Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T06:58:59.503Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“Why Some and Not Others?” The Determinants of the Quality and Prestige of Public Graduate Research Universities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

Kim Quaile Hill ,
K. Jurée Capers  and
Carla Flink
Kim Quaile Hill*
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
K. Jurée Capers
Affiliation:
Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA
Carla Flink
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
*
Kim Quaile Hill, Texas A&M University, 4348 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843-4348, USA. Email: kimhill@tamu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We offer the first systematic assessment of the factors thought to account for the quality and prestige of public research universities in the United States. We take account, too, of those potential causal factors identified in both contemporary and early descriptive research on these institutions. Our findings indicate that attributes of universities and their states from the first half of the twentieth century as well as some of their contemporary attributes are powerful predictors of their success in National Research Council peer evaluations of their research programs. The results provide a foundation for efforts to account systematically for the research achievements of these universities and evidence on state public policy influences on those research achievements.

Keywords

higher educationgraduate research universitiesresearch prestigestate public policy
Type
Research Article
Information
State Politics & Policy Quarterly , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , March 2014 , pp. 29 - 49
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arceneaux, Kevin, and Nickerson, David W.. 2009. “Modeling Certainty with Clustered Data: A Comparison of Methods.” Political Analysis 17(Spring): 177–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berdahl, Robert O. 1971. Statewide Coordination of Higher Education. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.Google Scholar
Berelson, Bernard. 1960. Graduate Education in the United States. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Berry, William D., Berkman, Michael B., and Schneiderman, Stuart. 2000. “Legislative Professionalism and Incumbent Reelection.” American Political Science Review 94(December): 859–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, William D., Ringquist, Evan, Fording, Richard C., and Hanson, Russell L.. 1998. “Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States, 1960–93.” American Journal of Political Science 42(January): 327–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bibby, John F., and Holbrook, Thomas M.. 1996. “Parties and Elections.” In Politics in the American States, eds. Gray, Virginia and Jacob, Herbert. 6th ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 78–121.Google Scholar
Blau, Peter M. 1973. The Organization of Academic Work. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Bowen, William G., Kurzweil, Martin A., and Tobin, Eugene M., 2005. Equity and Excellence in American Higher Education. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. Colin, Gelbach, Konah B., and Miller, Douglas L.. 2008. “Bootstrap-Based Improvements for Inference with Clustered Errors.” Review of Economics and Statistics 90(August): 414–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foundation, Carnegie. 1994. A Classification of Institutions of Higher Education. Princeton.Google Scholar
Cartter, Allan M. 1966. An Assessment of Quality in Graduate Education. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chernick, Michael R. 2008. Bootstrap Methods: A Guide for Practitioners and Researchers. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Cole, Jonathan R. 2009. The Great American University. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
Committee on Prospering in the Global Economy of the 21st Century. 2007. Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Council of State Governments. 1990. The Book of the States, 1990–91. Lexington.Google Scholar
Doyle, William R. 2007. “Public Opinion, Partisan Identification, and Higher Education Policy.” Journal of Higher Education 78(July–August): 369–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dusansky, Richard, and Vernon, Clayton J.. 1998. “Rankings of U.S. Economics Departments.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 12(Winter): 157–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dye, Thomas R. 1966. Politics, Economics, and the Public. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Elam, Stanley M. 1978. A Decade of Gallup Polls of Attitudes toward Education. Bloomington: Phi Delta Kappa.Google Scholar
Elazar, Daniel J. 1984. American Federalism. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Elazar, Daniel J. 1994. The American Mosaic. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
Geiger, Roger L. 1986. To Advance Knowledge: The Growth of American Graduate Research Universities, 1900–1940. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Glenn, David. 2010. “A Critic Sees Deep Problems in the Doctoral Rankings.” The Chronicle of Higher Education LVII(October 8): A12.Google Scholar
Goldberger, Marvin L., Maher, Brendan A., and Flattau, Pamela Ebert, eds. 1995. Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Graham, Hugh Davis, and Diamond, Nancy. 1997. The Rise of American Research Universities: Elites and Challengers in the Postwar Era. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Green, Donald P., and Vavreck, Lynn. 2008. “Analysis of Cluster-Randomized Experiments: A Comparison of Alternative Estimation Approaches.” Political Analysis 16(Spring): 138–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gujarati, Damodar, and Porter, Dawn. 2009. Basic Econometrics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Hartnett, Rodney T., Clark, Mary Jo, and Baird, Leonard L.. 1978. “Reputational Ratings of Doctoral Programs.” Science 199(March 24): 1310–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackman, Robert W., and Siverson, Randolph M.. 1996. “Rating the Rating: An Analysis of the National Research Council's Appraisal of Political Science Ph.D. Programs.” PS: Political Science & Politics 29(June): 155–60.Google Scholar
Jacobs, David. 1999. “Ascription or Productivity? The Determinants of Departmental Success in the NRC Quality Rankings.” Social Science Research 28(June): 228–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Lyle V., Lindzey, Gardner, and Coggeshall, Porter E., eds. 1982. An Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States: Social & Behavioral Sciences. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Journal of Blacks in Higher Education Research Department. 2003. “The First Black Faculty Members at the Nation's 50 Flagship State Universities.” Journal of Blacks in Higher Education 39(Spring): 118–26.Google Scholar
Kane, Thomas J., and Orszag, Peter R.. 2003. Funding Restrictions at Public Universities: Effects and Policy Implications. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Working Paper.Google Scholar
Knott, Jack H., and Abigail Payne, A.. 2004. “The Impact of State Governance Structures on Management and Performance of Public Organizations: A Study of Higher Education Institutions.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 23(1): 13–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Dan A., and Maruna, Shadd. 1999. “The Politics of Education.” In Politics in the American States, eds. Gray, Virginia, Hanson, Russell L., and Jacob, Herbert. 7th ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 393–433.Google Scholar
Maas, Cora J. M., and Hox, Joop J.. 2005. “Sufficient Sample Sizes for Multilevel Modeling.” Methodology 1(3): 86–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuinness, Aims C. Jr., Epper, Rhonda Martin, and Arredondo, Sheila. 1994. State Postsecondary Education Structures Sourcebook, 1994. Denver: Education Commission of the States.Google Scholar
McLendon, Michael K., Hearn, James C., and Mokher, Christine G.. 2009. “Partisans, Professionals, and Power: The Role of Political Factors in State Higher Education Funding.” Journal of Higher Education 80(November/December): 686–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millett, John D. 1965. “State Planning for Higher Education.” Educational Record XLVI(Summer): 223–30.Google Scholar
Moos, Malcolm, and Rourke, Francis E.. 1959. The Campus and the State. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Morphew, Christopher C., and Eckel, Peter D., eds. 2009. Privatizing the Public University. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
National Research Council. 2010a. A Data-Based Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
National Research Council. 2010b. A Revised Guide to the Methodology of the Data-Based Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 2000. Bowling Alone. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Salisbury, Robert H. 1965. “State Politics and Education.” In Politics in the American States, eds. Jacob, Herbert and Vines, Kenneth N.. New York: Little, Brown. 359-411.Google Scholar
Savageau, David, and Loftus, Geoffrey. 1997. Places Rated Almanac. 5th ed. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sharkansky, Ira. 1969. “The Utility of Elazar's Political Culture: A New Measure.” Polity 2(Autumn): 66–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1951. State Government Finance, 1951. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1954. Statistical Abstract of the United States, 1954. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1993. State Government Finances, 1992. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1995. Statistical Abstract of the United States, 1995. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
U.S. News and World Report. 2009. America's Best Colleges. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Volkwein, J. Fredericks. 1986. “Campus Autonomy and Its Relationship to Measures of University Quality.” Journal of Higher Education 57(September/October): 510–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volkwein, J. Fredericks. 1989. “Changes in Quality among Public Universities.” Journal of Higher Education 60(March/April): 136–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volkwein, J. Fredericks, and Malik, Shaukat M.. 1997. “State Regulation and Administrative Flexibility at Public Universities.” Research in Higher Education 38(1): 17–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar