Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T05:34:00.122Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Judicial Deference and Executive Control Over Administrative Agencies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

Gbemende Johnson*
Affiliation:
Hamilton College, Clinton, NY, USA
*
Gbemende Johnson, Hamilton College, 198 College Hill Road, Clinton, NY 13323, USA. Email: gxjohnso@hamilton.edu

Abstract

Do judges defer to executives with increased institutional control over the executive branch? Administrative agencies play a key role in the policy implementation process. Executives could view aggressive judicial review of executive branch activity as a threat to executive power and negatively respond to perceived judicial intrusions. Governors across the country possess varying amounts of institutional authority over the agencies that comprise their states' executive branches. For example, in many states, executive branch officials are elected by the public or appointed by someone other than the governor. Increased fragmentation increases the difficulty of centralized management and decreases gubernatorial influence over the executive branch. I examine whether state supreme courts defer more to agencies in states where governors have more formal control over the executive branch. I find that state supreme courts are more likely to rule in favor of state administrative agencies in states where the governor has increased appointment power and increased power to review agency rulemaking.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alvarez, Lizette. 2011. “Facing Flurry of Lawsuit, a Governor Loses a Round.” The New York Times, August 17. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/17/us/17florida.html?_r=1 (accessed August 15, 2013).Google Scholar
Barrilleaux, Charles. 1999. “Governors, Bureaus, and State Policymaking.” State and Local Government Review 31(1): 5359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyle, Thad L., and Muchmore, Lynn R., eds. 1983. Being Governor: The View from the Office. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Blair, Diane K. 1983. “The Gubernatorial Appointment Power: Too Much of a Good Thing.” In Being Governor: The View from the Office, eds. Beyle, Thad L. and Muchmore, Lynn R.. Durham: Duke Press Policy Studies, 116–23.Google Scholar
Boyea, Brent D. 2007. “Linking Judicial Selection to Consensus. An Analysis of Ideological Diversity.” American Politics Research 35(5):643670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brace, Paul, and Boyea, Brent. 2008. “State Public Opinion, the Death Penalty, and the Practice of Electing Judges. American Journal of Political Science 52:2(360372).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brace, Paul, and Hall, Melinda G.. 1995. “Studying Courts Comparatively: The View from the American States.” Political Research Quarterly 48(1): 529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brace, Paul, Hall, Melinda G., and Langer, 1999. “Judicial Choice and the Politics of Abortion: Institutions, Context, and the Autonomy of Courts.” Albany Law Review 62: 12651304.Google Scholar
Brudney, Jeffrey L., and Ted Hebert, F.. 1987. “State Agencies and Their Environments: Examining the Influence of Important External Actors.” The Journal of Politics 49(1): 186206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldarone, Richard P., Canes-Wrone, Brandice, and Clark, Tom S.. 2009. “Partisan Labels and Democratic Accountability: An Analysis of State Supreme Court Abortion Decisions.” The Journal of Politics 71(2): 560–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canon, Bradley C., and Giles, Michel. 1972. “Recurring Litigants: Federal Agencies before the Supreme Court.” Western Political Quarterly 25:183–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caruson, Kiki, and Michael Bitzer, J.. 2004. “At the Crossroads of Policymaking: Executive Politics, Administrative Action, and Judicial Deference by the DC Circuit Court of Appeals (1985-1996).” Law & Policy 26(3–4): 347–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, Yoo-Sung, Cho, Chung-Lae, and Wright, Deil S.. 2004. “Administrative Autonomy among American State Agencies: An Empirical Analysis of Fragmentation and Functionalism.” International Journal of Public Administration 27(6): 373–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Tom. S. 2009. “The Separation of Powers, Court-Curbing and Judicial Legitimacy.” American Journal of Political Science 53(4): 971–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Linda R., and Spitzer, Matthew L.. 1996. “Judicial Deference to Agency Action: A Rational Choice Theory and Empirical Test.” Southern California Law Review 69(2): 431–76.Google Scholar
Conant, James K. 1988. “In the Shadow of Wilson and Brownlow: Executive Branch Reorganization in the States, 1965-1987.” Public Administration Review 48(5): 892902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowley, Donald W. 1987. “Judicial Review of Administrative Agencies: Does the Type of Agency Matter?Western Political Quarterly 40(2): 265–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, James W., and Hartley, Roger E.. 2001. “Judicial Independence and State Court Budget Strategies: Clues from Oklahoma and Virginia.” Administration & Society 33:5478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, James W., and Hartley, Roger E.. 2003. “The Politics of Court Budgeting in the States: Is Judicial Independence Threatened?Public Administration Review 63:441–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Lee, and Knight, Jack. 1998. The Choices Justices Make. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
Farole, Donald J. 1999. “Reexamining Litigant Success in State Supreme Courts.” Law & Society Review 33(4): 1043–58.Google Scholar
Ferejohn, John. 1999. “Independent Judges, Dependent Judiciary: Explaining Judicial Independence.” Southern California Law Review 72:353–84.Google Scholar
Ferejohn, John, and Kramer, Larry. 2002. “Institutionalizing Judicial Restraint.” New York University Law Review 77:9621038.Google Scholar
Garnett, James L. 1980. Reorganizing State Government: The Executive Branch. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
George, Tracey E., and Epstein, Lee. 1992. “On the Nature of Supreme Court Decision-Making.” American Political Science Review 86:323–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L. 1989. “Understandings of Justice: Institutional Legitimacy, Procedural Justice, and Political Tolerance.” Law & Society Review 23(3): 469–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L. 2008. “Challenges to the Impartiality of State Supreme Courts: Legitimacy Theory and ‘New-Style’ Judicial Campaigns.” American Political Science Review 102(1): 5975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grady, Dennis O., and Simon, Kathleen M.. 2002. “Political Restraints and Bureaucratic Discretion: The Case of State Government Rule Making.” Politics & Policy 30(4): 646–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greco, Gary J. 1994. “Standards of Safeguards: A Survey of the Delegation Doctrine in the States.” Administrative Law Journal of the American University 8(3): 567603.Google Scholar
