Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T08:50:04.036Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Theory of Thinking and the Capacity to Mentalize: A Comparison of Fonagy's and Bion's Models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 April 2014

Carla Mantilla Lagos
Carla Mantilla Lagos*
Affiliation:
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be sent to Carla Mantilla Lagos, Calle Roma 148, 401 Lima 18, Perú. E-mail: cmantil@pucp.edu.pe
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper presents a comparison of two psychoanalytic models of how human beings learn to use their mental capacities to know meaningfully about the world. The first, Fonagy's model of mentalization, is concerned with the development of a self capable of reflecting upon its own and others' mental states, based on feelings, thoughts, intentions, and desires. The other, Bion's model of thinking, is about the way thoughts are dealt with by babies, facilitating the construction of a thinking apparatus within a framework of primitive ways of communication between mother and baby. The theories are compared along three axes: (a) an axis of the theoretical and philosophical backgrounds of the models; (b) an axis of the kind of evidence that supports them; and (c) the third axis of the technical implications of the ideas of each model. It is concluded that, although the models belong to different theoretical and epistemological traditions and are supported by different sorts of evidence, they may be located along the same developmental line using an intersubjective framework that maintains tension between the intersubjective and the intrapsychic domains of the mind.

Este artículo muestra la comparación entre dos modelos psicoanalíticos que dan cuenta de cómo los seres humanos alcanzan la posibilidad de usar sus capacidades mentales para conocer y comprender el mundo de un modo significativo. De un lado, el modelo de la mentalización de Fonagy se preocupa por el desarrollo de un sí mismo (self) capaz de reflexionar sobre los estados mentales propios y los de los demás, en términos de pensamientos, sentimientos y deseos. De otro lado, el modelo del pensamiento de Bion, se refiere al modo por el cual el bebé lidia con los pensamientos, y posibilita la construcción de un aparato para pensarlos y acceder a un entendimiento emocional de los mismos, dentro de un marco de comunicación primaria con la madre. Ambos modelos son comparados a través de tres ejes: (a) los antecedentes filosóficos y teóricos, (b) el tipo de evidencia, y (c) las implicaciones para la técnica psicoanalítica. Aunque ambos modelos pertenecen a diferentes tradiciones teóricas y epistemológicas, se concluye que las capacidades para pensar y mentalizar podrían ser ubicadas al interior de una misma línea de desarrollo. Para ello, es necesario utilizar un marco de referencia intersubjetivista, que sostenga la tensión entre los dominios intersubjetivos e intrapsíquicos de la mente.

Keywords

theory of mindintersubjectivitypsychoanalysisthinkingmentalizationBionFonagyteoría de la menteintersubjetividadpsicoanálisispensamientomentalizaciónBionFonagy
Type
Articles
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , May 2007 , pp. 189 - 198
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benjamin, J. (1995). Like subjects, love objects. Essays on recognition and sexual difference. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bion, W.R. (1962). Learning from experience. London: Karnac.Google Scholar
Bion, W.R. (1967a). Second thoughts. London: Maresfield Library.Google Scholar
Bion, W.R. (1967b). Notes on memory and desire. In Spillius, E. (Ed.), Melanie Klein today. Developments in theory and practice. Vol. 2. Mainly practice (pp. 17–21). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bion, W. (1988). Elementos del psicoanálisis. Buenos Aires: Paidós.Google Scholar
Bleandonu, G. (1994). Wilfred Bion. His life and works. 1897–1979. London: Free Association Books.Google Scholar
Britton, R. (1992). Keeping things in mind. In Anderson, R. & Segal, H. (Eds.), Clinical lectures on Klein and Bion (pp. 102–113). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cavell, M. (1993). The psychoanalytic mind. From Freud to philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fonagy, P. (1989). On tolerating mental states: Theory of mind in borderline patients. Bulletin of the Anna Freud Centre, 12, 91–115.Google Scholar
Fonagy, P. (1991). Thinking about thinking: Some clinical and theoretical considerations in the treatment of a borderline patient. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 72, 639–656.Google ScholarPubMed
Fonagy, P., & Bateman, A. (2006). Mentalization-based treatment for borderline personality disorder: A practical guide. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fonagy, P., & Moran, G. (1991). Understanding psychic change in child psychoanalysis. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 72, 15–22.Google ScholarPubMed
Fonagy, P., Moran, G., Edgcumbe, R., Kennedy, H., & Target, M. (1993). The roles of mental representation and mental processes in therapeutic action. Psychoanalytic study of the child, 49, 9–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fonagy, P., Steele, M., Steele, H., Moran, G., & Higgit, A. (1991). The capacity for understanding mental states: The reflective self in parent and child and its significance for security of attachment. Infant mental health journal, 12, 201–218.3.0.CO;2-7>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fonagy, P., & Target, M. (1995). Understanding the violent patient: The use of the body and the role of the father. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 76, 487–501.Google ScholarPubMed
Fonagy, P., & Target, M. (1996a). Playing with reality: I. Theory of mind and the normal development of psychic reality. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 77, 217–233.Google ScholarPubMed
Fonagy, P., & Target, M. (1996b). Playing with reality: II. The development of psychic reality from a theoretical perspective. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 77, 459–479.Google Scholar
Fonagy, P., & Target, M. (1997). Attachment and reflective function: Their role in self-organization. Development and psychopathology, 9, 679–700.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fonagy, P., & Target, M. (1998). Mentalization and the changing aims of child psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic dialogues, 8, 87–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fonagy, P., Target, M., & Gergely, G. (1999, March). A new transgenerational theory of self-development. Paper presented at the IPTAR conference on the Evolution and Dissolution of the Self, New York.Google Scholar
Grinberg, L. (1988). Prólogo. Presentación a la versión castellana. (Prologue Presentation of the Spanish version). In Bion, W.R., Elements of Psychoanalysis. New York: Basic Books (Original work published 1962). (Spanish translation: Elementos del psicoanálisis (2nd ed.; pp. 7–10). Buenos Aires: Paidos, 1988).Google Scholar
Grinberg, L., Sor, D., & Tabak de Bianchedi, E. (1993). New introduction to the work of Bion (revised edition). London: Aronson.Google Scholar
Hinshelwood, R.D. (1991). A dictionary of Kleinian thought. London: Free Association Books.Google Scholar
Joseph, B. (1981). Toward the experiencing of psychic pain. In Grotstein, J.S. (Ed.), Do I dare disturb the universe? A memorial to W.R. Bion (pp. 94–102). London: Karnac.Google Scholar
Lansky, M. (1981). Philosophical issues in Bion's thought. In Grotstein, J.S. (Ed.), Do I dare disturb the universe? A memorial to W.R. Bion (pp. 428–440). London: Karnac.Google Scholar
Malcolm, R. (1992). As if: The phenomenon of not learning. In Anderson, R., & Segal, H. (Eds.), Clinical lectures on Klein and Bion (pp. 114–125). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Meltzer, D. (1986). Studies in extended meta-psychology. Clinical applications of Bion's ideas. Somerset. UK: Trust Clunie Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, S. (1988). Relational concepts in psychoanalysis. An integration. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. [Spanish translation: Conceptos relacionales en psicoanálisis: Una integración. México DF: Siglo XXI, 1993.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Shaughnessy, E. (1988). W.R. Bion's theory of thinking and the new techniques in child analysis. In Spillius, E. (Ed.), Melanie Klein today. Developments in theory and practice. Vol. 2. Mainly practice (pp. 177–189). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
O'Shaughnessy, E. (1992). Psychosis: Not thinking in a bizarre world. In Anderson, R. & Segal, H. (Eds.), Clinical lectures on Klein and Bion (pp. 89–101). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Snelling, D. (2001). Philosophy, psychoanalysis and the origins of meaning. Pre-reflective intentionality in the psychoanalytic view of the mind. Aldershot: AshgatGoogle Scholar
Spillius, E. (1992). Clinical experiences of projective identification. In Anderson, R. & Segal, H. (Eds.), Clinical lectures on Klein and Bion (pp. 59–73). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Steiner, J. (1992). The equilibrium between the paranoid-schizoid and depressive positions. In Anderson, R. & Segal, H. (Eds.), Clinical lectures on Klein and Bion (pp. 46–58). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Steiner, J. (1993). Problems of psychoanalytic technique: Patient centered and analyst centered interpretations. In Steiner, J., Psychic retreats. Pathological organizations in psychotic, neurotic and borderline patients (pp. 131–146). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thorner, H. (1981). Notes on the desire for knowledge. In Grotstein, J.S. (Ed.), Do I dare disturb the universe? A memorial to W.R. Bion (pp. 590–599). London: Karnac.Google Scholar
Wisdom, J.O. (1981). Meta-psychology after forty years. In Grotstein, J.S. (Ed.), Do I dare disturb the universe? A memorial to W.R. Bion (pp. 602–624). London: Karnac.Google Scholar