher (1987) “The geographic origins of North Carolina enlistments in the war between the states.” M.A. thesis, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Inscoe, John C. (1984) “Mountain masters: Slaveholding in western North Carolina.” North Carolina Historical Review 61: 143-73.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, Thomas E. (1979) “‘Thunder from the mountains’: Thomas Lanier Clingman and the end of Whig supremacy in North Carolina.” North Carolina Historical Review 56: 366-95.Google Scholar
Lefler, Hugh T. (1959) North Carolina: History, Geography, and Government. Yonkers-on-Hudson, NY: World Book Company.Google Scholar
Manarin, Louis, and Jordan, Weymouth T. (1965-88) North Carolina Troops, 1861-1865: A Roster, vols. 1-11. Raleigh, NC: Department of Archives and History.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Memory F. (1965) Legal Aspects of Conscription and Exemption in North Carolina, 1861-1865. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. (1985) Weapons of the Weak: Everday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Tatum, Georgia Lee (1934) Disloyalty in the Confederacy. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1860) Eighth Census of the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Wallenstein, Peter (1984) “Rich man’s war, poor man’s fight: Civil War and the transformation of public finance in Georgia.” Journal of Southern History 50: 15–42.Google Scholar
Wright, Gavin (1978) The Political Economy of the Cotton South: Households, Markets, and Wealth in the Nineteenth Century. New York: Norton.Google Scholar