Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T10:52:16.580Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Psychometric Properties of the Revised Physical and Social Anhedonia Scales in Non-Clinical Young Adults

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2013

Eduardo Fonseca-Pedrero ,
Mercedes Paino ,
Serafín Lemos-Giráldez ,
Eduardo García-Cueto ,
Úrsula Villazón-García ,
Julio Bobes  and
José Muñiz
Eduardo Fonseca-Pedrero*
Affiliation:
Universidad de Oviedo (Spain)
Mercedes Paino
Affiliation:
Universidad de Oviedo (Spain)
Serafín Lemos-Giráldez
Affiliation:
Universidad de Oviedo (Spain)
Eduardo García-Cueto
Affiliation:
Universidad de Oviedo (Spain)
Úrsula Villazón-García
Affiliation:
Universidad de Oviedo (Spain)
Julio Bobes
Affiliation:
Universidad de Oviedo (Spain)
José Muñiz
Affiliation:
Universidad de Oviedo (Spain)
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Eduardo Fonseca Pedrero. Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Oviedo, Plaza Feijoo, s/n, 33003 Oviedo (Spain). Phone: +34-985103272. Fax: +34-985104141. E-mail: efonseca@cop.es
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Anhedonia, a central dimension within the schizotypy construct, has been considered to be a promising vulnerability marker for schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. The Revised Physical Anhedonia Scale (RPhA) and Revised Social Anhedonia Scale (RSAS) are two self-reports widely used in the assessment of anhedonia; however, they psychometric characteristics have been scarcely investigated in Spanish population. The objective of the current work was to study the psychometric properties of the Revised Physical and Social Anhedonia Scales in non-clinical young adults. The sample was composed of 728 college students with a mean age of 20.1 years (SD=2.5. The data indicated that the scales showed adequate psychometric characteristics. The Cronbach alpha was 0.95 (RSAS) and 0.92 (RPhA) respectively. The confirmatory factor analysis carried out on the matrix of tetrachoric correlations showed that both scales presented an essentially unidimensional solution. The Revised Physical and Social Anhedonia Scales seem to be adequate for psychosis-risk assessment in non-clinical populations. Future research should further investigate the construct validity in other populations and cultures as well as study its relation to emotional aspects and cognitive endophenotypes.

La anhedonia ha sido considerada como un marcador prometedor de vulnerabilidad a los trastornos del espectro esquizofrénico siendo una dimensión central dentro del constructo de esquizotipia. La Revised Physical Anhedonia Scale (RPhA) y Revised Social Anhedonia Scale (RSAS), son dos autoinformes ampliamente utilizados para la evaluación de la Anhedonia, sin embargo sus propiedades psicométricas han sido escasamente investigadas en población española. El objetivo de este trabajo fue estudiar las propiedades psicométricas de las Escalas Revisadas Anhedonia Física y Anhedonia Social en jóvenes adultos no clínicos. La muestra estuvo compuesta por 728 participantes con una edad media de 20,1 años (DT=2,5). Los datos indicaron que las escalas presentaron un comportamiento psicométrico adecuado. El alfa de Cronbach ascendió a 0,95 (RSAS) y 0,92 (RPhA) respectivamente. El análisis factorial confirmatorio llevado a cabo sobre la matriz de correlaciones tetracóricas indicó en ambas escalas la presencia de una solución factorial esencialmente unidimensional. Las Escalas Revisadas de Anhedonia Social y Anhedonia Física parecen ser pruebas adecuadas para la evaluación del riesgo de psicosis en población no clínica. Futuras investigaciones deberían seguir investigando la validez de constructo en otras poblaciones y culturas así como observar su relación con aspectos emocionales y endofenotipos cognitivos.

