Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-28T23:44:12.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Note on the Dynamics and Idiosyncrasies of Gubernatorial Popularity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

Greg D. Adams  and
Peverill Squire
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We examine the effects of state economic conditions on gubernatorial popularity using time-series analyses of gubernatorial approval ratings for 10 states. We find that although unemployment rates affect some governors' approval ratings, the dynamics of gubernatorial approval are highly idiosyncratic. Our results suggest that a single model may be inadequate to describe patterns of public approval, even for candidates elected to similar offices. The unique personal characteristics of the officeholder, as well as differing constituent expectations, may be at least as important as the general economic variables typically included in models of public approval.

Type
Research Article
Information
State Politics & Policy Quarterly , Volume 1 , Issue 4 , Winter 2001 , pp. 380 - 393
Copyright
Copyright © 2001 The American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkeson, Lonna Rae, and Partin, Randall W.. 1995. “Economic and Referendum Voting: A Comparison of Gubernatorial and Senatorial Elections.” American Political Science Review 89:99–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel. 1991. “Comparing Dynamic Specifications: The Case of Presidential Approval.” Political Analysis 3:51–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brody, Richard A. 1991. Assessing the President. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Chappell, Henry W., and Keech, William R.. 1985. “A New View of Political Accountability for Economic Performance.” American Political Science Review 79:10–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chubb, John E. 1988. “Institutions, the Economy, and the Dynamics of State Elections.” American Political Science Review 82:133–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, George C. III, Mitchell, William, and Welch, Reed. 1995. “Explaining Presidential Approval: The Significance of Issue Salience.” American Journal of Political Science 39:108–134.Google Scholar
Hansen, Susan B. 1999. “‘Life is Not Fair’: Governors' Job Performance Ratings and State Economies.” Political Research Quarterly 52:167–188.Google Scholar
Hibbs, Douglas. 1987. The American Political Economy: Macroeconomics and Electoral Politics in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Holbrook-Provow, Thomas M. 1987. “National Forces in Gubernatorial Elections.” American Politics Quarterly 15:471–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenney, Patrick J. 1983. “The Effects of State Economic Conditions on the Vote for Governor.” Social Science Quarterly 64:154–162.Google Scholar
Kenney, Patrick J., and Rice, Tom W.. 1983. “Popularity and the Vote: The Gubernatorial Case.” American Politics Quarterly 11:237–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kernell, Samuel H. 1978. “Explaining Presidential Popularity.” American Political Science Review 72:506–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kone, Susan L., and Winters, Richard F.. 1993. “Taxes and Voting: Electoral Retribution in the American States.” Journal of Politics 55:22–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leyden, Kevin M., and Borrelli, Stephen A.. 1995. “The Effect of State Economic Conditions on Gubernatorial Elections: Does Unified Government Make a Difference?” Political Research Quarterly 48:275–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKuen, Michael B. 1983. “Political Drama, Economic Conditions, and the Dynamics of Presidential Popularity.” American Journal of Political Science 27:165–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKuen, Michael B., Erikson, Robert S., and Stimson, James A.. 1992. “Peasants or Bankers? The American Electorate and the U.S. Economy.” American Political Science Review 86:597–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Warren E., and Merrill Shanks, J.. 1982. “Policy Directions and Presidential Leadership: Alternative Interpretations of the 1980 Presidential Election.” British Journal of Political Science 12:357–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minneapolis Star Tribune. 2000. “Ventura's First Two Years in Office,” 31 December.Google Scholar
Mueller, John E. 1973. War, Presidents, and Public Opinion. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Niemi, Richard G., Stanley, Harold W., and Vogel, Ronald J.. 1995. “State Economies and State Taxes: Do Voters Hold Governors Accountable?” American Journal of Political Science 39:936–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niemi, Richard G., Beyle, Thad, and Sigelman, Lee. 2000. “U.S. Official Job Approval Ratings,” Internet dataset. <http://www.unc.edu/~beyle/jars.html>..>Google Scholar
Ostrom, Charles W. Jr., and Simon, Dennis M.. 1985. “Promise and Performance: A Dynamic Model of Presidential Popularity.” American Political Science Review 79:334–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, Charles W. Jr., and Simon, Dennis M.. 1988. “The President's Public.” American Journal of Political Science 32:1096–1119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, Charles W. Jr., and Simon, Dennis M.. 1989. “The Man in the Teflon Suit? The Environmental Connection, Political Drama, and Popular Support in the Reagan Presidency.” Public Opinion Quarterly 53:353–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Partin, Randall W. 1995. “Economic Conditions and Gubernatorial Elections: Is the State Executive Held Accountable?” American Politics Quarterly 23:81–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peltzman, Sam. 1987. “Economic Conditions and Gubernatorial Elections.” American Economic Review 77:293–297.Google Scholar
Shanks, J. Merrill, and Miller, Warren E.. 1990. “Policy Directions and Performance Evaluation: Complementary Evaluations of the Reagan Elections.” British Journal of Political Science 20:143–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, Peverill, and Fastnow, Christina. 1994. “Comparing Gubernatorial and Senatorial Elections.” Political Research Quarterly 47:705–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stimson, James A. 1976. “Public Support for American Presidents: A Cyclical Model.” Public Opinion Quarterly 40:1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svoboda, Craig J. 1995. “Retrospective Voting in Gubernatorial Elections: 1982 and 1986.” Political Research Quarterly 48:135–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, Darrell. 1991. “Television and Presidential Popularity in America.” British Journal of Political Science 21:199–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yepsen, David. 1993. “Branstad: Often Confrontational, Sometimes Flexible, Still Durable,” Des Moines Register, 7 February.Google Scholar