Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:09:31.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spanish Adaptation of the Memory Characteristics Questionnaire (MCQ)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2015

Joaquín Pegalajar ,
Alberto Acosta ,
Miguel Castillo ,
Lorenzo Higueras  and
José-Luis Padilla
Joaquín Pegalajar*
Affiliation:
Universidad de Granada (Spain)
Alberto Acosta
Affiliation:
Universidad de Granada (Spain)
Miguel Castillo
Affiliation:
Universidad de Granada (Spain)
Lorenzo Higueras
Affiliation:
Universidad de Granada (Spain)
José-Luis Padilla
Affiliation:
Universidad de Granada (Spain)
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Joaquín Pegalajar. Facultad de Psicología. Universidad de Granada. 18071. Granada (Spain). E-mail: jpchica@ugr.es
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Memory Characteristics Questionnaire (MCQ) was developed by Johnson, Foley, Suengas, and Raye (1988) to assess the characteristics of memories of external and internal origin, postulated in the source monitoring model (Johnson, Hashtroudi, & Lindsay, 1993). The MCQ was translated into Spanish using a back-translation method. Psychometric properties of the translated MCQ were tested using responses collected from an experimental study simulating a forensic context. Ten police officers and 8 psychologists individually interviewed 240 university students who completed the MCQ after reporting what they had seen in a film. Half of the participants were asked to tell the truth, while the other half were asked to lie. The results have shown adequate psychometric properties of the Spanish MCQ items for the total sample and across experimental conditions. Cronbach’s alpha value was .79 for the total sample, .78 for the honest condition, and .76 for the lie condition. Validity evidence of dimensionality supports that the factor structure of Spanish MCQ was equivalent to that proposed by the authors of the original version. Also, a two-factor ANOVA (video clip x condition) was performed to analyze experimental data. Neither interaction effects, F(236) = 1.189; p = .277, nor main effects were found to be significant between those asked to tell the truth and those asked to lie. These results demonstrate that the Spanish MCQ has adequate psychometric properties.

Keywords

Memory Characteristics Questionnaire (MCQ)source monitoringSpanish MCQ
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 18 , 2015 , E101
Copyright
Copyright © Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
Bentler, P. M., & Bonnet, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588 Google Scholar
Caccioppo, J. T., & Gardner, W. L. (1999). Emotion. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 191–214.Google Scholar
Corp, I. B. M. (2012). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0. Armonk, NuevaYork, NY: IBM Corp.Google Scholar
Feldt, L. S. (1969). A test of the hypothesis that Cronbach’s alpha or Kuder-Richardson Coefficient Twenty is the same for two tests. Psychometrika, 34, 363–373. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02289364 Google Scholar
Hashtroudi, S., Johnson, M. K., & Chrosniak, L. D. (1990).Aging and qualitative characteristics of memories for perceived and imagined complex events. Psychology and Aging, 5, 119–126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.5.1.119 Google Scholar
Herrero, G. (Producer), & Lombardi, F. (Director). (1996). Bajo la piel. [Under the skin][Film]. Barberá del Vallés, Spain: (Available from Pioneer Electronics España, S.A. Avd. Salvatella, 122. P.I. Salvatella. Barberá del Vallés. Spain 08210).Google Scholar
Higueras, L. (2003). Aplicación de la entrevista cognitiva con los criterios del control de fuentes a la evaluación de la credibilidad del testimonio [Application of the cognitive interview with source monitoring criteria for the assessment of the credibility of testimony]. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Granada, Spain.Google Scholar
International Test Commission (2010). International Test Commission Guidelines for Translating and Adapting Tests. Retrieved from International Test Commission Webpage https://www.intestcom.org/page/16 Google Scholar
Johnson, M. K., Foley, M. A., Suengas, A., & Raye, C. L. (1988). Phenomenal characteristics of memories for perceived and imagined autobiographical events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 371–376. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0096-3445.117.4.371 Google Scholar
Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.114.1.3 Google Scholar
Johnson, M. K., & Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring. Psychological Review, 88, 67–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.88.1.67 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M. K., & Raye, C. L. (1998). False memories and confabulation. Trends in Cognitive Scicences, 2, 137–145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01152-8 Google Scholar
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993).Testing structural equation modeling. In Bollen, K. A. & Long, J. S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 294–317). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2007). LISREL 8.8. Skokie, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc. Google Scholar
Kline (1994). A handbook of test construction. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Scholz, U., Gutiérrez-Doña, B., Sud, S., & Schwarzer, R. (2002). Is general self-efficacy a universal construct? Psychometric findings from 25 Countries. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18, 242–251.Google Scholar
Scott, R., & Polk, M. (1991). Thelma and Louise.[Film]. (Available from Twentieth Century Fox Home Entertainment España, S.A Avda. Burgos, 8, Madrid, Spain 28036).Google Scholar
Sireci, G., & Padilla, J. L. (2014). Validity assessments: Introduction to special issue. Psicothema, 26, 97–99.Google Scholar
Sporer, S. L., & Küpper, B. (1995). Realitätüberwachung und die beuerteilung des wahrheitsgehaltes von erzählungen: Eine experimentelle studie [Reality monitoring and assessment of credibility of the stories: An experimental investigation]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 26, 173–193.Google Scholar
Suengas, A. G., & Johnson, M. K. (1988). Qualitative effects of rehearsal on memories for perceived and imagined complex events. Journal of Experimental psychology: General, 117, 377–389. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0096-3445.117.4.377 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takahashi, M., & Shimiza, H. (2007). Do you remember the day of your graduation ceremony from junior high school?: A factor structure of the Memory Characteristics Questionnaire. Japanese Psychological Research, 49, 275–281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5884.2007.00353.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Hambleton, R. K. (1996). Translating tests: Some practical guidelines. European Psychologist, 1, 89–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.1.2.89 Google Scholar