Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T10:43:34.816Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Yale University's Institute of Human Relations and the Spanish Civil War: Dollard and Miller's Study of Fear and Courage under Battle Conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2013

José María Gondra  and
Manuel Sánchez de Miguel
José María Gondra*
Affiliation:
Universidad del País Vasco (Spain)
Manuel Sánchez de Miguel
Affiliation:
Universidad del País Vasco (Spain)
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to José María Gondra, Facultad de Psicología, Departamento de Psicología Básica. Universidad del País Vasco; Avda. Tolosa, 70, 20018 Donostia-San Sebastián, Gipuzkoa (Spain). E-mail: josemaria.gondra@ehu.es.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the late 1930s, the Institute of Human Relations of Yale University developed a research program on conflict and anxiety as an outcome of Clark Hull's informal seminar on the integration of Freud's and Pavlov's theories. The program was launched at the 1937 Annual Meeting of the APA in a session chaired by Clark L. Hull, and the experiments continued through 1941, when the United States entered the Second World War. In an effort to apply the findings from animal experiments to the war situation, John Dollard and Neal E. Miller decided to study soldiers' fear reactions in combat. As a first step, they arranged interviews with a few veterans of the Abraham Lincoln Brigade. Taking these interviews as a point of departure, Dollard devised a questionnaire to which 300 former Lincoln brigaders responded. The present paper analyzes the main outcomes of the questionnaire, together with the war experiences reported in the interview transcripts. Our purpose was to evaluate a project which was initially investigated by the FBI because of the communists among the Lincoln ranks, but eventually supported by the American Army, and which exerted great influence on the military psychology of the time.

A finales de la década de 1930 el Institute of Human Relations de la Universidad de Yale desarrolló un programa de investigación sobre el conflicto y la ansiedad como resultado del seminario informal de Clark H. Hull sobre la integración de las teorías de Freud y Pavlov. El programa se puso en marcha en la reunión anual de la APA de 1937 en una sesión presidida por Hull y los experimentos continuaron en 1941, cuando los Estados Unidos entraron en la segunda guerra mundial. En un intento de aplicar los hallazgos de los experimentos con animales a la situación bélica, John Dollard y Neal E. Miller decidieron estudiar las reacciones de miedo de los soldados en el combate. Como primer paso concertaron entrevistas con unos pocos veteranos de la Brigada Abraham Lincoln. Tomando estas entrevistas como punto de partida, Dollard diseñó un cuestionario al que contestaron 300 antiguos brigadistas de la Lincoln.

Este artículo analiza los resultados principales del cuestionario, así como las experiencias de guerra reflejadas en las transcripciones de las entrevistas. Nuestro propósito ha sido evaluar un proyecto que fue investigado inicialmente por el FBI por la presencia comunista en las filas de la Lincoln, pero finalmente apoyado por el ejército norteamericano, y que ejerció una gran influencia sobre la psicología militar de la época.

Keywords

Abraham Lincoln Brigadefear in battleneobehaviorismYale Institute of Human Relations. WarPsychologyMilitary PsychologyBrigada Abraham Lincolnmiedo en combateneoconductismoYale Institute of Human RelationsPsicología de GuerraPsicología Militar
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , November 2009 , pp. 393 - 404
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dollard, J. (1942, June 16). Interview with Volunteer XA. John Dollard research files for “fear and courage under battle conditions.” Box 1, Folder 6. Abraham Lincoln Brigade Archive, Tamiment Library, New York University.Google Scholar
Dollard, J. (1942, June 17). Interview with Volunteer XB. John Dollard research files for “fear and courage under battle conditions.” Box 1, Folder 7. Abraham Lincoln Brigade Archive, Tamiment Library, New York University.Google Scholar
Dollard, J. (1942, June 30). Interview with Volunteer XI. John Dollard research files for “fear and courage under battle conditions.” Box 1, Folder 13. Abraham Lincoln Brigade Archive, Tamiment Library, New York University.Google Scholar
Dollard, J. (1942, November 27). Letter to Jack Bjoze. John Dollard research files for “fear and courage under battle conditions.” Box 1, Folder 1. Abraham Lincoln Brigade Archive, Tamiment Library, New York University.Google Scholar
Dollard, J. (1943, April 16). Letter to S. A. Stouffer, Director of the Research Branch of the Special Service Division, U.S. Army. John Dollard research files for “fear and courage under battle conditions.” Box 1, Folder 1. Abraham Lincoln Brigade Archive, Tamiment Library, New York University.Google Scholar
Dollard, J.& Miller, N.E. (1942). Undated Letter to the Veterans of the Abraham Lincoln Brigade. Neal E. Miller Papers, Box 35. Manuscripts and Archives, Yale University Library.Google Scholar
G., (1942, June 29). Interview with Volunteer XH. John Dollard research files for “fear and courage under battle conditions.” Box 1, Folder 12. Abraham Lincoln Brigade Archive, Tamiment Library, New York University.Google Scholar
Horton, D. (1942). Interviews Re Fear. Neal E. Miller Papers, Box 35. Manuscripts and Archives, Yale University Library.Google Scholar
Horton, D. (1942, June 22). Interview with Volunteer XD. John Dollard research files for “fear and courage under battle conditions.” Box 1, Folder 9. Abraham Lincoln Brigade Archive, Tamiment Library, New York University.Google Scholar
Horton, D. (1942, June 26). Interview with Volunteer XG. John Dollard research files for “fear and courage under battle conditions.” Box 1, Folder 11. Abraham Lincoln Brigade Archive, Tamiment Library, New York University.Google Scholar
Horton, D. (1942, July 3). Interview with Volunteer XK. John Dollard research files for “fear and courage under battle conditions.” Box 1, Folder 15. Abraham Lincoln Brigade Archive, Tamiment Library, New York University.Google Scholar
Horton, D. (1942, July 9). Interview with Volunteer XN. John Dollard research files for “fear and courage under battle conditions.” Box 1, Folder 18. Abraham Lincoln Brigade Archive, Tamiment Library, New York University.Google Scholar
Hull, C.L. (1935–1936). Idea book 16. Original ideas on things in general. The Clark L. Hull Papers, Manuscripts and Archives, Yale University Library.Google Scholar
Hull, C.L.& Mowrer, O.H. (1936–1938). Hull's Psychological seminars 1936-1938. Notices and abstracts of proceedings. Library of the School of Medicine, Yale University.Google Scholar
M., (1942, July 7). Interview with Volunteer XL. John Dollard research files for “fear and courage under battle conditions.” Box 1, Folder 16. Abraham Lincoln Brigade Archive, Tamiment Library, New York University.Google Scholar
Osborn, F.H. (1944). Undated memorandum to the orientation officers. John Dollard research files for “fear and courage under battle conditions.” Box 1, Folder 1. Abraham Lincoln Brigade Archive, Tamiment Library, New York University.Google Scholar
Bandrés, J.& Llavona, R. (1996). La psicología en los campos de concentración de Franco. Psicothema, 8(1), 1–11.Google Scholar
Bendersky, S.G. (2007). “Panic”: The impact of Le Bon's crowd psychology on U.S. military thought. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 43(3), 257–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpintero, H. (1984). The impact of Spanish Civil War on Spanish scientific psychology. Revista de Historia de la Psicología, 5, 91–97.Google Scholar
Carpintero, H.& Lafuente, E. (2008). The congress that never was: The Madrid International Congress (1936). History of Psychology, 11, 220–238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carroll, P.N. (1994). The Odyssey of the Abraham Lincoln Brigade: Americans in the Spanish Civil War. Stanford, Cal.: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dollard, J. (1942). Victory over fear. New York: Reynal and Hitchcock.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dollard, J. (1943). Fear in battle. New Haven, CT: Institute of Human Relations, Yale University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dollard, J., Doob, L., Miller, N.E., Mowrer, O.H.& Sears, R. (1939). Frustration and aggression. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dollard, J.& Miller, N.E. (1950). Personality and psychotherapy. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Finison, L.J. (1977). Psychologists and Spain: a historical note. American Psychologist, 32, 1080–1084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freud, S. (1926/1959). Inhibitions, symptoms and anxiety. In Strachey, James (Ed.). The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 20, 87–172). London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