Keywords

schizotypypsychosis pronenesssocial anhedoniaphysical anhedoniareliabilityvalidityadaptationesquizotipiapropensión a la psicosisanhedonia socialanhedonia físicafiabilidadvalidezadaptación
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , November 2009 , pp. 815 - 822
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balluerka, N., Gorostiaga, A., Alonso-Arbiol, I., & Haranburu, M. (2007). La adaptación de instrumentos de medida de unas culturas a otras: una perspectiva práctica [Test adaptation to other cultures: A practical approach]. Psicothema, 19, 124–133.Google Scholar
Barrantes-Vidal, N., Fañanás, L., Rosa, A., Caparrós, B., Riba, M. D., & Obiols, J. E. (2002). Neurocognitive, behavioral and neurodevelopmental correlates of schizotypy clusters in adolescents from the general population. Schizophrenia Research, 61, 293–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchard, C., Mueser, K. T., & Bellack, A. S. (1998). Anhedonia, positive and negative affect, and social functioning in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 24, 413–424.Google Scholar
Burbridge, J. A., & Barch, D. M. (2007). Anhedonia and the experience of emotion in individuals with schizophrenia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 116, 30–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Camisa, K. M., Bockbrader, M. A., Lysaker, P., Rae, L. L., Brenner, C. A., & O'Donnell, B. F. (2005). Personality traits in schizophrenia and related personality disorders. Psychiatry Research, 133, 23–33.Google Scholar
Claridge, G. (1997). Schizotypy: Implications for illness and health. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clementz, B. A., Grove, W. M., Katsanis, J., & Iacono, W. G. (1991). Psychometric detection of schizotypy: Perceptual aberration and physical anhedonia in relatives of schizophrenics. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 607–612.Google Scholar
Cohen, A. S., Leung, W., Saperstein, A. M., & Blanchard, J. J. (2006). Neuropsychological functioning and social anhedonia: Results from a community high-risk study. Schizophrenia Research, 85, 132–141.Google Scholar
Collins, L. M., Blanchard, J. J., & Biondo, K. M. (2005). Behavioral signs of schizoidia and schizotypy in social anhedonics. Schizophrenia Research, 78, 309–322.Google Scholar
Chapman, J. P., Chapman, L. J., & Kwapil, T. R. (1995). Scales for the measurement of schizotypy. In Raine, A., Lencz, T. & Mednick, S. A. (Eds.), Schizotypal Personality (pp. 79–106). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, J. P., Chapman, L. J., & Raulin, M. L. (1976). Scales for physical and social anhedonia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87, 374–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, L. J., & Chapman, J. P. (1983). Infrecuency Scale: University of Wisconsin. Unplublished questionnaire.Google Scholar
Eckblad, M., Chapman, L. J., Chapman, J. P., & Mishlove, M. (1982). The Revised Social Anhedonia Scale. Unpublished manuscript, University of Wisconsin - Madison.Google Scholar
Erlenmeyer-Kimling, L., Cornblatt, B. A., Rock, D., Roberts, S., Bell, M., & West, A. (1993). The New York High-risk project: Anhedonia, attentional deviance and psychopathology. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 19, 141–153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fonseca-Pedrero, E., Muñiz, J., Lemos-Giráldez, S., García-Cueto, E., Campillo-Álvarez, A., & Villazón García, U. (2007). Multidimensionality of schizotypy under review. Papeles del Psicólogo, 28, 117–126.Google Scholar
Fonseca-Pedrero, E., Lemos-Giráldez, S., Paino, M., Villazón-García, U., & Muñiz, J., (2009). Validation of the Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire Brief form in adolescents. Schizophrenia Research, 111, 53–60.Google Scholar
Fonseca-Pedrero, E., Lemos-Giráldez, S., Paino, M., Sierra-Baigrie, S., Villazón-García, U., & Muñiz, J. (2009). Experiencias psicóticas atenuadas en población adolescente [Attenuated psychotic experiences in adolescents]. Papeles del Psicólogo, 30, 63–73.Google Scholar
Fonseca-Pedrero, E., Paino, M., Lemos-Giráldez, S., García-Cueto, E., Campillo-Álvarez, A., Villazón-García, U., & Muñiz, J. (2008). Schizotypy assessment: State of the Art and future prospects. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 8, 577–593.Google Scholar
