Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:28:00.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Perceptions of inter- and intra-generational communication in the United States of America and the People's Republic of China: Implications for Self-Esteem and Life Satisfaction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2015

Kimberly A. Noels
Affiliation:
University of Saskatchewan, CANADA
Howard Giles
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Barbara, USA
Deborah Cai
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, USA
Lisa Turay
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Barbara, USA

Abstract

The present investigation examined older people's views on communication with younger and older adults to determine if older people's perceptions parallel research findings that suggest that young adults view intra-generational communication more positively than inter-generational communication. Additionally, drawing upon the Communication Predicament of Aging model (Ryan, Giles, Bartolucci, & Henwood, 1986), it considers how these perceptions relate to psychological health. In a first study, older and younger adults from the United States of America responded to a questionnaire survey about their experiences of talking to older and younger adults. The results of analyses of variance suggested that younger adults have less positive perceptions of inter-generational communication than older adults. Regression analyses examined the link between communication climate and psychological health indices, and suggested that psychological health is related to inter-generational and intra-generational communication variables for older participants. In a second study, variations in older adults' intra- and intergroup perceptions were compared across the United States and the People's Republic of China. Unlike their American peers, intergenerational communication was not a significant correlate of adjustment in the Chinese sample, although intragenerational variables were again implicated.

