Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:21:15.551Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Measuring Subjective Resilience despite Adversity due to Family, Peers and Teachers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2013

Jesús Alonso-Tapia ,
Carmen Nieto  and
Miguel A. Ruíz
Jesús Alonso-Tapia*
Affiliation:
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (Spain)
Carmen Nieto
Affiliation:
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (Spain)
Miguel A. Ruíz
Affiliation:
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (Spain)
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Jesús Alonso-Tapia. Facultad de Psicología. Universidad Autónoma. 28049 Madrid (Spain). Phone: +34-914974598. Fax: +34-914975215. E-Mail: jesus.alonso@uam.es
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The objective of this study is to develop and validate a scale of subjective resilience for students 12–17 years old. Items covered adverse situations due to parents’, peers’ and teachers’ actions. The validation process included the analysis on the generalizability of the factor structure and of relationships of resilience scores with different kinds of protective and vulnerability factors -goal orientations and learning-oriented classroom motivational climate (CMC)-. A total of 471 students answered four questionnaires. Confirmatory factor analyses, reliability analysis and correlation and regression analyses were carried out. Results showed: (a) that factor structure was well defined; (b) that resilience scale had good reliability; (c) that scores correlated as expected with protective-vulnerability factors such as goal orientations and CMC defined by teachers’ teaching-patterns, and (d) that students’ attribution of perceived change in resilience to teachers’ work depended on the degree in which CMC was learning oriented. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

Keywords

resilienceassessmentgoal orientationsclassroom motivational climate
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 16 , 2013 , E19
Copyright
Copyright © Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This research was supported by the grant of the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, DU 2009-11765 / EDUC.

References

Alonso-Tapia, J. (2005). Motives, expectancies and value-interests related to learning: The MEVA questionnaire. Psicothema, 17, 404–411.Google Scholar
Alonso-Tapia, J., & Fernández, B. (2008). Development and initial validation of the classroom motivational climate questionnaire (CMCQ). Psicothema, 20, 883–889.Google Scholar
Alonso-Tapia, J., & Fernández, B. (2009). Clima motivacional de clase: Validez transcultural e implicaciones educativas. [Classroom motivational climates: Cross-cultural validity and educational implications]. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 32, 597–612. http://dx.doi.org/10.1174%2F021037009789610368 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alonso-Tapia, J., & Moral, A. (2010). Percepción del clima motivacional de clase en estudiantes adultos no universitarios. [Perception of classroom motivational climate in non-university adult students] Revista de Psicología Educativa, 16, 115–133. http://dx.doi.org/10.5093/ed2010v16n2a3 Google Scholar
Alonso-Tapia, J., Huertas, J. A., & Ruíz, M. A. (2010). On the nature of motivational orientations: Implications of assessed goals and gender differences for motivational goal theory. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 13, 231–242.Google Scholar
Alonso-Tapia, J., & Panadero, E. (2010). Effect of self-assessment scripts on self-regulation and learning. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 33, 385–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alonso-Tapia, J., & Pardo, A. (2006). Assessment of learning environment motivational quality from the point of view of secondary and high school learners. Learning and Instruction, 16, 1–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.07.002 Google Scholar
Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261–271. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261 Google Scholar
Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 260–267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.260 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arbuckle, J. L. (2003). Amos 5.0 update to the Amos user’s guide. Chicago, IL: Small Waters.Google Scholar
Block, J. (2001). Millenial contrarianism: The five-factor approach to personality description 5 years later. Journal of Research in Personality, 35, 98–107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.2000.2293 Google Scholar
Fernández, B. (2009). Desarrollo y validación de un cuestionario de clima motivacional de clase. [Development and validation of a classroom motivational climate questionnaire] . Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Universidad Autónoma, Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar
Forgatch, M. S., & DeGarmo, D. S. (1999). Parenting through change: An effective prevention program for single mothers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 711–724. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.67.5.711 Google Scholar
Good, C., & Dweck, C. (2006). A motivational approach to reasoning, resilience and responsibility. In Sternberg, R. and Subotnik, R. (Eds.), Optimizing student success with the other three R’s: Reasoning, resilience, and responsibility (pp. 39–56). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, N., Spinrad, T. L., Fabes, R. A., Reiser, M., Cumberland, A., Shepard, S. A., … Thompson, M. (2004). The relation of effortful control and impulsivity to children’s resilience and adjustment. Child Development, 75, 25–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00652.x Google Scholar
Elliot, A. J. (2005). A conceptual history of achievement goal construct. In Elliot, A. J. & Dweck, C. (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 52–72). New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tathan, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson-Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Kobasa, S. C., Maddi, S. R., & Kahn, S. (1982). Hardiness and health: A prospective study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 168–177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.168 Google Scholar
Leipold, B., & Greeve, W. (2009). Resilience: A conceptual bridge between coping and development. European Psychologist, 14, 40–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.14.1.40 Google Scholar
Luthar, S. S. (2006). Resilience in development: A synthesis of research across five decades. In Cicchetti, D. & Cohen, D. J. (Eds.), Development Psychopathology: Risk, disorder and adaptation (2 nd ed., pp. 740–795). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Luthar, S. S., & Brown, P. J. (2007). Maximizing resilience through diverse levels of inquiry: Prevailing paradigms, possibilities, and priorities for the future. Development Psychopathology, 19, 931–955. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579407000454 Google Scholar
Luthar, S. S., & Zelazo, L. B. (2003). Research on resilience: An integrative review. In Luthar, S.S. (Ed.), Resilience and vulnerability: Adaptation in the context of childhood adversities (pp. 510–549). New York, NY: Cambridge.Google Scholar
Masten, A. S. (2007). Resilience in developing systems: Progress and promise as the fourth wave rises. Development and Psychopathology, 19, 921–930. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579407000442 Google Scholar
Masten, A. S., & Wright, M. (2009). Resilience over the lifespan: Development perspectives on resistance, recovery and transformation. In Reich, J. (Ed.), Handbook of adult resilience (pp. 213–237). New York, NY: Guilford Books.Google Scholar
Midgley, C., Maher, M. L., Hruda, L. Z., Anderman, E., Anderman, L., Freeman, K. E., …Urdan, T. (2000). Manual for the patterns of adaptive learning scales. University of Michigan, MI.Google Scholar
Nickolite, A., & Doll, B. (2008) Resilience applied in school. Strengthening classroom environments for learning. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 23, 91–113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0829573508316596 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panadero, E., Alonso-Tapia, J., & Huertas, J. A. (2012). Effects of rubrics and self-assessment scripts on self-regulation, learning and self-efficacy in Secondary Education. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 806–813. http://dx.doi.org:10.1016/j.lindif.2012.04.007 Google Scholar
Prince-Embury, S., & Courville, T. (2008). Measurement invariance of the resilience scales for children and adolescents with respect to sex and age cohorts. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 23(1), 26–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0829573508316590 Google Scholar
Reaching In… Reaching out (2010). Resilience: Successful navigation through significant threat. Report prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Children and Youth Services. Toronto, Canada: The Child and Family Partnership.Google Scholar
Windle, G., Bennet, K. M., & Noyes, J. (2011). A methodological review of resilience measurement scales. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 9(8), 1–18. Retrieved from http://www.hqlo.com/content/9/1/8 Google Scholar
Wolchick, S. A., Sandler, I. N., Millsap, R. E., Plummer, B. A., Greene, S. M., Anderson, E., … Haine, R. A. (2002). Six-year follow-up of preventive intervention for children of divorce: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 288, 1874–1881. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.288.15.1874 Google Scholar