Fonseca-Pedrero, E., Paino, M., Lemos-Giráldez, S., Villazón-García, U., García-Cueto, E., Bobes, J., & Muñiz, J. (2009). Versión reducida del Cuestionario TPSQ de Estilos Perceptuales y de Pensamiento [A reduced version of Thinking and Perceptual Style Questionnaire (TPSQ)]. Psicothema, 21, 499–505.Google Scholar
Franke, P., Maier, W., Hardt, J., & Hain, C. (1993). Cognitive functioning and anhedonia in subjects at risk for schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 10, 77–84.Google Scholar
Freedman, L. R., Rock, D., Roberts, S. A., Cornblatt, B. A., & Erlenmeyer-Kimling, L. (1998). The New York High-Risk Project: attention, anhedonia and social outcome. Schizophrenia Research, 30, 1–9.Google Scholar
Glatt, S. J., Stone, W. S., Faraone, S. V., Seidman, L. J., & Tsuang, M. T. (2006). Psychopathology, personality traits and social development of young first-degree relatives of patients with schizophrenia. British Journal of Psychiatry, 189, 337–345.Google Scholar
Gooding, D. C., Matts, C. W., & Rollmann, E. A. (2006). Sustained attention deficits in relation to psychometrically identified schizotypy: Evaluating a potential endophenotypic marker. Schizophrenia Research, 82, 27–37.Google Scholar
Gooding, D. C., Shea, H. B., & Matts, C. W. (2005). Saccadic performance in questionnaire-identified schizotypes over time. Psychiatry Research, 133, 173–186.Google Scholar
Gooding, D. C., & Tallent, K. A. (2003). Spatial, object, and affective working memory in social anhedonia: An exploraty study. Schizophrenia Research, 63, 247–260.Google Scholar
Gooding, D. C., Tallent, K. A., & Matts, C. W. (2005). Clinical status of at-risk individuals 5 years later: Futher validation of the psychometric high-risk strategy. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 170–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grove, W. M., Lebow, B. S., Clementz, B. A., & Cerri, A. (1991). Familial prevalence and coaggregation of schizotypy indicators: A multitrait family study. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 115–121.Google Scholar
Herbener, E. S., & Harrow, M. (2002). The course of anhedonia during 10 years of schizophrenia illness. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111, 237–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herbener, E. S., Harrow, M., & Hill, S. K. (2005). Change in the relationship between anhedonia and functional deficits over 20-year period in individuals with schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 75, 97–105.Google Scholar
Horan, W. P., Blanchard, J. J., Gangestad, S. W., & Kwapil, T. R. (2004). The psychometric detection of schizotypy: Do putative schizotypy indicators identify the same latent class? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 113, 339–357.Google Scholar
Horan, W. P., Brown, S. A., & Blanchard, J. J. (2007). Social anhedonia and schizotypy: the contribution of individual differences in affective traits, stress, and coping. Psychiatry Research, 149, 147–156.Google Scholar
Horan, W. P., Green, M. F., Kring, A. M., & Nuechterlein, K. H. (2006). Does Anhedonia in schizophrenia reflect faulty memory for subjectively experienced emotions? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115, 496–508.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horan, W. P., Kring, A. M., & Blanchard, J. J. (2006). Anhedonia in schizophrenia: A review of assessment strategies. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 32, 259–273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horan, W. P., Reise, S. P., Subotnik, K. L., Ventura, J., & Nuechterlein, K. H. (2008). The validity of Psychosis Proneness Scales as vulnerability indicators in recent-onset schizophrenia patients. Schizophrenia Research, 100, 224–236.Google Scholar
Jöreskorg, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8 user's reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software International.Google Scholar
Katsanis, J., Iacono, W. G., & Beiser, M. (1990). Anhedonia and perceptual aberration in first episode psychotic patients and their relatives. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 99, 202–206.Google Scholar
Kendler, K. S., Thacker, L., & Walsh, D. (1996). Self-report measures of schizotypy as indices of familial vulnerability to schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 22, 511–520.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kerns, J. G. (2006). Schizotypy Facets, Cognitive Control, and Emotion. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115, 418–427.Google Scholar
