No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Drug Usage in Relation to Locus of Control
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 May 2015
Abstract
This study evaluated relationships between the use of psychoactive drugs, susceptibility to social influence, and locus of control in a sample of 79 Papua New Guinean university students. Contrary to expectations, drug users did not differ from nonusers in either locus of control or in susceptibility to social influence.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © University of Papua New Guinea & University of Central Queensland 1993
References
REFERENCES
Bau, L., & Dyck, M. (1992). Predicting the peacetime performance of military officers: Officer selection in the Papua New Guinea Defence Force. South Pacific Journal of Psychology, 5, 27–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donovan, D., & O'Leary, M. (1975). Comparison of perceived and experienced control among alcoholics and non-alcoholics. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 84(6), 726–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frewer, L., & Bleus, A. (1991). Personality assessment in a collectivist culture. South Pacific Journal of Psychology, 4, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinrichsen, J.J. (1976). Locus of control among alcoholics: Some empirical and conceptual issues. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 37(7), 908–916.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, W., Woodruff, B., & Werner, W. (1965). Effects of internal and exernal control upon changes in smoking behaviour. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 29(2), 184–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piau-Lynch, A. (1989). Smoking behaviour in Papua New Guinea: The application of Rotter's internal-external construct and analyste of factors influencing smoking behaviour. Unpublished masters thesis, University of Papua New Guinea, Port Moresby.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, M., & Argon, S. (1979). Locus of control and success in self-initiated attempts to stop smoking. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 35(4), 870–872.3.0.CO;2-D>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rotter, J.B. (1966). Generalised expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80 (1, whole No. 609).CrossRefGoogle Scholar