Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:04:58.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Measuring Public Corruption in the American States: A Survey of State House Reporters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

Richard T. Boylan  and
Cheryl X. Long
Richard T. Boylan
Affiliation:
University of Alabama
Cheryl X. Long
Affiliation:
Colgate University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We use a survey of State House reporters to measure corruption in state government and assess the priority federal prosecutors place on corruption investigations. The reliability and validity of the corruption measures are assessed, as are the relationships among corruption level, federal prosecutorial effort, and the number of federal prosecutions. Federal corruption prosecutions are positively correlated with both corruption and prosecutorial effort. Hence, we argue that federal prosecution data provide a potentially biased and unreliable measure of state public corruption.

Type
Research Article
Information
State Politics & Policy Quarterly , Volume 3 , Issue 4 , Winter 2003 , pp. 420 - 438
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ades, Alberto, and Tella, Rafael Di. 1999. “Rents, Competition and Corruption.” American Economic Review 89:982–993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alt, James, and Lassen, David Dreyer. 2002. “The Political Economy of Institutions and Corruption in American States.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Public Choice Society, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
Alt, James, Lassen, David Dreyer, and Skilling, David. 2002. “Fiscal Transparency, Gubernatorial Popularity, and the Scale of Government: Evidence from the States.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 2:230–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, J. Scott. 1975. “Monetary Incentives in Mail Surveys.” Public Opinion Quarterly 39:111–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunetti, Aymo, Kisunko, Gregory, and Weder, Beatrice. 1997. “Institutional Obstacles to Doing Business: Region-by-Region Results for a Worldwide Survey of the Private Sector.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 1759. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Bureau of Justice Statistics. 2000. National Corrections Reporting Program, 1997. Ann Arbor, MI: Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research.Google Scholar
Cronbach, L. J. 1951. “Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests.” Psychometrika 2:151–160.Google Scholar
Dillman, Don A. 1972. “Increasing Mail Questionnaire Responses for Large Samples of the General Public.” Public Opinion Quarterly 35:254–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillman, Don A. 1978. Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. New York: Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Dillman, Don A. 1983. “Mail and Self-Administered Surveys.” In Handbook of Survey Studies, eds. Rossi, Peter H., Wright, James D., and Anderson, Andy B.. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Dillman, Don A. 1991. “The Design and Administration of Mail Surveys.” Annual Review of Sociology 17:225–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillman, Don A., Christenson, James A., Carpenter, Edwin H., and Brooks, Ralph M.. 1974. “Increasing Mail Questionnaire Response: A Four-State Comparison.” American Sociological Review 39:744–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillman, Don A., and Frey, James H.. 1974. “Contribution of Personalization to Mail Questionnaire Response as an Element of a Previously Tested Method.” Journal of Applied Psychology 59:297–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisman, Raymond, and Gatti, Roberta. 2002. “Decentralization and Corruption: Evidence across Countries.” Journal of Public Economics 83:325–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Richard J., Crask, Melvin R., and Kim, Jonghoon. 1988. “Mail Survey Response Rate: A Meta-Analysis of Selected Techniques for Inducing Response.” Public Opinion Quarterly 52:467–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goel, Rajeev K., and Nelson, Michael A.. 1998. “Corruption and Government Size: A Disaggregated Analysis.” Public Choice 97:107–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grembowski, David. 1985. “Survey Questionnaire Salience (Letter).” American Journal of Public Health 75:1350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heberlein, Thomas A., and Baumgartner, Robert. 1978. “Factors Affecting Response Rates to Mailed Questionnaires: A Comprehensive Literature Review.” American Sociological Review 43:447–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, Jeanine H., and Bolstein, Richard. 1992. “Large Monetary Incentives and Their Effect on Mail Survey Response Rates.” Public Opinion Quarterly 56:442–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Simon, Kaufmann, Daniel, and Zoido-Lobaton, Pablo. 1998. “Regulatory Discretion and the Unofficial Economy.” American Economic Review 88:387–392.Google Scholar
Krysan, Maria, Schuman, Howard, Scott, Lesli Jo, and Beatty, Paul. 1994. “Response Rates and Response Content in Mail versus Face-to-Face Surveys.” Public Opinion Quarterly 58:381–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauro, Paolo. 1995. “Corruption and Growth.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 110:681–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauro, Paolo. 1998. “Corruption and the Composition of Government Expenditure.” Journal of Public Economics 69:263–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, Kenneth J., and Holbrook, Thomas. 1992. “I Seen My Opportunities and I Took 'em: Political Corruption in the American States.” Journal of Politics 54:135–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunnally, J. C., and Bernstein, I. H.. 1994. Psychometric Theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Omnigraphics, Inc. 1997. Government Phone Book USA. 5th ed. Detroit, MI: Omnigraphics, Inc.Google Scholar
Peters, John G., and Welch, Susan. 1978. “Politics, Corruption and Political Culture: A View from the State Legislature.” American Politics Quarterly 6: 345–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Public Integrity Section. 1991. Report to Congress on the Activities and Operations of the Public Integrity Section for 1990. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, Thomas, and Meier, Kenneth J.. 2002. “The Targeting of Political Corruption in the United States.” In Political Corruption, eds. Heidenheimer, Arnold and Johnston, Michael. 3rd ed. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Scott, Christopher. 1961. “Research on Mail Surveys.” Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series A 124:144–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SRDS Media Solutions. 1998a. SRDS Radio Advertising Source. Des Plaines, IL: SRDS Media Solutions.Google Scholar
SRDS Media Solutions. 1998b. SRDS TV & Cable Source. Des Plaines, IL: SRDS Media Solutions.Google Scholar
Treisman, Daniel. 2000. “The Causes of Corruption: A Cross-National Study.” Journal of Public Economics 76:399–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Jessica C. 2000. “State House Reporters: Their Unofficial Role in the Governmental Process.” http://www.lib.niu.edu/ipo/ii7504118.html.Google Scholar