Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:37:09.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Identifying Shifts in Policy Regimes

Cluster and Interrupted Time-Series Analyses of U.S. Income Taxes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

John L. Campbell  and
Michael Patrick Allen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

One of the mainstays of political sociology and political science for generationshas been debate about the conditions under which one policy regime—that is, a distinct mix of public policies—is replaced by another. For instance, a vast literature seeks to identify the factors that caused the shift from orthodox to Keynesian policy regimes in the United States and Europe after the Second World War, as well as the shift during the 1980s to more conservative neoliberal policy regimes (e.g., Campbell 1998; Gourevitch 1986; Hall 1989, 1992;Weir and Skocpol 1985). Similarly, scholars have argued about whether the process through which regime shifts occur is a slow and incremental one, driven by bureaucratic inertia, muddling through, and path-dependent constraints, or a rapid and abrupt one, sparked by cataclysmic events like war that trigger sharp breaks with past policies (e.g., Baumgartner and Jones 1993; Hall 1993; Krasner 1984; Lindblom 1959; Pierson 1993, 1994). Regime shifts have also captured the imagination of historical sociologists who have recognized that history is marked by critical turning points that differentiate among relatively stable time periods and that this requires scholars to carefully identify historically specific patterns among variables (Abbott 1988, 1992, 1997; Isaac 1997).

Type
Research Article
Information
Social Science History , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , summer 2001 , pp. 187 - 216
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, A. (1988) “Transcending general linear reality.” Sociological Theory 6:169–86.Google Scholar
Abbott, A. (1992) “From causes to events.” Sociological Methods and Research 20(4):428–55.Google Scholar
Abbott, A. (1997) “On the concept of the turning point.” Comparative Social Research 16: 85–105.Google Scholar
Aldenderfer, M., and Blashfield, R. (1984)Cluster Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, M. P., and Campbell, J. L. (1994) “State revenue extraction from different income groups: Variations in tax progressivity in the United States, 1916-1986.” American Sociological Review 59(2):169–86.Google Scholar
Bailey, K. D. (1975) “Cluster analysis,” in Heise, D. R. (ed.) Sociological Methodology 1975. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass: 59–128.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, F., and Jones, B. (1993) Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Beck, N. (1983) “Time-varying parameter regression models.” American Journal of Political Science 27: 557–600.Google Scholar
Box, G. E. P., and Tiao, J. (1975) “Intervention analysis with applications to economic and environmental problems.”Journal of the American Statistical Association 70: 70–92.Google Scholar
Braun, R. (1975) “Taxation, sociopolitical structure, and state-building: Great Britain and Brandenburg-Prussia,” in Tilly, C. (ed.) The Formation of National States in Western Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press:243–327.Google Scholar
Brownlee, W. E. (1990) “Economists and the formation of the modern tax system in the United States: The World War I crisis,” in Furner, M. and Supple, B. (eds.) The State and Economic Knowledge. New York: Cambridge University Press:401–35.Google Scholar
Brownlee, W. E. (1996) Federal Taxation in America. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bureau of Applied Economics (1920) Standards of Living. Washington, DC: Bureau of Applied Economics.Google Scholar
Burnham, W. D. (1981) “The 1980 earthquake: Realignment, reaction or what?” in Ferguson, T. and Rogers, J. (eds.) The Hidden Election. New York: Pantheon: 98–140.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. L. (1993) “The state and fiscal sociology.” Annual Review of Sociology 19: 163–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, J. L. (1998) “Institutional analysis and the role of ideas in political economy.” Theory and Society 27: 377–409 Google Scholar
Campbell, J. L., and Allen, M. P. (1994) “The political economy of revenue extraction in the modern state: A time-series analysis of U.S. income taxes, 1916-1986.” Social Forces 72 (3): 643–69.Google Scholar
Edsall, T. B. (1984) The New Politics of Inequality. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Goldstein, J. (1993) Ideas, Interests, and American Trade Policy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gourevitch, P. (1986) Politics in Hard Times. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, P. A. (1989) The Political Power of Economic Ideas. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, P. A. (1992) “The movement from Keynesianism to monetarism: Institutional analysis and British economic policy in the 1970s,” in Steinmo, S., Thelen, K., and Longstreth, F. (eds.) Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press:90–113.Google Scholar
Hall, P. A. (1993) “Policy paradigms, social learning and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain.” Comparative Politics 25(3):275–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartigan, J. A. (1975) Clustering Algorithms. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Hibbs, D. (1977) “On analyzing the effects of policy interventions: Box-Jenkins and Box-Tiao vs. structural equation models,” in Heise, D. (ed.) Sociological Methodology 1977. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass: 137–79.Google Scholar
Higgs, R. (1987) Crisis and Leviathan: Critical Episodes in the Growth of American Government. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hoyt, E., Reid, M., McConnell, J., and Hooks, J. (1954)Income and Its Uses. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Issac, L. W. (1997) “Transforming localities: Reflections on time, causality, and narrative in contemporary historical sociology.” Historical Methods 30(1): 4–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Issac, L. W., and Griffin, L. (1989)“Ahistoricism in time-series analyses of historical process: Critique, redirection, and illustrations from U.S. labor history.” American Sociological Review 54:873–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Issac, L. W., Carlson, S. M., and Mathis, M. P. (1994)“Quality of quantity in comparative/historical analysis: Temporally changing wage labor regimes in the United States and Sweden,” in Janoski, T. and Hicks, A. M. (eds.) The Comparative Political Economy of the Welfare State. New York: Cambridge University Press:54–92.Google Scholar
Issac, L. W., and Leicht, K. T. (1997) “Regimes of power and the power of analytic regimes: Explaining U.S. military procurement Keynesianism as historical process.” Historical Sociology 30 (1): 28–45.Google Scholar
Issac, L. W., Street, D. A., and Knapp, S. J. (1994)“Analyzing historical contingency with formal methods: The case of the ‘relief explosion’ and 1968.” Sociological Methods and Research 23(1):114–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, D. (1988) “Corporate economic power and the state: A longitudinal assessment of two explanations.” American Journal of Sociology 93:852–81.Google Scholar
Janoski, T., and Hicks, A. M. (1994)“Methodological innovations in comparative political economy: An introduction,” in Janoski, T. and Hicks, A. M. (eds.) The Comparative Political Economy of the Welfare State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 1–30.Google Scholar
Janoski, T., and Isaac, L. W. (1994)“Introduction to time-series analysis,” in Janoski, T. and Hicks, A. M. (eds.) The Comparative Political Economy of the Welfare State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press:31–53.Google Scholar
Kiser, E. (1994) “Markets and hierarchies in early modern fiscal systems: A principal-agent analysis.” Politics and Society 22(3):285–316.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, H. (1992) “Political regime change: Structure and process-driven explanations.” American Political Science Review 86(4):1028–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasner, S. D. (1984) “Approaches to the state: Alternative conceptions and historical dynamics.” Comparative Politics 16(2):223–46.Google Scholar
Lee, B. (1989) “The miscarriage of necessity and invention: Proto-Keynesianism and democratic states in the 1930s,” in Hall, P. (ed.) The Political Power of Economic Ideas. Princeton: Princeton University Press:129–70.Google Scholar
Leff, M. (1984) The Limits of Symbolic Reform: The New Deal and Taxation, 1933-1939. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lindblom, C. (1959) “The science of muddling through.” Public Administration Review 19: 79–88 Google Scholar
Lyung, G. M., and Box, G. E. P. (1978) “On a measure of lack of fit in time series models.” Biometrika 66: 67–72 Google Scholar
Mann, M. (1988) “State and society, 1130-1815: An analysis of English state finances,” in Mann, M. (ed.) States, War, and Capitalism. New York: Basil Blackwell:73–123.Google Scholar
Martin, C. J. (1991) Shifting the Burden: The Struggle over Growth and Corporate Taxation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McCubbin, J., and Scheuren, F. (1989) “Individual income tax shares and average tax rates, tax years 1951-1986.”Statistics of Income Bulletin 8:39–74.Google Scholar
McDowall, D., McCleary, R., Meidinger, E. E., and Hay, R. A. (1980) Interrupted Time Series Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Google Scholar
Musgrave, R., and Musgrave, P. (1989) Public Finance in Theory and Practice. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Peacock, A., and Wiseman, J. (1961) The Growth of Public Expenditure in the United Kingdom. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pechman, J. A. (1987) Federal Tax Policy, 5th ed. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Pechman, J. A., and Okner, B. A. (1974) Who Bears the Tax Burden? Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (1993) “When effect becomes cause: Policy feedback and political change.” World Politics 45(July): 595–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, P. (1994) Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrenchment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Piven, F. F., and Cloward, R. A. (1982) The New Class War: Reagan's Attack on the Welfare State and Its Consequences. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Quadagno, J., and Knapp, S. J. (1992) “Have historical sociologists forsaken theory? Thoughts on the history/theory relationship.” Sociological Methods and Research 20 (4): 481–507 Google Scholar
Quinn, D., and Shapiro, R. (1991a) “Business political power: The case of taxation.” American Political Science Review 85(3):851–74.Google Scholar
Quinn, D., and Shapiro, R. (1991b) “Economic growth strategies: The effects of ideological partisanship on interest rates and business taxation in the United States.” American Journal of Political Science 35(3): 656–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, P. C. (1984) The Supply-Side Revolution. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rose, S. J. (1986) The American Profile Poster. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Salant, W. S. (1989) “The spread of Keynesian doctrines and practices in the United States,” in Hall, P. (ed.) The Political Power of Economic Ideas. Princeton: Princeton University Press: 25–51.Google Scholar
Savage, J. D. (1988) Balanced Budgets and American Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Scheuren, F., and McCubbin, J. (1989) “Individual income tax shares and average tax rates, tax years 1916-1950.”Statistics of Income Bulletin 8:1–70.Google Scholar
Sokal, R. B., and Sneath, P. H. A. (1963)Principles of Numerical Taxonomy. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
Stanley, R. (1993) Dimensions of Law in the Service of Order: Origins of the Federal Income Tax, 1861-1913. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stein, H. (1990) The Fiscal Revolution in America. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute Press.Google Scholar
Stein, H. (1996) “The fiscal revolution in America, Part II: 1964-1994,” in Brownlee, W. E. (ed.) Funding the Modern American State, 1941-1995. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press:194–288.Google Scholar
Steinmo, S. (1993) Taxation and Democracy: Swedish, British, and American Approaches to Financing the Modern State. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Tilly, C. (1985) “War making and state making as organized crime,” in Evans, P., Rueschemeyer, D., and Skocpol, T. (eds.) Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 169–91.Google Scholar
Tilly, C. (1990) Coercion, Capital, and European States, ad 990-1990. New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce (1988) Statistical Abstract of the United States, 1988. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Weir, M. (1989) “Ideas and politics: The acceptance of Keynesianism in Britain and the United States,” in Hall, P. (ed.) The Political Power of Economic Ideas. Princeton: Princeton University Press: 53–86.Google Scholar
Weir, M. (1992) Politics and Jobs: The Boundaries of Employment Policy in the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Weir, M., and Skocpol, T. (1985) “State structures and the possibilities for ‘Keynesian’ responses to the great depression in Sweden, Britain, and the United States,” in Evans, P., Rueschemeyer, D., and Skocpol, T. (eds.) Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press:107–63.Google Scholar
Williamson, J. G., and Lindert, P. H. (1980)American Inequality: A Macroeconomic History. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Witte, J. (1985) The Politics and Development of the Federal Income Tax. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar