Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T07:27:31.420Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Relational Learning in Glaucous-Winged Gulls (Larus glaucescens)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2013

Tatyana A. Obozova*
Affiliation:
M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University (Russia)
Anna A. Smirnova
Affiliation:
M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University (Russia)
Zoya A. Zorina
Affiliation:
M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University (Russia)
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Tatyana Obozova. Department of Higher Nervous Activity, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119899, Vorob'evy gory, 1–12, Moscow (Russia). E-mail: obozovat@mail.ru
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

An experimental approach was created for the comparative investigation of the cognitive abilities of the glaucous-winged gull (Larus glaucescens) in their natural habitat. The territoriality of gulls during the breeding period and the fact that the gulls inhabiting the territory of the Komandorsky Reserve are practically not in fear of humans allowed us to work with individually recognized birds directly at their nest sites inside the colony. The possibility of using this approach to investigate their cognitive abilities was demonstrated on 24 gulls, in particular, to investigate their abilities for relative size generalization. The first experiment illustrated that the gulls are able to learn to discriminate two pairs of stimuli according to the feature: ‘larger’ or ‘smaller’. They were then given a test to transfer the discriminative rule in which novel combinations of the same stimuli were used. The gulls successfully coped with only a few of these tests. In the next experiment the birds were taught to discriminate four pairs of similar stimuli. The majority of the birds coped with the tests to transfer the discriminative rule both to the novel combinations of familiar stimuli, and also to the novel stimuli of the familiar category (items of different colour and shape). However, none of the birds transferred the discriminative rule to stimuli of a novel category (sets differing by number of components). Thus, in their ability to generalize at a preconceptual level gulls are more comparable with pigeons, whereas large-brained birds (crows and parrots), are capable of concept formation.

Se empleó un enfoque experimental creado para la investigación comparativa de las habilidades cognitivas de los Larus glaucescens en su hábitat natural. La territorialidad de esta especie durante el periodo de reproducción, y el hecho de que las gaviotas que habitan el Parque natural de Komandorski no temen prácticamente al hombre, ha permitido trabajar con ejemplares individuales (concretos) directamente en sus lugares de anidamiento dentro de la colonia. Se ha demostrado sobre 24 gaviotas la posibilidad de empleo de dicho enfoque para la investigación de sus habilidades cognitivas, en concreto, para la investigación de su habilidad de generalización según el atributo relativo del tamaño. En el primer experimento se esclareció que las gaviotas son capaces de aprender a diferenciar dos pares de estímulos según sus atributos de “más” (un grupo de pájaros) y “menos” (segundo grupo de pájaros). Después se les presentaron pruebas para la transferencia de la regla de selección, en las cuales se empleaban nuevas combinaciones de los mismos estímulos. Las gaviotas realizaron de forma exitosa sólo con algunas de estas pruebas. En el siguiente experimento aprendían a diferenciar cuatro pares de estímulos análogos. La mayoría de los pájaros fueron exitosos tanto en las pruebas de transferencia de la regla de selección de nuevas combinaciones de estímulos conocidos, como de estímulos nuevos de la misma categoría (objetos de otro color y forma). Sin embargo, ni un pájaro fue capaz de transferir la regla de selección sobre estímulos de otra categoría (cantidades que difieren en el número de componentes). Así, en cuanto a las habilidades de generalización a un nivel pre-conceptual, las gaviotas son comparables más bien con palomas, ya que pájaros con una organización superior, como son los cuervos o loros, son capaces de formar conceptos.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

References

Bodily, K. D., Katz, J. S., & Wright, A. A. (2008). Matching-to-sample abstract-concept learning by pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 34, 178184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.34.1.178Google ScholarPubMed
Emery, N. J. (2006). Cognitive ornithology: The evolution of avian intelligence. Philosophical Transactions, 361, 2343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2005.1736CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Firsov, L. A. (1977). Povedenie antropoidov v prirodnykh usloviakh. [Behavior of anthropoids under natural conditions]. Leningrade, Russia: Nauka.Google Scholar
Henderson, J., Hurly, T. A., & Healy, S. D. (2006). Spatial relational learning in rufus hummingbirds (Selasphorus rufus). Animal Cognition, 9(3), 201205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-006-0021-zCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katz, J. S., & Wright, A. A. (2006). Same/different abstract – concept learning by pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 32(1), 8086. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.32.1.80Google ScholarPubMed
Koehler, O. (1956, October). Thinking without words. Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Zoology (pp. 7588). Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
Konstantinov, V. M. (1992): Fauna, naselenie i ekologia ptits antropogennych landshaftov lesnoy zony Russkoi ravniny: Problemy sinantopizatsii i urbanizatsii ptits. [Fauna, bird population and ecology in anthropogenic landscapes of the forest zone on the Russian plain: Problems of bird synantropization and urbanization]. (Doctoral dissertation). Moscow, Russia.Google Scholar
Lazareva, O. F., Miner, M., Wasserman, E. A., & Yuong, M. E. (2008). Multiple – pair training enhances transposition in pigeon. Learning and Behavior, 36(3), 174187. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/LB.36.3.174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lombardi, C. M. (2008). Matching and oddity relational learning by pigeons (Columbia livia): Transfer from colour to shape. Animal Cognition, 11, 6774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, G. (1967). Relational learning in the pigeon. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 64(3), 519521. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0025210CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pepperberg, I. M. (1987). Acquisition of the same/different concept by an African Grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus): Learning with respect to categories of color, shape, and material. Animal Learning and Behavior, 15, 423432. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03205051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pepperberg, I. M. (2000). The Alex studies: Cognitive and communicative abilities of grey parrots. Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portmann, A. (1947). Étude sur la cérébralisation des oiseaux I. [Studies of encephalization in birds I]. Alauda, 14, 220.Google Scholar
Rezanov, A. G. (2000). Kormovoye povedenie ptits: Metod tsifrovogo kodirovania i analiz bazy dannykh. [Feeding Behavior of Birds: Digital Coding Method and Analysis of Database]. Moscow, Russia: Shkola Publishing House.Google Scholar
Smirnova, A. A., Lazareva, O. F., & Zorina, Z. A. (1998): Obuchenie serykh voron (Corvus cornix L.) otvlechennomu pravilu vybora po sootvetstviu/nesootvetstiviu s obraztsom. [Training hooded vrows (Corvus cornix L.) in an abstract selection rule relating to conformity/non-conformity to a sample]. Zhurnal Vyshey Nervnoy Deiatelnosti, 48, 855867.Google Scholar
Smirnova, A. A., Lazareva, O. F., & Zorina, Z. A. (2000). Use of number by crows: Investigation by matching and oddity learning. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 73, 163176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2000.73-163CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smirnova, A.A., Lazareva, O. F., & Zorina, Z. A. (2002). Issledovanie sposobnosti serykh voron k elementam simvolizatsii. [Study of the elementary symbolization abilities of hooded crows]. Zhurnal Vyshey Nervnoy Deiatelnosti, 52(2), 241254.Google Scholar
Yudin, K. A., & Firsova, L. V. (2002). Fauna Rossii i sopredelnykh stran. Ptitsy. Vol. II. [Fauna of Russia and adjoining countries. Birds. Vol. II]. Saint Petersburg, Russia: Nauka,.Google Scholar
Wilson, B. J., Mackintosh, N. J., & Boakes, R. A. (1985). Transfer of relational rules in matching and oddity learning by pigeon and corvids. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37, 313332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, A. A., & Delius, J. D. (2005). Learning processes in matching and oddity: The oddity preference effect and sample reinforcement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 31, 425432. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.31.4.425Google ScholarPubMed
Zelenskaya, L. A. (2003). Strategii pitania komandorskoy populatsii serokrylykh chaek (Larus glaucescens Naumann). [Feeding strategy of the Komandorsky islands glaucous-winged gull population]. Zoologicheskiy Zhurnal, 82(6), 694707.Google Scholar
Zelenskaya, L. A. (2008). Izmenenye pitania gnezdiaschikhsa serokrylykh chaek Larus glaucescens na Komandorskih ostrovakh. Biologia i okhrana ptits Kamchatki. [Changes in the feeding of nesting glaucous-winged gulls (Larus glaucescens) on the Komandorsky islands. Bird biology and conservation on Kamchatka]. Moscow, Russia: Tsentr okhrany dikoy prirody.Google Scholar
Zentall, T. R., Wasserman, E. A., Lazareva, O. F., Thompson, R. K. R., & Rattermann, M. J. (2008). Concept learning in animals. Comparative Cognition and Behavior Reviews, 3, 1345. http://dx.doi.org/10.3819/ccbr.2008.30002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zorina, Z. A., & Smirnova, A. A. (1995). Kolichestvennye otsenki u serykh voron: Obobschenie po otnositelnomu priznaku “bolshee mnozhestvo”. [Quantitative evaluation by of Hooded crows: Generalization by relative feature of ‘larger set’]. Zhurnal Vyshey Nervnoy Deiatelnosti, 45(3), 490497.Google Scholar
Zorina, Z. A., & Poletaeva, I. I. (2003). Zoopsikhologia: Elementarnoie myshlenie zhivotnykh. Uchebnoie posobie. [Animal psychology. Elementary thought processes of animals. Textbook]. Moscow, Russia: Aspekt – Press.Google Scholar
Zorina, Z. A., & Smirnova, A. A. (2008). Obobschenie, umozakliuchenie po analogii i drugie kognitivnye sposobnosti vranovykh ptits. [Generalization, reasoning by analogy and other cognitive abilities of the crow family.] Kognitivnye Issledovania, 2, 148165.Google Scholar