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2 ed.). New York, London: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Kwapil, T. R. (1998). Social Anhedonia as a predictor of the development of schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 107, 558–565.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kwapil, T. R., Barrantes-Vidal, N., & Silvia, P. J. (2008). The dimensional structure of the Wisconsin schizotypy scales: Factor identification and construct validity. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 34, 444–457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kwapil, T. R., Crump, R. A., & Pickup, D. R. (2002). Assessment of psychosis proneness in African-American college studients. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 1601–1614.Google Scholar
Lenzenweger, M. F. (2006). Schizotaxia, Schizotypy, and Schizophrenia: Paul E. Meehl's Blueprint for the Experimental Psychopathology and Genetics of Schizophrenia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115, 195–200.Google Scholar
Lewandowski, K. E., Barrantes-Vidal, N., Nelson-Gray, R. O., Clancy, C., Kepley, H. O., & Kwapil, T. R. (2006). Anxiety and depression symptoms in psychometrically identified schizotypy. Schizophrenia Research, 83, 225–235.Google Scholar
Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the questions, weighing and merits. Structure Equation Modeling, 9, 151–173.Google Scholar
Loas, G., Noisette, C., Legrand, A., & Boyer, P. (2000). Is anhedonia a specific dimension in chronic schizophrenia? Schizophrenia Bulletin, 26, 495–506.Google Scholar
Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Ferrando, P. J. (2006). FACTOR: A computer program to fit the exploratory factor analysis model. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 38, 88–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mason, O., & Claridge, G. (2006). The Oxford-Liverpool Inventory of Feelings and Experiences (O-LIFE): Further description and extended norms. Schizophrenia Research, 82, 203–211.Google Scholar
Meehl, P. E. (1962). Schizotaxia, schizotypy, schizophrenia. American Psychologist, 17, 827–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meehl, P. E. (1964). Manual for use with checklist of schizotypic signs: Unpublished manuscript, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Muntaner, C., García-Sevilla, L., Fernández, A., & Torrubia, R. (1988). Personality dimensions, schizotypal and borderline traits and psychosis proneness. Personality and Individual Differences, 9, 257–268.Google Scholar
Muñiz, J., & Bartram, D. (2007). Improving international tests and testing. European Psychologist, 12, 206–219.Google Scholar
Orlova, V. A., Voskresenskaya, N. I., Shcherbakova, N. P., Korsakova, N. K., Savina, T. D., Solenova, E. P., Efanova, N. N., & Malova, J. V. (2007). Integrative neuropsychological characteristics of subcortical-frontal brain regions as a schizophrenia liability factor. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 10, 430–435.Google Scholar
Paino, M. M., Fonseca-Pedrero, E., Lemos-Giráldez, S., & Muñiz, J. (2008). Dimensionality of schizotypy in young people according to sex and age. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 132–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palomar, J. (2008). Poverty, stressful life events, and coping strategies. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 11, 228–249.Google Scholar
Rawlings, D., Williams, B., Haslam, N., & Claridge, G. (2008). Taxometric analysis supports a dimensional latent structure for schizotypy. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1640–1651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schürhoff, F., Szöke, A., Bellivier, F., Turcas, C., Villermur, M., Tigmol, J., & Rouillon, F. L., M., (2003). Anhedonia in schizophrenia: A distinct familial subtype? Schizophrenia Research, 61, 59–66.Google Scholar
Wuthrich, V., & Bates, T. C. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis of the three-factor structure of the schizotypal personality questionnaire and Chapman schizotypy scales. Journal of Personality Assessment, 87, 292–304.Google Scholar