Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T16:58:00.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Facebook: Risks and Opportunities in Brazilian and Portuguese Youths with Different Levels of Psychosocial Adjustment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 August 2018

Teresa Paula Marques*
Affiliation:
Universidade de Lisboa (Portugal)
Alexandra Marques-Pinto
Affiliation:
Universidade de Lisboa (Portugal)
Maria-João Alvarez
Affiliation:
Universidade de Lisboa (Portugal)
Cícero Roberto Pereira
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal da Paraíba (Brazil)
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Teresa Paula Marques. Universidade de Lisboa. Faculdade de Psicologia. 1649-013 Lisboa (Portugal). E-mail: marques.teresapaula@gmail.com

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the risks and opportunities associated with Facebook usage and to explore the moderating role of psychosocial (mal)adjustment, nationality and age in these relationships. This correlational study involved a sample of 452 Brazilian and 500 Portuguese youths, aged between 14 and 20 years. Results showed that these youths spent a daily average of 61-120 minutes on Facebook, three to four times per week, displaying a positive attitude towards its use. These characteristics were most notable in the Brazilian youths [t(950) = 5.64, p < .001; t(950) = –5.07, p < .001; and t(950) = – 6.85, p < .001, respectively]. The Portuguese youths ran more risks than the Brazilians [t(950) = 6.36, p < .001], but both youths equally enjoyed the opportunities. In the case of the Portuguese youths, the risks and opportunities were moderated by the frequency of use, in other words “the higher the usage, the more risks and opportunities” (β = –.235 p < .001and β = –.167, p < .001, respectively). The psychosocial adjustment indicators did not moderate the effects of Facebook usage habits in risks and opportunities. The less psychosocially adjusted youths were those who ran more risks and also made the most of the opportunities. The results are discussed in light of the role of psychological, socio-cultural and developmental factors.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alberts, A., Elkind, D., & Ginsberg, S. (2007). The personal fable and risk-taking in early adolescence. Journal Youth Adolescence, 36, 7176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-006-9144-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bargh, J., & McKenna, K. (2004). The Internet and social life. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 573590. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141922CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beyens, I., Frison, E., & Eggermont, S. (2016). I don’t want to miss a thing: Adolescents’ fear of missing out and its relationship to adolescents’ social needs, Facebook use, and Facebook related stress. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biglan, A., Brennan, P., Foster, S. E., & Holder, H. (2004). Helping adolescents at risk: Prevention of multiple problem behaviours. Influences on the development of multiple problems. New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
Błachnio, A., Przepiórka, A., & Pantic, I. (2015). Internet use, Facebook intrusion, and depression: Results of a cross-sectional study. European Psychiatry, 30(6), 681684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2015.04.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brand, M., Young, K. S., Laier, C., Wölfling, K., & Potenza, M. N. (2016). Integrating psychological and neurobiological considerations regarding the development and maintenance of specific Internet-use disorders: An Interaction of Person-Affect-Cognition-Execution (I-PACE) model. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 71, 252266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.08.033CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cingel, D. P., & Krcmar, M. (2014). Understanding the experience of imaginary audience in a social media environment: Implications for adolescent development. Journal of Media Psychology, 26(4), 155160. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciochină, L., & Faria, L. (2009). Individualismo e colectivismo: Fundamentos conceptuais para o estudo intercultural das concepções pessoais de inteligência de estudantes Portugueses e Romenos [Conceptual grounds for the inter-cultural study of the personal conceptions of intelligence of Portuguese and Romanian students]. Revista Antropológicas, 11, 127141.Google Scholar
Comitê Gestor da Internet no Brasil (2014). Tic Kids Online Brasil 2013. Pesquisa sobre o uso da Internet por crianças e adolescentes no Brasil [Research on the use of the Internet by children and adolescents in Brazil]. Retrieved from http://cetic.br/media/docs/publicacoes/2/tic-kids-online-2013.pdfGoogle Scholar
Cunha, M., Pinto Gouveia, J., Salvador, M. C., & Alegre, S. (2004). Avaliação da ansiedade social na adolescência: A versão portuguesa da SAS-A. [Assessment of social anxiety in adolescence: The Portuguese version of the SAS-A] Psychologica, 35, 249263.Google Scholar
Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook "friends": Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 11431168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elmasry, M. H., Auter, P. J., & Peuchaud, S. R. (2014). Facebook across cultures: A cross-cultural content analysis of Egyptian, Qatari, and American student Facebook pages. Journal of Middle East Media, 10, Retrieved from https://jmem.gsu.edu/files/2014/07/Elmasry-paper.pdfGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, M. C., Assmar, E. M., & Souto, S. O. (2002). O individualismo e o coletivismo como indicadores de culturas nacionais: Convergências e divergências teórico-metodológicas [Individualism and collectivism as indicators of national cultures: Theoretical and practical convergences and divergences]. Psicologia em Estudo, 7(1), 8189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, T., Wilhelmsen, T., Wilmots, E., Dodd, B., & Quinn, S. (2016). Social anxiety, attributes of online communication and self-disclosure across private and public Facebook communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 206213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences on work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: SageGoogle Scholar
Ji, G. Y., Hwangbo, H., Yi, J. S, Rau, P. L. P., Fang, X., & Ling, C. (2010). The influence of cultural differences on the use of social network services and the formation of social capital. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 26(11–12), 11001121. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2010.516727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lapidot-Lefler, N., & Barak, A. (2015). The benign online disinhibition effect: Could situational factors induce self-disclosure and prosocial behaviors? Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 9(2), article 3. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2015-2-3Google Scholar
Lay, C.-Y., & Tsai, C.-H. (2016). Cyberbullying in the social networking sites: An online disinhibition effect perspective. Proceedings of the 3rd Multidisciplinary International Social Networks Conference on Social Informatics, Data Science 2016, 4. https://doi.org/10.1145/2955129.2955138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kross, E., Verduyn, P., Demiralp, E., Park, J., Lee, D. S., Lin, N., … Ybarra, O. (2013). Facebook use predicts declines in subjective well-being in young adults. PLoS ONE 8(8), e69841. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0069841CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marques, T. P., Marques Pinto, A., & Alvarez, M.-J. (2016). Estudo psicométrico da Escala de Avaliação dos Riscos e Oportunidades dos jovens utilizadores do Facebook [Psychometric study of the Assessment of Risks and Opportunities in Young Users of Facebook Scale]. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico e Avaliação Psicológica, 41(1), 145158.Google Scholar
Metzger, M. J., & Suh, J. J. (2017). Comparative optimism about privacy risks on Facebook. Journal of Communication, 67, 203232. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neto, F. (n.d.). Avaliação da solidão [Assessment of loneliness]. Psicologia Clínica, 2, 6579.Google Scholar
Ólafsson, K., Livingstone, S., & Haddon, L. (2014). Children’s use of online technologies in Europe. A review of the European evidence base (Rev. Text). Retrieved from EU Kids Online website https://www.dependencias.pt/ficheiros/conteudos/files/Children.pdfGoogle Scholar
Oberst, U., Wegmann, E., Stodt, B., Brand, M., & Chamarro, A. (2017). Negative consequences from heavy social networking in adolescents: The mediating role of fear of missing out. Journal of Adolescence, 55, 5160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.12.008CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oliveira, M. C. L., Pereira, M. G. D., & Oliveira, L. P. (2010). Brasil e Portugal: Até que ponto iguais, até que ponto diferentes. Comparação entre Brasil e Portugal, dimensões culturais [Brazil and Portugal: To what extent are they similar and different? Comparison between the cultural dimensions of Brazil and Portugal]. Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro. Retrieved from http://www.geocities.ws/ail_br/brasileportugualatequeponto.html#Google Scholar
O’Keeffe, G. S., & Clarke-Pearson, K. (2011). The impact of social media on children, adolescents, and families. Pediatrics, 127(4), 800804. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-0054CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
OfCom (2008). Social networking – A quantitative research report into attitudes, behaviors and use. Retrieved from OfCom Office of Communications website http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/02_04_08_ofcom.pdfGoogle Scholar
Przybylski, A. K., Murayama, K., DeHaan, C. R., & Gladwell, V. (2013). Motivational, emotional, and behavioral correlates of fear of missing out. Computers in Human Behavior 29(4), 18411848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pumper, M. A., Yaeger, J. P., & Moreno, M. A. (2013). Perceptions and use of social networking sites in the United States and Ecuador: A mixed-methods approach. Psychology and Behavioural Sciences Collection, 47(3), 478484.Google Scholar
Qiu, L., Lin, H., & Leung, A. K.-Y. (2012). Cultural differences and switching of in-group sharing behavior between an American (Facebook) and a Chinese (Renren) social networking site. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44, 106121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022111434597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricca, P. (2009). Portugueses estão mais individualistas e menos preconceituosos [The Portuguese are more individualist and less prejudiced]. Jornal Público. Retrieved from: https://www.publico.pt/sociedade/noticia/portugueses-estao-mais-individualistas-e-menos-preconceituosos-1389381Google Scholar
Subrahmanyam, K., & Lin, G. (2007). Adolescent on the net: Internet use and well-being. Adolescence, 42(168), 659677.Google ScholarPubMed
Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 7(3), 321326. https://doi.org/10.1089/1094931041291295CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
The Hofstede Center. Strategy-culture-change. Retrieved from https://www.hofstede-insights.com/product/compare-countries/Google Scholar