Gunther, Gerald. 1984. “Congressional Power to Curtail Federal Court Jurisdiction: An Opinionated Guide to the Ongoing Debate.” Stanford Law Review 36(4): 895922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Melinda G. 1992. “Electoral Politics and Strategic Voting in State Supreme Courts.” The Journal of Politics 54(2): 427–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanssen, F. Andrew. 1999. “Appointed Courts, Elected Courts, and Public Utility Commissions: Judicial Independence and the Energy Crisis.” Business and Politics 1:179201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanssen, F. Andrew. 2000. “Independent Courts and Administrative Agencies: An Empirical Analysis of the States.” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 16(2): 534–71.Google Scholar
Howell, William. 2003. Power without Persuasion: The Politics of Direct Presidential Action. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harden, Jeffrey J. 2011. “A Bootstrap Method for Conducting Statistical Inference with Clustered Data.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 11(2):223246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Charles. 1979. “Judicial Decisions and Organization Change: Some Theoretical and Court Decisions and State Administrative Agencies.” Law & Society Review 14(1): 2756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katyal, Neal K. 2006. “Institutional Separation of Powers: Checking Today's Most Dangerous Branch from within.” Yale Law Journal 115(9): 2314–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerwin, Cornelius. 2003. Rulemaking: How Government Agencies Write Law and Make Policy. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Langer, Laura. 2002. Judicial Review in State Supreme Courts: A Comparative Study. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, David. 2005. “Staffing Alone: Unilateral Action and the Politicization of the Executive Office of the President, 1988-2004.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 35(3): 496514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David. 2008. The Politics of Presidential Appointments: Political Control and Bureaucratic Performance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, William P. 2006. “Break up the Presidency-Governors, State Attorneys, General and Lessons from the Divided Executive.” Yale Law Journal 115(9): 2446–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Banks P. 2009. “State Success in State Supreme Courts: Judges, Litigants and State Solicitors” Ph.D. diss. Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Moe, Terry, and Howell, William. 1999. “Unilateral Action and Presidential Power: A Theory.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 29(4): 853–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Association of Attorneys General. 1996. Selected Statistics on the Office of Attorney General. Raleigh, NC: Committee on the Office of Attorneys General.Google Scholar
Rossi, Jim. 1999. “Institutional Design and the Lingering Legacy of Antifederalist Separation of Powers Ideals in the States.” Vanderbilt Law Review 52:1167–240.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A., Westerland, Chad, and Lindquist, Stefanie A.. 2011. “Congress, the Supreme Court, and Judicial Review: Testing a Constitutional Separation of Powers Model.” American Journal of Political Science 55(1): 89104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidenfeld, Mark. 2001. “The Psychology of Accountability and Political Review of Agency Rules.” Duke Law Review 51:1059–95.Google Scholar
Sheehan, Reginald. 1992. “Federal Agencies and the Supreme Court: An Analysis of Litigation Outcomes, 1953–1988.” American Politics Research 20:478500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepherd, Joanna. 2009. “Are Appointed Judges Strategic Too?Duke Law Journal 58:1589–626.Google Scholar
Smith, Joseph L. 2007. “Presidents, Justices, and Deference to Administrative Action.” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 23(2): 346–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiller, Pablo T., and Tiller, Emerson H.. 1997. “Decision Costs and the Strategic Design of Administrative Process and Judicial Review.” The Journal of Legal Studies 26(2): 347–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spriggs, James F. 1996. “The Supreme Court and Federal Administrative Agencies: A Resource-Based Theory and Analysis of Judicial Impact.” American Journal of Political Science 40(4): 1122–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, Peverill. 2007. “Measuring State Legislative Professionalism: The Squire Index Revisited.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 7:211–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephenson, Matthew C. 2004. “Mixed Signals: Reconsidering the Political Economy of Judicial Deference to Administrative.” Administrative Law Review 56(3): 657738.Google Scholar
Straussman, Jeffrey D. 1986. “Courts and Public Purse Strings: Have Portraits of Budgeting Missed Something?Public Administration Review 46(4): 345–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swanson, Rick. A. 2001. “State Supreme Court Oversight of State Administrative Agencies.” Ph.D. diss. University of Kentucky.Google Scholar
The Book of the States. 2010. Lexington, KY: The Council of State Governments.Google Scholar
Tiller, Emerson H., and Spiller, Pablo T.. 1999. “Strategic Instruments: Legal Structure and Political Games in Administrative Law.” Journal of Law, Economics & Organization 15(2): 349–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, Stanton, Cartwright, Bliss, Kagan, Robert A., and Friedman, Lawrence M.. 1987. “Do the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead? Winning and Losing in State Supreme Courts, 1870-1970.” Law & Society Review 21(3): 403–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiley v. Scott. 2011.79 So. 3d 702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiseman, Alan. 2009. “Delegation and Positive-Sum Bureaucracies.” The Journal of Politics 71(3): 9981014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woods, Neal D. 2004. “Political Influence on Agency Rule Making: Examining the Effects of Legislative and Gubernatorial Rule Review Powers.” State and Local Government Review 36(3): 170–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woods, Neal D., and Baranowski, Michael. 2007. “Governors and the Bureaucracy: Executive Resources as Sources of Administrative Influence.” International Journal of Public Administration 30(11): 1219–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yates, Jeffrey. 2002. Popular Justice: Presidential Prestige and Executive Success in the Supreme Court. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar