Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:33:23.214Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Estimates of Self, Parental, and Partner Multiple Intelligence and their Relationship with Personality, Values, and Demographic Variables: A Study in Britain and France

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2013

Viren Swami ,
Adrian Furnham  and
Susan Zilkha
Viren Swami*
Affiliation:
University of Westminster (UK)
Adrian Furnham
Affiliation:
University College London (UK)
Susan Zilkha
Affiliation:
University College London (UK)
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Viren Swami, Department of Psychology, University of Westminster, 309 Regent Street, London W1B 2UW, (UK). E-mail: virenswami@hotmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the present study, 151 British and 151 French participants estimated their own, their parents' and their partner's overall intelligence and 13 ‘multiple intelligences.’ In accordance with previous studies, men rated themselves as higher on almost all measures of intelligence, but there were few cross-national differences. There were also important sex differences in ratings of parental and partner intelligence. Participants generally believed they were more intelligent than their parents but not their partners. Regressions indicated that participants believed verbal, logical-mathematical, and spatial intelligence to be the main predictors of intelligence. Regressions also showed that participants' Big Five personality scores (in particular, Extraversion and Openness), but not values or beliefs about intelligence and intelligences tests, were good predictors of intelligence. Results were discussed in terms of the influence of gender-role stereotypes.

En el presente estudio, 151 participantes británicos y 151 franceses estimaron su propia inteligencia global y 13 “inteligencias múltiples”, así como de sus padres y parejas. En concordancia con estudios previos, los varones se asignaban puntuaciones más altas en casi todas las medidas de inteligencia, pero había pocas diferencias trasnacionales. También había importantes diferencias por el sexo en las estimaciones de inteligencia de los padres y de la pareja. Los participantes creían, en general, que eran más inteligentes que sus padres pero no de sus parejas. Las regresiones indicaron que los participantes creían que la inteligencia lógico-matemática y la inteligencia espacial eran los predictores principales de la inteligencia. Las regresiones también mostraron que las puntuaciones de los participantes en los rasgos de personalidad Big Five (en particular, Extraversión y Apertura), pero no en valores o en creencias acerca de la inteligencia o de las pruebas de inteligencia, eran buenos predictores de la inteligencia. Se comentan los resultados en términos de la influencia de los estereotipos género-rol.

Keywords

self-estimatesintelligencecross-nationalpersonalityauto-estimacionesinteligenciatrasnacionalpersonalidad
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , November 2009 , pp. 528 - 539
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, P. L. (1999). Traits and knowledge as determinants of learning and individual differences: Putting it all together. In Ackerman, P. L. Kyllonen, P. C. et al. (Eds.), Learning and individual differences: Process, trait and content determinants (pp. 437–462). Atlanta: Georgia Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Ackerman, P. L., & Beier, M. E. (2003). Intelligence, personality and interests in the career choice process. Journal of Career Assessment, 11, 205–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beloff, H. (1992). Mother, father and me: Our IQ. The Psychologist, 5, 309–311Google Scholar
Bennett, M. (2000). Self-estimates and population estimates of ability in men and women. Australian Journal of Psychology, 59, 960–970.Google Scholar
Byrd, M., & Stacey, B. (1993). Bias in IQ perception. The Psychologist, 6, 16.Google Scholar
Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2006). Intellectual competence and the intelligent personality: A third way in differential psychology. Review of General Psychology, 10, 251–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Furnham, A., & Moutafi, J. (2004). The relationship between estimated and psychometric personality and intelligence scores. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 505–513.Google Scholar
Costa, P., & McCrae, R. (1992). The five factor model of personality and its relevance to personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 6, 343–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furnham, A. (2000). Parents' estimates of their own and their children's multiple intelligences. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 18, 583–594.Google Scholar
Furnham, A. (2001). Self-estimates of intelligence: Culture and gender differences in self and other estimates of General (g) and multiple intelligences. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 1381–1405.Google Scholar
Furnham, A., & Akande, D. (2004). African parents' estimates of their own and their children's multiple intelligences. Current Psychology, 22, 281–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furnham, A., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2005). Estimating one's own and one's relatives' multiple intelligence: A study from Argentina. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 8, 12–20.Google Scholar
Furnham, A., Fong, G., & Martin, N. (1999). Sex and cross-cultural differences in the estimated multi-faceted intelligence quotient for self, parents and siblings. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 1025–1034.Google Scholar
Furnham, A., & Gasson, L. (1998). Sex differences in parental estimates of their children's intelligence. Sex Roles, 38, 151–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furnham, A., Hosoe, T., & Tang, L.-P. (2002). Male hubris and female humility? A cross-cultural study of ratings of self, parental and sibling multiple intelligence in America, Britain and Japan. Intelligence, 30, 101–115.Google Scholar
Furnham, A., McManus, I. C., & Scott, D. (2003). Personality, empathy and attitudes to animal welfare. Anthrozoös, 16, 135–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furnham, A., & Mkhize, N. (2003). Zulu mothers' beliefs about their own and their children's intelligence. Journal of Social Psychology, 12, 83–94.Google Scholar
Furnham, A., & Mottabu, R. (2004). Sex and culture differences in estimates of general and multiple intelligence: A study comparing British and Egyptian students. Individual Differences Research, 2, 82–96.Google Scholar
Furnham, A., & Petrides, K. V. (2004). Parental estimates of five types of intelligence. Australian Journal of Psychology, 56, 10–17.Google Scholar
Furnham, A., Rakow, T., Sarmany-Schuller, I., & de Fruyt, F. (1999). European differences in self–perceived multiple intelligence. European Psychologist, 4, 131–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furnham, A., & Rawles, R. (1995). Sex differences in the estimation of intelligence. Journal of Social Behaviour and Personality, 10, 741–745.Google Scholar
Furnham, A., Reeves, E., & Budhani, S. (2002). Parents think their sons are brighter than their daughters. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 163, 24–39.Google Scholar
Furnham, A., & Ward, C. (2001). Sex differences, test experience and the self-estimation of multiple intelligence. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 30, 52–59.Google Scholar
Furnham, A., Shahidi, S., & Baluch, B. (2002). Sex and culture differences in perceptions of estimates multiple intelligences for self and family: A British-Iranian comparison. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 270–285.Google Scholar
Furnham, A., Wytykowska, A., & Petrides, K. V. (2005). Estimates of multiple intelligences: A study in Poland. European Psychologist, 10, 51–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Hogan, H. (1978). IQ self-estimates of males and females. Journal of Social Psychology, 106, 137–138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Madrigal, R. (1995). Personal values, traveller personality type, and leisure travel style. Journal of Leisure Research, 27, 125–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McManus, I. C., & Furnham, A. (2006). Aesthetic activities and aesthetic attitudes: Influences of education, background and personality on interest and involvement in the arts. British Journal of Psychology, 97, 555–587.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peterson, E.R., & Whiteman, M.C. (2007). ‘I think I can, I think I can…': The interrelationships among self–assessed intelligence, self–concept, self–efficacy and the personality trait intellect in university students in Scotland and New Zealand. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 959–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrides, K., & Furnham, A. (2000). Gender differences in measured and self-estimated trait emotional intelligence. Sex Roles, 41, 449–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pleck, J. H. (1987). The myth of masculinity (3rd edition). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rammstedt, B., & Rammsayer, T. (2002). Self–estimated intelligence: Gender differences, relationship to psychometric intelligence and moderating effects of level of education. European Psychologist, 7, 275–284.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.) (1988). The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Street, S., Kimmel, E. B., & Kromrey, J. D. (1995). Revisiting university student gender role perceptions. Sex Roles, 33, 183–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swami, V., Furnham, A., & Kannan, K. (2006). Estimating self, parental and partner multiple intelligence: A replication in Malaysia. The Journal of Social Psychology, 146, 645–655.Google Scholar
Swami, V., Furnham, A., Georgiades, C., & Pang, L. (2007). Evaluating self and partner physical attractiveness. Body Image: An International Journal of Research, 4, 97–101.Google Scholar
Williams, J. E., & Best, D. L. (1990). Measuring sex stereotypes: A multination study. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar