Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T08:37:20.709Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Discussion Forum: The Dawkins Reforms and Psychology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2015

Alan Robson
Alan Robson*
Affiliation:
Department of Political & Administrative Studies, UPNG
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Suggestions that psychology lacks academic substance are common. Recently, in an article in the Australian newspaper, Emeritus Professor John Sutcliffe described it as a “dicky-shirt” discipline -- all form and no substance (Sutcliffe, 1994). He wrapped his observation into a general attack on the Dawkins education reforms which he correctly blames for eroding the intellectual core of Australian academic life. Many academics share Sutcliffe's concerns.

The Dawkins reforms are an uneasy blend of populism and commercialism aimed at achieving the Labour government's economic goal of a “clever country”. Most conspicuously, they have involved the incorporation of former technical institutes into large multi-campus universities. The result has been the physical extension of a university presence across the country into some improbable rural backwaters. Inevitably these dramatic changes in the size and spread of universities have been accompanied by a change in the definition of the role of universities. Topics of study which were once the domain of lower tier tertiary institutions now find a place in the core academic centres. The result has been a shift in the balance of academic interest from abstract to applied research and teaching.

Feeding into these changes has been what Sutcliffe describes as a “money-driven” ethos. After decades of intervention to redress inequalities and irrationalities stemming from the operation of free markets, Labour governments in various parts of the West have capitulated to historical forces and pre-emptively embraced the free enterprise policies of the traditional right.

Type
Articles
Information
South Pacific Journal of Psychology , Volume 8 , 1995 , pp. 40 - 43
Copyright
Copyright © University of Papua New Guinea & the University of Newcastle, Australia 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Campus Review. (1995). 07 20-26.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. (1965). Madness and Civilisation: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason. New York: Pocket Edition.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. (1979). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Feyerabend, Paul, (1978). Against Method. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Robert Hughes, Robert. (1993). The Culture of Complaint: The Fraying of America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Koch, Sigmund. (1974). Psychology as Science, in Brown, S.C. Philosophy of Psychology. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lovibond, Sid. (1994). The Psychology of a Doubter. Higher Education Supplement of The Australian, 11 9.Google Scholar
Abraham Maslow, Abraham. (1968). Towards a Psychology of Being. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
Kevin., McConkey, Siddle, David., Sheehan, Peter. (1994) The Higher Education Supplement of The Australian, 10 5Google Scholar
Sutcliffe, John. (1994) Higher Education Supplement in The Australian, 10 12.Google Scholar