G. V., (1944). The Mind in combat, a review of Dr. Mira's Psychology in War and Dr. Dollard's Fear in Battle. Infantry Journal, February 1944, 52–55.Google Scholar
Glover, E. (1940). The psychology of fear and courage. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Gondra, J.M. (2008). El Instituto de Relaciones Humanas de la Universidad de Yale y la Brigada Abraham Lincoln: Las entrevistas sobre el miedo a los voluntarios de la Guerra de Espaa. Revista de Historia de la Psicología, 29(3–4), 93–100.Google Scholar
Healy, W., Bronner, A.& Browers, A. (1930). The structure and meaning of Psychoanalysis. New York: A Knopf.Google Scholar
Hovland, C.I. (1937). Differences in resolution of approach-approach and avoidance-avoidance conflicts. Psychological Bulletin, 34, 719.Google Scholar
Lawson, F (1989). The Abraham Lincoln Brigade. New York: Thomas I. Crowell.Google Scholar
Lubeck, I. (1986). Fifty years of frustration and aggression: some historical notes on a long-lived hypothesis. In Larsen, K.S. (Ed.). Dialectics and ideology in psychology, (30–84). Norwood, NJ.: Ablex Pub.Co.Google Scholar
May, M.A. (1949). Towards a science of human behavior – A survey of the work of the Institute of Human Relations through 2 decades, 1929-1949. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
May, M.A. (1971). A retrospective view of the Institute of Human Relations at Yale. Cross-Cultural Research, 6, 141–172.Google Scholar
May, M.A.& Doob, L. (1937). Competition and cooperation. New York: Social Science Research Council.Google Scholar
May, W.M. (1978). A psychologist of many hats: A tribute to Mark Arthur May. American Psychologist, 33, 653–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, N.E. (1937). Analysis of the form of conflict reactions. Psychological Bulletin, 34, 720.Google Scholar
Miller, N.E. (1941). An experimental investigation of acquired drives. Psychological Bulletin, 38, 534–535.Google Scholar
Miller, N.E. (1944). Experimental studies of conflict. In Hunt, J. McV. (Ed.). Personality and behavior disorders (Vol. 1, 431–465). New York: Ronald Press.Google Scholar
Miller, N.E. (1948). Studies of fear as an acquirable drive: I. Fear as motivation and fear-reduction as reinforcement in the learning of new responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology 38, 89–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, N.E. (1982). John Dollard (1900-1980). American Psychologist, 37(5), 587–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, N.E.& Dollard, J. (1941). Social learning and imitation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mira, y López, E. (1943). Psychiatry in war. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Montoro, L.& Quintanilla, I. (1982). El Congreso Internacional de Psicología de Madrid. Revista de Historia de la Psicología, 3, 223–230.Google Scholar
Morawski, J.G. (1986). Organizing knowledge and human behavior at Yale's Institute of Human Relations. Isis, 77, 219–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mowrer, O.H. (1937). Reaction to conflict as a function of past experience. Psychological Bulletin, 34, 720.Google Scholar
Mowrer, O.H. (1939). A stimulus-response analysis of anxiety and its role as a reinforcing agent. Psychological Review, 46, 553–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mowrer, O.H. (1940). Anxiety-reduction and learning. Journal of experimental Psychology, 27, 497–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sears, R.R. (1937). Resolution of conflicts between approach and avoidance responses. Psychological Bulletin, 34, 719–720.Google Scholar
Sears, R.R. (1985). Psychoanalysis and behavior theory: 1907-1965. In Koch, S. & Leary, D.E. (Eds.). A century of psychology as a science. (208–220). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Stouffer, S.A., Lumsdaine, A.A., Lumsdaine, M.H., William, R.M., Smith, M.B., James, I.L., Star, S.A.& Cottrel, L.S. (1949). The American Soldier, 2: Combat and its aftermath. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Vernon, P.E. (1941). Psychological effects of air-raids. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 36, 457–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viseltear, A.J. (1984). Milton C. Winternitz and the Yale Institute of Human Relations: A brief chapter in the history of social medicine. The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 57, 869–889.Google Scholar
Watson, J.B. (1927). The myth of the unconscious: A behavioristic explanation. Harper's Monthly Magazine, 155, 502–508.Google Scholar