Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T05:21:08.213Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spatial Inferences in Narrative Comprehension: the Role of Verbal and Spatial Working Memory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2016

Natalia Irrazabal  and
Debora Burin
Natalia Irrazabal*
Affiliation:
Universidad de Palermo (Argentina)
Debora Burin
Affiliation:
Universidad de Buenos Aires (Argentina)
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Natalia Irrazabal. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas – CONICET - Facultad De Ciencias Sociales - Universidad De Palermo. Mario Bravo, 1259. Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires. (Argentina). 1079. Phone +54114964.4600, +54114964.4600. E-mail: nirrazabal@psi.uba.ar
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

During the comprehension of narrative texts, readers keep a mental representation of the location of protagonists and objects; a breach in spatial coherence is detected by longer online reading times (consistency effect). We addressed whether these spatial inferences involve verbal or spatial working memory in two experiments, combining the consistency paradigm with selective verbal and spatial working memory concurrent tasks. The first experiment found longer reading times with a concurrent spatial task under imagery instructions (t33 = 2.87, p = .021). The second experiment, under comprehension reading instructions, found effects of verbal interference on reading times and accuracy. With a verbal secondary task, reading times for the target sentence were shorter (t45 = 3.60, p = .004) and the error rate was significantly higher (t47 = 2.95, p = .005) than without interference. This pattern of results suggests that spatial inferences in narrative comprehension rely mainly on verbal resources, and spatial working memory resources are recruited when imagery is required.

Keywords

spatial inferencesnarrative comprehensiondiscourse processingworking memory
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 19 , 2016 , E11
Copyright
Copyright © Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In Bower, G. H. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 8, pp. 47–89). New York, NY: Academic Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60452-1 Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. D., & Logie, R. H. (1999). Working memory. The multiple-component model. In Miyake, A. & Shah, P. (Eds.), Models of working memory. Mechanisms of active maintenance executive control (pp. 28–61). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174909.005 Google Scholar
Brunye, T. T., & Taylor, H. A. (2008). Working memory in developing and applying mental models from spatial descriptions. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 701–729. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.08.003 Google Scholar
De Beni, R., Pazzaglia, F., Gyselinck, V., & Meneghetti, C. (2005). Visuo-spatial working memory and mental representation of spatial descriptions. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17, 77–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09541440340000529 Google Scholar
De Vega, M. (1995). Backward updating of mental models during continuous reading of narratives. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 21, 373–386. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.21.2.373 Google Scholar
De Vega, M., Rodrigo, M. J., & Zimmer, H. (1996). Pointing and labeling directions in egocentric frameworks. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 821–839.Google Scholar
Denis, M. (1996). Imagery and the description of spatial configurations. In de Vega, M., Intons-Peterson, M. J., Johnson-Laird, P. N., Denis, M., & Marschark, M. (Eds.), Models of visuo-spatial cognition (pp. 128–197). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102, 211–245. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.102.2.211 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Franklin, N., & Tversky, B. (1990). Searching imagined environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 63–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0096-3445.119.1.63 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gyselinck, V., De Beni, R., Pazzaglia, F., Meneghetti, C., & Mondoloni, A. (2007). Working memory components and imagery instructions in the elaboration of a spatial mental model. Psychological Research, 71, 373–382. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-006-0091-1 Google Scholar
Hair, J. F. Jr., Tatham, R. L., Anderson, R. E., & Black, W. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Towards a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363–394. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.85.5.363 Google Scholar
Logie, R. H. (1995). Visuo-spatial working memory. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Meneghetti, C., De Beni, R., Gyselinck, V., & Pazzaglia, F. (2011). Working memory involvement in spatial text processing: What advantages are gained from extended learning and visuo-spatial strategies? British Journal of Psychology, 102, 499–518. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.2010.02007.x Google Scholar
Morrow, D. G., Bower, G. H., & Greenspan, S. L. (1989). Updating situation models during narrative comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 292–312. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(89)90035-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrow, D. G., Greenspan, S. L., & Bower, G. H. (1987). Accessibility and situation models in narrative comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 165–187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(87)90122-7 Google Scholar
O´Brien, E. J., & Albrecht, J. E. (1992). Comprehension strategies in the development of a mental model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18, 777–784. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.18.4.777 Google Scholar
Pazzaglia, F., De Beni, R., & Meneghetti, C. (2007). The effects of verbal and spatial interference in the encoding and retrieval of spatial and nonspatial texts. Psychological Research, 71, 484–494. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-006-0045-7 Google Scholar
Radvansky, G. A., & Copeland, D. E. (2004). Working memory and situation model processing: Language comprehension and memory. American Journal of Psychology, 117, 191–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rinck, M. (2005). Spatial situation models. In Shah, P. & Miyake, A. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of visuo-spatial thinking (pp. 334–382). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610448.010 Google Scholar
Rinck, M., & Bower, G. H. (1995). Anaphora resolution and the focus of attention in situation models. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 110–131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1995.1006 Google Scholar
Rinck, M., & Bower, G. H. (2000). Temporal and spatial distance in situation models. Memory & Cognition, 28, 1310–1320. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03211832 Google Scholar
Schneider, W., Eschmann, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime user’s guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools, Inc.Google Scholar
Zwaan, R. (2004). The immersed experience: Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. In Ross, B. H.. (Ed.), The psychology of language and motivation, 44. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Zwaan, R., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin. 123, 162–185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.123.2.162 Google Scholar