Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:11:34.744Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Family Control, Bridal Pregnancy, and Illegitimacy

An Event History Analysis in Leuven, Belgium, 1846–1856

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Jan Van Bavel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Extramarital pregnancy and illegitimate childbearing have been interpreted by historians as well as sociologists basically in terms of deviant behavior and lack of social control (Tranter 1985; Blaikie 1995). While society has looked at procreation outside marriage as a moral lapse, social science has regarded it in terms of deviancy, as “something which interrupted the proper functioning of social processes, and revealed a failure of social control, the control of individual behavior by family and kin, by political and educational authority” (Laslett 1980a: 1–2).Within this framework, interpretations of the “illegitimacy explosion” of the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries have almost invariably referred toweakening social control as a result of industrialization, urbanization, and migration. In the 1970s, the debate on the rise of illegitimacy was centered on Edward Shorter's contention that women's emancipation produced rising extramarital sexual activity. This article does not reopen that dispute (see Shorter 1971, 1975: 255–68; Tilly et al. 1976; Lee 1977; Fairchilds 1978; Alter 1988). Rather, it starts from the common ground underlying the different interpretations, which associates adolescent extramarital pregnancy with social isolation. Scholars have argued that migration and new living and working conditions often led to separation from the family and local community. This change would have resulted in the collapse of traditional social control, making premarital intercourse more likely.

Type
Articles
Information
Social Science History , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , Fall 2001 , pp. 449 - 479
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 2001 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achen, C. H. (1982) Interpreting and Using Regression. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Aldrich, J. H., and Nelson, F. D. (1984) Linear Probability, Logit, and Probit Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Allison, P. D. (1984) Event History Analysis: Regression for Longitudinal Event Data. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Alter, G. (1988) Family and the Female Life Course: The Women of Verviers, Belgium, 1849–1880. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Berlanstein, L. R. (1980) “Illegitimacy, concubinage, and proletarianization in a French town, 1760–1914.” Journal of Family History 5 (winter): 360–74.Google Scholar
Berry, W. D. (1993) Understanding Regression Assumptions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Blaikie, A. (1993) Illegitimacy, Sex, and Society: Northeast Scotland, 1750-1900. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Blaikie, A. (1995) “Motivation and motherhood: Past and present attributions in the reconstruction of illegitimacy.” Sociological Review 43(4): 641–57.Google Scholar
Caldwell, J. C. (1981) “The mechanisms of demographic change in historical perspective.” Population Studies 35(1): 5–27.Google Scholar
Caspard, P. (1974) “Conceptions prénuptiales et développement du capitalisme dans la principauté de Neufchâtel (1678-1820).” Annales,Economies, Sociétés, Civilisations 29(4): 989–1008.Google Scholar
Clerkx, L. E. (1988) “Vaders en dochters in sprookjes.” Amsterdams Sociologisch Tijdschrift 15(2): 266–90.Google Scholar
De Belder, J. (1976) “Beroep of bezit als criterium voor de sociale doorsnede: Een aanzet tot uniformisering van reconstructiemethoden.” Tijdschrift voor sociale geschiedenis 6(4): 257–79.Google Scholar
De Vos, R., and Van der Haegen, H. (1980) “Ruimtelijke en sociale patronen van de choleraepidemie te Leuven in 1849,” in Jaarboek van de Geschieden Oudheidkundige Kring voor Leuven en omgeving. Leuven: Geschieden Oudheidkundige Kring voor Leuven en omgeving: 37–71.Google Scholar
Fairchilds, C. (1978) “Female sexual attitudes and the rise of illegitimacy: A case study.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 8(4): 627–67.Google Scholar
Fiers, M.-C. (1984) “Paupers en pauperisme in de Sint-Gertrudisparochie te Leuven (1836-1860).” Master's thesis, University of Leuven.Google Scholar
Gordon, L., and O'Keefe, P. (1984) “Incest as a form of family violence: Evidence from historical case records.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 46(1): 27–34.Google Scholar
Gutmann, M. P., and van de Walle, E. (1978) “New sources for social and demographic history: The Belgian population registers.” Social Science History 2(2): 121–43.Google Scholar
Hajnal, J. (1983) “Two kinds of pre-industrial household formation system,” in Wall, R., Robin, J., and Laslett, P. (eds.) Family Forms in Historic Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 65–104.Google Scholar
Haller, M. (1981) “Marriage, women, and social stratification: A theoretical critique.” American Journal of Sociology 86(4): 766–95.Google Scholar
Jacobs, M. (1988) “Charivari in Vlaanderen,” in Top, S. and Manet, D. (eds.) Verliefd verloofd getrouwd. Brussels: ASLK: 49–58.Google Scholar
Lampard, R. (1995) “Parents' occupations and their children’s occupational attainment: A contribution to the debate on the class assignment of families.” Sociology 29(4): 715–28.Google Scholar
Laslett, P. (1980a) “Introduction: Comparing illegitimacy over time and between cultures,” in Laslett, P., Oosterveen, K., and Smith, R. M. (eds.) Bastardy and Its Comparative History. London: Edward Arnold: 1–65.Google Scholar
Laslett, P. (1980b) “The bastardy prone sub-society,” in Laslett, P., Oosterveen, K., and Smith, R. M. (eds.) Bastardy and Its Comparative History. London: Edward Arnold: 217–46.Google Scholar
Leboutte, R., and Obotela, R. (1988) “Les registres de population en Belgique: Genèse d'une technique administrative et d'une source de démographie historique,” in Handelingen van de Koninklijke Commissie voor Geschiedenis, vol.134: 285–305.Google Scholar
Lee, W. R. (1977) “Bastardy and the socioeconomic structure of south Germany.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 7(3): 40–25.Google Scholar
Lesthaeghe, R. (1977) The Decline of Belgian Fertility, 1800-1970. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Magits, M. (1975) Demografische en sociale structuren te Leuven (1846-1860): Bijdrage tot de stadsgeschiedenis in de 19de eeuw. Brussels: V.U.B., Centrum Sociale Structuren en Economische Conjunctuur.Google Scholar
Matovic, M. R. (1980) “Illegitimacy and marriage in Stockholm in the nineteenth century,” in Laslett, P., Oosterveen, K., and Smith, R. M. (eds.) Bastardy and Its Comparative History. London: Edward Arnold: 336–45.Google Scholar
Matthijs, K. (1996) “Age at first marriage in three different socioeconomic regions in Belgium.” Paper presented at the European Social Science History conference, Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands, 9-11 May 1996.Google Scholar
Matthijs, K., Van Bavel, J., and Van de Velde, I. (1997) Leuven in de negentiende eeuw. De bevolking: Een spiegel van het dagelijkse leven. Leuven: ACCO.Google Scholar
Mitterauer, M. (1983) Ledige Mütter: Zur Geschichte unehelicher Geburten in Europa. Munich: Verlag C. H.Beck.Google Scholar
Mitterauer, M., and Sieder, R. (1982) The European Family: Patriarchy to Partnership from the Middle Ages to the Present. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Oosterveen, K., and Smith, R. M. (1980) “Bastardy and the family reconstitution studies of Colyton, Aldenham, Alcester, and Hawkshead,” in Laslett, P., Oosterveen, K., and Smith, R. M. (eds.) Bastardy and Its Comparative History. London: Edward Arnold: 94–121.Google Scholar
Oris, M. (1989) “Fécondité légitime et illégitime: Les indigents de Huy (Belgique) de 1815à 1875.” Annales de Démographie historique 141–55.Google Scholar
Peeters, H. (1996) De beroepenclassificatie, toegepast op de huwelijksakten van Leuven, Bierbeek en Aalst 1800-1913. Leuven: K.U. Leuven, Departement Sociologie, Afdeling Gezin, Bevolking en Gezondheid.Google Scholar
Reay, B. (1996) Microhistories: Demography, Society, and Culture in Rural England, 1800-1930. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Seccombe, W. (1992) A Millennium of Family Change: Feudalism to Capitalism in North-western Europe. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Shorter, E. (1971) “Illegitimacy, sexual revolution, and social change in modern Europe.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 2: 237–72.Google Scholar
Shorter, E. (1975) The Making of the Modern Family. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Srole, C. (1986) “‘Beyond one's control’: Life course and the tragedy of class, Boston, 1800 to 1900.” Journal of Family History 11(1): 43–54.Google Scholar
Steverlynck, C. (1997) Kleine martelaars: Een historisch document over misbruikte kinderen, kindermishandeling, incest en prostitutie. Antwerp: Icarus.Google Scholar
Stewart, S. (1980) “Bastardy and the family reconstitution studies of Banbury and Hartland,” in Laslett, P., Oosterveen, K., and Smith, R. M. (eds.) Bastardy and Its Comparative History. London: Edward Arnold: 122–40.Google Scholar
Stone, L. (1979) The Family, Sex, and Marriage in England 1500-1800. Abridged edition. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Storme, H. (1992) Die trouwen wilt voorsichtelijck: Predikanten en moralisten over de voorbereiding op het huwelijk in de Vlaamse bisdommen (17e-18e eeuw). Leuven: Universitaire Pers Leuven.Google Scholar
Tilly, L. A., Scott, J. W., and Cohen, M. (1976) “ Women's work and European fertility patterns.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 6(3): 447–76.Google Scholar
Tranter, N. L. (1985) “Illegitimacy in nineteenth-century rural Scotland: A puzzle resolved?” International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 5(2): 33–46.Google Scholar
Uytterhoeven, R. (1995) “Kantwerksters te Leuven.” Vlaams-Brabant 4: 8–14.Google Scholar
Van Bavel, J. (1998) “Economic crisis,illegitimacy, and first marriage before the fertility transition: A cohort case study in Leuven, Belgium, 1846-1866.” Paper presented at theEuropean Social Science History Association conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 5-7 March.Google Scholar
van de Walle, E. (1976) “Household dynamics in a Belgian village, 1847-1866.” Journal of Family History 1(1): 80–94.Google Scholar
Van Isacker, K. (1978) Mijn land in de kering 1830-1980. Deel 1: Een ouderwetse wereld 1830-1914. Antwerp and Amsterdam: De Nederlandsche Boekhandel.Google Scholar
van Poppel, F. (1992) Trouwen in Nederland. Een historisch-demografische studie van de 19e en vroeg 20e eeuw. The Hague: NIDI.Google Scholar
Van't Dack, A. (1972) “Het Leuvens hinterland op basis van migratie en pendel: Evolutie van 1829 tot 1961.” Tijdschrift van de Belgische Vereniging voor Aardrijkskundige studies 41(1): 105–32.Google Scholar
Watkins, S. C. (1986) “Regional patterns of nuptiality in Western Europe, 1870-1960,” in Coale, A. J. and Watkins, S. C. (eds.) The Decline of Fertility in Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Watkins, S. C., and Gutmann, M. P. (1983) “Methodological issues in the use of population registers for fertility analysis.” Historical Methods 16(3): 109–20.Google Scholar
Wilson, A. (1989) “Illegitimacy and its implications in mid-eighteenth-century London: The evidence of the foundling hospital.” Continuity and Change 4(1): 103–64.Google Scholar
Yamaguchi, K. (1991) Event History Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar