Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T09:22:18.886Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Selection in Egalitarian Australia: Weighted Average or Motivational Gravity?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2015

Brendan J. Smith  and
Stuart C. Carr
Brendan J. Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Newcastle, AUSTRALIA
Stuart C. Carr
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Newcastle, AUSTRALIA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

All else being equal, the Weighted Averaging Model of person perception (Anderson, 1981) predicts that the number of achievements listed on a job application will not influence the impression formed, whereas the concept of Motivational Gravity suggests (Carr, 1994) that there will be an inverted ’U’ function in work cultures that are egalitarian. In egalitarian Australia, a sample of 312 undergraduates rated their overall impression of an imaginary job candidate who had listed from 5 to 20 randomly generated, but job related and positive personality traits, or achievements, in a job application. Impressions first rose and then fell significantly, especially for female candidates and among raters who were anti-achievement. These findings support the Motivational Gravity model, as well as indicating a possible selection bias in Australian and other centripetal work cultures in the South Pacific region.

Type
Articles
Information
South Pacific Journal of Psychology , Volume 9 , 1997 , pp. 7 - 19
Copyright
Copyright © University of Papua New Guinea & the University of Newcastle, Australia 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, N. H. (1965). Averaging versus adding as a stimulus combination rule in impression formation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 394–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, N. H. (1974). Cognitive algebra: Integration theory as applied to social attribution. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 7, 1–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, N. H. (1981). Foundations of information integration theory. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, N. H., & Shackleton, V. (1993). Successful selection interviewing. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Anderson, N. R. (1992). Eight decades of employment interview research: A retrospective meta-review and prospective commentary. European Work and Organizational Psychologist, 2, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aronson, E., Willerman, B., & Floyd, J. (1966). The effects of a pratfall on increasing interpersonal attractiveness. Psychonomic Science, 4, 157–158.Google Scholar
Arvey, R. D. (1979). Fairness in selecting employees. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Arvey, R. D., & Campion, J. E. (1982). The employment interview: A summary and review of recent research. Personnel Psychology, 35, 281–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asch, S. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 258–290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ashkanasy, N. M. (1994). Automatic categorisation and causal attributions: The effect of gender bias in supervisor responses to subordinate performance. Australian Journal of Psychology, 46, 177–182.Google Scholar
Ashkanasy, N. M. (1997). A cross-national comparison of Australian and Canadian supervisors' attributional and evaluative responses to subordinate performance. Australian Psychologist, 32, 29–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, R. A. (1986). Self-presentation in job interviews: When there can be “too much of a good thing.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 16–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bau, L. P., & Dyck, M. J. (1992). Predicting the peacetime performance of military officers: Officer selection in the Papua New Guinea Defence Force. South Pacific Journal of Psychology, 5, 27–37.Google Scholar
Bigoness, W. (1976). Effect of applicant's sex, race, and performance on employers' performance ratings: Some additional findings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 80–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binning, J. F., Goldstein, M. A., Garcia, M. F., & Scattaregia, J. H. (1988). Effects of preinterview impressions on questioning strategies in same-and-opposite-sex employment interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 30–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, S. C. (1994). Generating the velocity to overcome motivational gravity in LDC business organisations. Journal of Transitional Management Development, 1, 33–56.Google Scholar
Carr, S. C. (1996). Social psychology and culture: Reminders from Africa and Asia. In Grad, H., Blanco, A., & Georgas, J. (Eds.), Key issues in cross-cultural psychology (pp. 68–85). Lisse, Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
Carr, S. C., & MacLachlan, M. (1997). Motivational gravity and culture. In Munro, D., Schumaker, J. F., & Carr, S. C. (Eds.), Motivation and culture (pp. 133–155). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carr, S. C., MacLachlan, M., & Schultz, R. F. (1995). Pacific Asia Psychology: Ideas for development? South Pacific Journal of Psychology, 8, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colheart, M. (1981). MRC Psycholinguistic database User Manual, Vol 1. London, UK: Birkbeck College.Google Scholar
Dipboye, R. L., Fromkin, H. L., & Wiback, K. (1975). Relative importance of applicant sex, attractiveness, and scholastic standing in evaluation of job applicant resumes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 39–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dipboye, R. L. (1982). Self-fulfilling prophecy in the selection-recruitment interview. Academy of Management Review, 7, 579–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dipboye, R. L. (1992). Selection interviews: Process perspectives. Cincinnati: South-Western.Google Scholar
Dougherty, T. W., Turban, D. B., & Callender, J. C. (1994). Confirming first impressions in the employment interview: A field study of interviewer behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 659–665.Google Scholar
Feather, N. T., & Simon, J. G. (1975). Reactions to male and female success and failure in sex linked occupations: Impressions of personality, causal attributions and perceived likelihood of different consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 20–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feather, N. T. (1989). Attitudes towards the high achiever: The fall of the tall poppy. Australian Journal of Psychology, 41, 239–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feather, N. T. (1991a). Attitudes towards the high achiever: Effects of perceiver's own level of competence. Australian Journal of Psychology, 43, 121–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feather, N. T. (1994). Attitudes towards high achievers and reactions to their fall: Theory and research concerning tall poppies. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 1–76 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forgas, J. P. (1985). The psychology of social interaction. Sydney: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Gallois, C., Callan, V. J., & Palmer, J. (1992). The influence of applicant communication style and interviewer characteristics on hiring decisions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 1041–1060.Google Scholar
Giacalone, R. A., & Beard, J. W. (1994). Impression management, diversity, and international management. American Behavioral Scientist, 37, 621–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, D. N., Peacock, A. C., & Smith, J. P. (1980). Impressions of personality in the employment interview. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 294–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karpin, D. (1995). Enterprising Nation. The Quality Magazine, 4, 20–28.Google Scholar
Keenan, A. (1982). Candidate personality and performance in selection interviews. Personnel Review, 11, 20–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kucera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, NY: Brown University Press.Google Scholar
Macan, T. H., & Dipboye, R. L. (1994). The effects of the application on processing of information from the employment interview. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 1291–1314.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1976). Social influence and social change. London, UK: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Paludi, M. A., & Strayer, L. A. (1985). What's in an authors name? Differential evaluations of performance as a function of author's name. Sex Roles, 12, 353–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paludi, M. A. (1990). Sociopsychological and structural factors related to women's vocational development. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 602, 157–168.Google Scholar
Power, V. (1994, 10). Gender bias and the “glass ceiling”. 29th Annual Conference of the Australian Psychological Association, Wollongong.Google Scholar
Thorndike, E. L., & Lorge, I. C. (1944). The teacher's word: Book of 30,000 words. New York Teacher's College, Columbia University.Google Scholar
Tucker, D. H., & Rowe, P. M. (1979). Relationship between expectancy, causal attributions, and final hiring decisions in the employment interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 27–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, L., Shaver, K. G., Jones, R. A., Goethals, G. R., Cooper, J. Robinson, J. E., Gruder, C. L., & Butzine, K. W. (1969). Factors determining choice of a comparison other. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 5, 219–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar