Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T03:05:20.402Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The use of a rapid priming technique I: Adult language processing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2015

Chris Davis
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3052, AUSTRALIA
Anne Castles
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3052, AUSTRALIA

Abstract

This paper discusses the background and use of the masked priming procedure in adult psycholinguistic research. Using this technique, we address the issue of how precise the letter and word processing systems of adults is for rapidly displayed stimuli. Data is reviewed that suggests that, for skilled readers, the letter and word recognition system is sensitively tuned to the discrimination demands imposed on it by the properties of the written language. That is, the recognition system is able to be discriminative where precision is required, but is also able to consider and use incomplete information when this is predictive.

Type
Part III. Psycholinguistics
Copyright
Copyright © University of Papua New Guinea and the Centre for Southeast Asian Studies, Northern Territory University, Australia 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Castles, & Davis, (1998). The neighbourhood density constraint in masked form priming: Word frequency effects. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
Castles, & Davis, , (submitted). The use of a rapid priming technique 2: Word recognition development in children. Submitted to South Pacific Journal of Psychology.Google Scholar
Cavalot, P. (1998) Orthographic processing in Children and Adults. Unpublished fourth year thesis, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1980). Rules and representations. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J.T., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In Domic, S. (Ed,), Attention and performance IV (pp. 535555). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Davis, C. (1990). Masked priming effects. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.Google Scholar
Drews, E.; & Zwitserlood, P. (1995). Morphological and orthographic similarity in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 10981116.Google ScholarPubMed
Ferrand, L., & Grainger, J. (1992). Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition: Evidence from masked nonword priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45, 353372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrand, L., & Grainger, J. (1994). Effects of orthography are independent of phonology in masked form priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 365382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferrand, L., Segui, J., & Grainger, J. (1996). Masked priming of word and picture naming: The role of syllabic units. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 708723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrand, L., Segui, J., & Humphreys, G.W. (1997). The syllableis role in word naming. Memory & Cognition, 25, 458470.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fodor, J.A. (1983). The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge, MA: The M.I.T. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forster, K.I. (1987). Form priming with masked primes: The best match hypothesis. In Coltheart, M. (ed.). Attention and Performance XII. London: Erlbaum and Associates.Google Scholar
Forster, K.I., & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, and Cognition, 10, 689698.Google Scholar
Forster, K.I., & Davis, C. (1991). The density constraint on form priming in the naming task: Interference effects from a masked prime. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forster, K.I., & Taft, M. (1994). Bodies, antibodies, and Neighbourhood-density effects in masked form priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 844863.Google Scholar
Forster, K.I., & Veres, C. (1998). The prime lexicality effect: Fonn priming as a function of prime awareness, lexical status, and discrimination difficulty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 498514.Google Scholar
Garfield, J. L. (1987). Modularity in knowledge representation and natural-language understanding. Cambridge, MA, USA: Mit Press Google Scholar
Grainger, J., & Ferrand, L. (1994). Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition: effects of masked homophone primes. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 218233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grainger, J., & Ferrand, L. (1996). Masked orthographic and phonological priming in visual word recognition and naming: Cross-task comparisons. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 623647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillinger, M.L. (1980). Priming effects with phonemically similar words: The encoding-bias hypothesis reconsidered. Memory & Cognition, 8, 115123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Humphreys, G. W., Besner, D., & Quinlan, P. T. (1988). Event perception and the word repetition effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 5167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacoby, L. L. (1983). Perceptual enhancement: Persistent effects of an experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition. 9, 2138.Google ScholarPubMed
LaBerge, D., and Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word recognition. Cognition, 25, 588604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meyer, D.E., Schvaneveldt, R.W., and Ruddy, M.G. (1974). Loci of Contextual Effects on Visual Word Recognition. In Rabbit, P.M.A. & Dornic, S. (Eds.), Attention and Performance V, Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Monsell, S. (1985). Repetition and the lexicon. In Ellis, A. W.. (ED.). Progress in the Psychology of Language, Vol., 2. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.Google Scholar
Morton, J. (1970). A functional model of memory. In Norman, D. A. (ed.). Models of human memory. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Napps, S. E., & Fowler, C. A. (1987). Formal relationships among words and the organization of the mental lexicon. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 16, 257272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norris, D. (1986). Word recognition: Context effects without priming. Cognition, 22, 93136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perea, M., & Gotor, A. (1997). Associative and semantic priming effects occur at very short stimulus-onset asynchronies in lexical decision and naming. Cognition, 62, 223240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rajaram, S., & Neely, J H. (1992). Dissociative masked repetition priming and word frequency effects in lexical decision and episodic recognition tasks. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 152182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanchez-Casas, R. M. (1996). Lexical access in visual word recognition: The contribution of visual word form. In Carreiras, M., Garcia-Albea, J., Sebastian-Galles, N. (Eds), Language processing in Spanish. Mahway, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Segui, J.A., & Grainger, J. (1990). Priming word recognition with orthographic neighbours: Effects of relative prime-target frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 6576.Google Scholar
Scarborough, D.L., Cortese, C. & Scarborough, H. (1977). Frequency and repetition effects in lexical memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 112.Google Scholar
Sherrington, C. S. (1906) The integrative action of the nervous system. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Syros, H. (1998). Word fragment priming in children and adults. Unpublished Honours thesis. University of Melbourne.Google Scholar