Type
Part IV. Language and Ageing
Copyright
Copyright © University of Papua New Guinea and the Centre for Southeast Asian Studies, Northern Territory University, Australia 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Antonovsky, A. (1987). Unraveling the mystery of health: How people manage stress and stay well. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
Auslander, G.K., & Litwin, H. (1991). Social networks, social support, and self-ratings of health among the elderly. Journal of Aging and Health, 3, 493510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cai, D., Giles, H., & Noels, K.A. (1998). Elderly perceptions of communication with older and younger adults in China: Implications for mental health. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 26, 3251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clément, R. (1996) (Ed.). The social psychology of intergroup communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 15, 221392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coupland, N., Coupland J., & Giles, H. (1991). Language, society and the elderly. Blackwell: Oxford.Google Scholar
Edwards, H., & Giles, H. (1998). Prologue on two dimensions: The risk and management of intergenerational communication. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 26, 112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felton, B.J. & Berry, C.A. (1992). Do the sources of the urban elderiys social support determine its psychological consequences? Psychology and Aging, 7, 8997.Google ScholarPubMed
Fox, S., & Giles, H. (1993). Accommodating intergenerational contact: A critique and theoretical model. Journal of Aging Studies, 7, 423451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallois, C., Giles, H., Ota, H., Pierson, H.D., Ng, S.H., Lim, T., Maher, J., Somera, L., Ryan, E.B., & Harwood, J. (in press). Intergenerational communication across the pacific Rim: An initial eight nation study. In Lasry, J.-C. et al. (Eds.) Proceedings of 13th Conference of the International Association of Cross-Cultural Psychology. Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
Giles, H. (1978). Linguistic differentiation between ethnic groups. In Tajfel, H. (Ed.) Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 361393). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Giles, H., & Coupland, N. (1991). Language attitudes: Discursive, contextual and gerontological considerations. In Reynolds, A. G. (Ed.), McGill Conference on Bilingualism, Multiculturalism and Second Language Learning: A tribute to Wallace E. Lambert (pp. 2142). Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Giles, H., Fox, S., Harwood, J., & Williams, A. (1994). Talking age and aging talk: Communication through the life-span. In Hummert, M.L., Wiemann, J.M., & Nussbaum, J. (Eds.,) Interpersonal communication and older adults (pp. 130161). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Giles, H., & Harwood, J. (1997). Managing intergroup communication: lifespan issues and consequences. In Eliasson, S. & Jahr, E.H. (Eds.) Language and its ecology: Essays in memory of Einar Haugen (pp. 105130). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Giles, H., Harwood, J., Pierson, H.D., Clément, R., & Fox, S. (in press). Stereotypes of the elderly and evaluations of patronizing speech: A cross-cultural foray. In Agnihotri, R. K., Khanna, A. L., & Sachdev, I. (Eds.), Social psychological studies of language (Research in applied linguistics series: IV). New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
Giles, H., & Williams, A. (1994). Patronizing the young: Forms and evaluations. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 39, 3353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harwood, J., Giles, H., Fox, S., Ryan, E.B., & Williams, A. (1993). Patronizing young and elderly adults: Response strategies in a community setting. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 21, 211226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harwood, J., Giles, H., Ota, H., Pierson, H.D., Gallois, C., Ng, S-H., Lim, T-S, & Somera, L-B. (1996). College students' trait ratings of three age groups around the Pacific Rim. Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 11, 307317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harwood, J., Giles, H., & Ryan, E.B. (1995). Aging, communication, and intergroup theory: social identity and intergenerational communication. In Nussbaum, J. & Coupland, J. (Eds.,), Handbook of communication and aging research (pp. 133159). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ho, D., (1994). Filial piety, authoritarian moralism, and cognitive conservatism in Chinese societies. Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs, 120, 347365.Google ScholarPubMed
Hummert, M.L. (1990). Multiple stereotypes of elderly and young adults: a comparison of structure and evaluations. Psychology and Aging 5, 182193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hummert, M.L. (1994). Stereotypes of the elderly and patronizing speech. In Hummert, M.L., Wiemann, J.M., & Nussbaum, J.F. (Eds.) Interpersonal communication in older adulthood: Interdisciplinary theory and research (pp. 162184). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikels, C. (1975). Old age in Hong Kong. The Gerontologist, 15, 230235.Google ScholarPubMed
Krause, N., Liang, J., & Keith, V. (1990). Personality, social support, and psychological distress in later life. Psychology and Aging, 5, 315326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krause, N., Liang, J., & Yatomi, N. (1989). Satisfaction with social support and depressive sympoms: A panel analysis. Psychology and Aging, 4, 8897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitt, M.J., Weber, R.A., & Guacci, N. (1993). Convoys of social support: An intergenerational analysis. Psychology and Aging, 5, 323326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luhtanen, R., & Crocker, J.E. (1991). A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one's social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 302318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maass, A., Salvi, D., Arcuri, L., & Semin, G.R. (1989). Language use in intergroup contexts; the linguistic intergroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 981993.Google ScholarPubMed
Messick, D., & Mackie, D. (1989). Intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 4551.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monk, A., (1988). Aging, loneliness, and communications. American Behavioral Scientist, 2, 532563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noels, K.A., Giles, H., Williams, W., Lim, T., Ng, S.H., Ryan, E.B., & Somera, L. (1997). Intergenerational communication across cultures: Young people's perceptions of conversations with family elders, nonfamily elders, and same-age peers. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the National Communication Association, Chicago, IL, 11 24-28, 1997.Google Scholar
Noels, K.A., Giles, H., Cai, D., & Turay, L. (1998). Perceptions of inter- and intra-generational communication in the United States of America and the People's Republic of China: Implications for psychological health. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the National Communication Association, New York, NY, 11 20-24, 1998.Google Scholar
Paltridge, J., & Giles, H. (1984). Attitudes towards speakers of regional accents of French: Effects of regionally, age, sex of listeners. Linguistische Berichte, 90, 7185.Google Scholar
Park, M., & Kim, M. (1992). Communication practices in Korea. Communication Quarterly, 40, 398404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, D.W., & Cutrona, C.E. (1991). Social support, stress, and depressive symptoms among the elderly: Test of a process model. Psychology and Aging, 6, 190201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryan, E.B., & Cole, R. (1990). Evaluative perceptions of interpersonal communication with elders. In Giles, H., Coupland, N. & Wiemann, J.M. (Eds.), Communication, health and the elderly (pp. 172190). Fulbright International Colloquia & Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Ryan, E.B., Giles, H., Bartolucci, G., & Henwood, J. (1986). Psycholinguistic and social psychological components of communication by and with the elderly. Language and Communication, 6, 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, E.B., Hummert, M.L., & Boich, L., (1995). Communication predicaments of aging: Patronizing behavior toward older adults. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13, 144166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, E.B., Meredith, S.D., MacLean, M.J., & Orange, J.B. (1994). Changing the way we talk with elders: Promoting health using the communication enhancement model. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 39, 2133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryff, C.D. (1989). In the eye of the beholder: Views of psychological well-being among middle-aged and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 4, 195210.Google ScholarPubMed
Ryff, C.D., & Seltzer, M.M. (1996). The parental experience of midlife. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H. (1978)(Ed). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic.Google Scholar
Tobin, J.J. (1987). The American idealization of old age in Japan. The Gerontologist, 27, 5358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Triandis, H.C. (1995) Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Turkowski, B. (1975). Growing old in China. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 11, 3234.Google Scholar
Williams, A., & Giles, H. (1996). Intergenerational conversations: Young adults' retrospective accounts. Human Communication Research, 23, 220250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, A., & Giles, H. (1998). Communication of ageism. In Hecht, M.L., & Baldwin, J. (Eds.) Communication of prejudice (pp. 136160). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, A., Ota, H., Giles, H., Pierson, H.D., Gallois, C., Ng., S-H., Lim, T-S., Ryan, E.B., Somera, L-B, Maher, J., Cai, D., & Harwood, J. (1997). Young peoples' beliefs about intergenerational communication: A initial cross-cultural comparison. Communication Research, 24, 370393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yum, J.O. (1988). The impact of Confucianism on interpersonal relationships and communication patterns in East Asia. Communication Monographs, 55, 374387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar