Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:47:40.281Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Whaling Industry and Fertility Decline: Nantucket, Massachusetts 1660-1850

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Barbara J. Logue
Barbara J. Logue*
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The central interest of this article is to describe the interrelationship of fertility patterns with occupational structure for a sample of married couples in one maritime community—Nantucket, Massachusetts—over a period of nearly 200 years. Marital fertility declined substantially in Nantucket from its first white settlement in 1660 to 1850. During this time the whaling industry was undergoing intervals of expansion, prosperity, virtual destruction, and renewal, eventually failing to recover from a long decline that began in the 1840s. An explanation of the observed Falls in fertility is not possible without reference to trends in the whaling industry, as this article attempts to demonstrate.

A sustained decline in American fertility rates from at least 1800 and perhaps earlier has been documented (Coale and Zelnik, 1963; Easterlin, 1971, 1976a, 1976b; Forster and Tucker, 1972; Vinovskis, 1976; Yasuba, 1962). Causes of the decline may include the changing availability of farmland, urbanization and industrialization, literacy, and such demographic factors as a decline in mortality, changes in the sex ratio at marriageable ages, and ethnic composition. A number of researchers have even suggested that Falls in family size were at least partly due to deliberate attempts by individual couples not to exceed their desired number of children (Kantrow, 1980; Osterud and Fulton, 1976; Temkin-Greener and Swedlund, 1978; Wells, 1971). For Nantucket in particular, Byers (1982) also presented evidence for a substantial fertility decline from 1680 to 1840, claiming that his findings “demonstrate community-wide acceptance of voluntary fertility control.” The present study, in contrast, found no evidence of deliberate fertility control in Nantucket.

Type
Research Article
Information
Social Science History , Volume 7 , Issue 4 , Fall 1983 , pp. 427 - 456
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 1983 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I am deeply grateful to Etienne van de Walle for his helpful suggestions on an earlier version of this article.

References

Byers, E. (1982) “Fertility transition in a New England commercial center: Nantucket, Massachusetts, 1680-1840.” J. of Interdisciplinary History 13: 17–40.Google Scholar
Coale, A. J. and Trussell, T. J. (1978) “Technical note: finding the two parameters that specify a model schedule of marital fertility.” Population Index 44: 203–213.Google Scholar
Coale, A. J. and Trussell, T. J. (1974) “Model fertility schedules: variations in the age structure of childbearing in human populations.” Population Index 40: 185–258.Google Scholar
Coale, A. J. and Zelnik, M. (1963) New Estimates of Fertility and Population in the United States. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Crevecoeur, J.H.S. (1904) Letters from an American Farmer. New York: Fox, Duffield.Google Scholar
Easterlin, R. (1978) “The economics and sociology of fertility: a synthesis,” pp. 57–133 in Tilly, C. (ed.) Historical Studies of Changing Fertility. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Easterlin, R. (1976a) “Factors in the decline of farm family fertility in the United States: some preliminary research results.” J. of Amer. History 63: 600–614.Google Scholar
Easterlin, R. (1976b) “Population change and farm settlement in the northern United States.” J. of Economic History 36: 45–83.Google Scholar
Easterlin, R. (1971) “Does human fertility adjust to the environment?” Amer. Economic Association Papers and Proceedings 61: 399–407.Google Scholar
Forster, C. and Tucker, G.S.L. (1972) Economic Opportunity and White American Fertility Ratios 1800-1860. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Garner, S. [ed.] (1966) The Captain’s Best Mate: The Journal of Mary Chipman Lawrence on the Whaler Addison 1856-1860. Providence, RI: Brown Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Henry, L. (1976) Etude de la fecondite des manages a partir de la reconstitution des familles. Bulletin D’Information No. 19: 2–25. Paris: Societe de Demographie Historique.Google Scholar
Henry, L. (1968) “The verification of data in historical demography.” Population Studies 22: 61–81.Google Scholar
Henry, L. (1961) “Some data on natural fertility.” Eugenics Q. 8: 81–91.Google Scholar
Henry, L. (1956) Anciennes Familles Genevoises, étude demographique: XVI-XX siècle. Paris: Travaux et Documents de l’INED.Google Scholar
Hershberg, T. and Dockhorn, R. (1976) “Occupational classification.” Historical Methods 9: 59–77.Google Scholar
Hinshaw, W. W. (1969) Encyclopedia of American Quaker Genealogy. Baltimore: Genealogical Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Hohman, E. P. (1928) The American Whaleman: A Study of Life and Labor in the Whaling Industry. New York: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar
Horsman, R. (1981) “Nantucket’s peace treaty with England in 1814.” New England Q. 54: 180–198.Google Scholar
Kantrow, L. (1980) “Philadelphia gentry: fertility and family limitation among an American aristocracy.” Population Studies 34: 21–30.Google Scholar
Knodel, J. (1979) “From natural fertility to family limitation: the onset of fertility transition in a sample of German villages.” Demography 16: 493–521.Google Scholar
Knodel, J. (1977) “Family limitation and the fertility transition: evidence from the age patterns of fertility in Europe and Asia.” Population Studies 31: 219–249.Google Scholar
Logue, B. (1983) “Demographic change in a maritime community: Nantucket, Massachusetts, 1660 to 1850.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Macy, W. C. (1880) “A concise statement of prominent events from 1835 to 1880,” pp. 213–313 in Macy, O., The History of Nantucket. Mansfield: Macy and Pratt.Google Scholar
Osterud, N. and Fulton, J. (1976) “Family limitation and age at marriage: fertility decline in Sturbridge, Massachusetts 1730-1850.” Population Studies 30: 481–494.Google Scholar
Spears, J. R. (1908) The Story of the New England Whalers. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Starbuck, A. (1969) The History of Nantucket, County, Island, and Town, Including Genealogies of First Settlers. Rutland, VT: Charles E. Tuttle.Google Scholar
Temkin-Greener, H. and Swedlund, A. C. (1978) “Fertility transition in the Connecticut valley: 1740-1850.” Population Studies 32: 27–41.Google Scholar
Vinovskis, M. (1976) “Socioeconomic determinants of interstate fertility differentials in the United States in 1850 and 1860.” J. of Interdisciplinary History 6: 375–396.Google Scholar
Wells, R. V. (1971) “Family size and fertility control in eighteenth-century America: a study of Quaker families.” Population Studies 25: 73–82.Google Scholar
Whipple, A.B.C. (1978) Vintage Nantucket. New York: Dodd, Mead.Google Scholar
Whipple, A.B.C. (1954) Yankee Whalers in the South Seas. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Whiting, E. M. and Hough, H. B. (1953) Whaling Wives. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Yasuba, Y. (1962) Birth Rates of the White Population in the United States, 1800-1860: An Economic Study. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.Google Scholar