Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T23:23:28.343Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Doctors, Demons and Early Methodist Healing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2016

Henry D. Rack
Henry D. Rack*
Affiliation:
University of Manchester
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Methodist historians have naturally tended to emphasise the reasonableness and sobriety of their founder and his followers, the social as well as the spiritual benefits they produced. The elements of irrationality and what some will see as religious hysteria in the movement have been played down. Non-methodists have been less reticent. Methodist ‘enthusiasm’ was a popular target in the eighteenth century and the charges made, however one-sided and exaggerated, had a solid basis in fact. They were to be repeated with varying degrees of distaste and disapproval by writers such as Southey; or in more balanced accounts like that of Lecky. Even the sympathetic Alexander Knox who had known Wesley personally, perceptively remarked that ‘he would have been an enthusiast if he could’. Ronald Knox suspected that the rational controls in Wesley’s mind were only superficial: he was easily swayed on supernatural phenomena ‘when the evidence supported views which he wanted to be true’. A taste for religious excitement and credulity about the supernatural were often even more marked among his followers, especially the ordinary membership.

Type
Research Article
Information
Studies in Church History , Volume 19: The Church and Healing , 1982 , pp. 137 - 152
Copyright
Copyright © Ecclesiastical History Society 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Lavington, George, The Enthusiasm of Methodists and Papists Compared 3 vols (London 1749–51)Google Scholar; Lyles, A. M., Methodism Mocked (London 1960) cap 2.Google Scholar

2 Southey, [R.], [The Life of Wesley] ed Fitzgerald, M. H. 2 vols (London 1925) 2 pp 227–32.Google Scholar

3 Lecky, W. E. H., A History of England in the Eighteenth Century 7 vols (new ed London I H92) 3 pp 77–97 Google Scholar.

4 ‘Remarks on the Life and Character of John Wesley’ in Southey 2 p 357.

5 Knox, R., Enthusiasm (London 1949) p 517.Google Scholar

6 Plumb, J.H., England in the Eighteenth Century (repr Harmondsworth 1963) pp 95–6.Google Scholar

7 He also ran a dispensary: Wesley, John, Journal, ed Curnock, N., 8 vols (London 1909-16) 3 pp 273, 301, 329Google Scholar; Wesley, John, Letters, ed Telford, J., 8 vols (London 1931) 2 p 307.Google Scholar

8 For what follows see Clark, [G. N.], [A History of the Royal College of Physicians of London] (Oxford 1966) vol 2 Google Scholar; King, [L. S.], [The Medical World of the Eighteenth Century] (Chicago 1958)Google Scholar caps 1 and 2; Kett, Joseph, ‘Provincial Medical Practice in England 1730-1815’ in Journal of History of Medicine 19 (1964) pp 17–29 Google ScholarPubMed. (I am indebted to Miss Stella Butler for this reference).

9 Clark 2 pp 540-3.

10 Thomas, [K.], [Religion and the Decline of Magic] (paper back edn, Harmondsworth 1973) pp 328–9.Google Scholar

11 Whiteley, J. H., Wesley’s Anglican Contemporaries (London 1939) pp 37–8 Google Scholar; McClatchey, D., Oxfordshire Clergy 1777-1869 (Oxford 1960) cap 11. She notes (p 177)Google Scholar that some clergy were qualified physicians in the 1870s.

12 Wesley, John, Letters 2 p 307.Google Scholar

13 Wesley, John, Journal 6 p 325 Google Scholar.

14 Wesley, John, Primitive Physick (2 ed enlarged. Bristol n.d.) (First published 1747) Preface; King p 39 Google Scholar classifies Wesley as ‘the best kind of empiric’.

15 Wesley, John, Letters 2 p 307.Google Scholar

16 Monthly Magazine 25 (London 1807) p 401 and 26 (1808) pp 29-31; Phillips, P., A View of Old Montgomeryshire (2 ed Swansea 1978) pp 169–70 Google Scholar. Southey 2 p 375 links Sir John Price with an incident in the life of the methodist preacher Olivers, Thomas: see Lives [of the Early Methodist Preachers] ed Jackson, T.. 6 vols (4 ed London 1871) 2 p 50.Google Scholar

17 ‘Saliva in the mouth before one’s fast is broken’ (OED). Wesley thought this ancient (and biblical) remedy cured many diseases: see Primitive Physick (23 ed London 1791)Google ScholarPubMed repred A.W. Hill (London 1960) p 126.

18 Monthly Magazine 26 (1808) pp 30, 31.

19 Ibid; Wesley, John Journal 8 p 157.Google Scholar

20 Manchester, John Rylands University Library, M[ethodist] C[hurch] A[rchives], [John] Bennet, [MS Journal], 20 September 1748, 29 March 1749.

21 Monthly Magazine 25 (1807) 401 ; Bennet 20 September 1748.

22 For Bennet’s work see Rose, E.A. ‘Methodism in Cheshire to 1800’ in Transactions of the Lancashire and Cheshire Antiquarian Society 78 (Manchester 1975) pp 22-7.Google Scholar

23 Bennet 20 September 1748. For healing by rubbing compare Valentine Greatrakes the ‘stroker’ in the 1660s (Thomas pp 240-2).

24 Quoted in Southey 2 p 375.

25 Bennet 29 March 1749; Wesley, John, Journal 8 pp 156–7.Google Scholar

26 McLachlan, H., English Education under the Test Acts (Manchester 1931) pp 132–4 Google Scholar; Ashley Smith, J.W., The Birth of Modern Education (London 1954) pp 82–3 Google Scholar on Ebenezer Lathom, tutor at Findern Academy where Bennet was educated.

27 Bolam, C.G. and others, The English Presbyterians (London 1968) pp 137–8.Google Scholar

28 Owen, Josiah, Dr. Deacon Try’d before his own Tribunal (Manchester 1748) pp 62–3.Google Scholar

29 Thomas pp 241-2, 576-80.

30 See notes 14 and 17; Hill, A.W., John Wesley among the Physicians (London 1958).Google Scholar

31 Hawes, William, An Examination of the Revd. Mr. John Wesley’s Primitive Physick (London 1776).Google Scholar

32 Church, Leslie, More About the Early Methodist People (London 1949) pp 34–43.Google Scholar

33 Wesley, John, Letters 2 p 307 Google Scholar. The remedies cited here are in Primitive Physick (2 ed) pp 32, 82, 103, 47, 81. For the doctrine of ‘signatures’ see Thomas pp 224, 265.

34 King 34-9; Dock, G. ‘The “Primitive Physic” of Rev. John Wesley’ in Journal of American Medical Association 64 (Chicago 1915) pp 629–38.Google Scholar

35 Wesley, John, Primitive Physick (2 ed) xvii–xviii, xxiii-iv.Google Scholar

36 Wesley, John Journal 4 pp 187–8.Google Scholar

37 They include cases from the past as well as the present, such as a seventeenth-century one of leprosy where the patient, though consulting several physicians, always believed she would be healed by faith and prayer: A[rminian] M[agazine] 5 (London 1782) p 312.

38 Wesley, John, Letters 2 pp 256–64.Google Scholar

39 On the ‘evidence of competent witnesses‘ see Wesley, John, Letters 2 p 256; 8 pp 21-2Google Scholar. (I owe this last reference to Rev. Tom Albin).

40 Wesley, John, Letters 4 pp 338–46; 2 pp 241-64.Google Scholar

41 Wesley, John, Journal 6 p 334.Google Scholar

42 Fox, George, Journal ed Nickalls, J. L. (Cambridge 1952) p 27.Google ScholarPubMed

43 Minutes of Several Conversations in Wesley, John, Works, 14 vols (11 ed London 1856) p 302 Google Scholar; Wesley, John, Letters 5 p 288 Google Scholar on Matthew Lowes’s ‘balsam’.

44 Wesley, John, Letters 5 p 289.Google Scholar

45 Lives 6 pp 40, 88-9.

46 MCA, [John] Valton [MS Diary], 30 June 1788; 2 May, 17 and 18 June 1788.

47 Lives 3 p 188.

48 This was in 1781. There are three accounts of this healing: Wesley, John, Journal, 6 p 495 (12 August 1784)Google Scholar; ‘Some Account of the Life of John Pawson’ (MS in MCA) section 27 (under 1785); AM 16 (1793) pp 144-7.

49 Wesley, Charles, Journal, ed Jackson, T., 2 vols (London n.d.) 1 p 316 Google Scholar; Wesley, John. Journal 4 pp 359–60.Google Scholar

50 Wesley, Charles, Journal 1 p 314.Google Scholar

51 Lives 6 p 52.

52 Valton 30 June 1788.

53 Lives 6 pp 127-8; Valton 12 June, 1 July 1788; [Joseph] Easterbrook,[An Appeal to the Public respecting George Lukyns] (Bristol n.d. but 1788) and extract in AM 12 (1789) p 155. Easterbrook had strong methodist connections: Wesley, John Journal 8 p 47 n.Google Scholar

54 Lives 6 p 127.

55 Wesley, John, Journal 7 p 362 n.Google Scholar

56 Thomas pp 572-3.

57 Easterbrook pp 6, 9.

58 Lives 5p 271; 6pp l68-9.

59 Jollie, [T. and Carrington], J., The Surey Demoniac (London 1697)Google Scholar; Taylor, Z. The Surey Impostor (London 1697)Google Scholar; J[ollie], T., A Vindication of the Surey Demoniac as no Impostor (London 1698).Google Scholar The remarks on this case in Thomas p 585 are not entirely accurate.

60 Valton 30 June 1788.

61 As in reply to Warburton and Church (note 40).

62 Bennet 28 June 1749.

63 Wesley, John, Journal 4 pp 481–2.Google Scholar

64 For Bell see Wesley, John, Journal 4 pp 535–6, 541-2; 5 p 9Google Scholar; Southey 2 pp 179-84. Coleridge was prepared to acknowledge such causes were possible by ‘imagination’ and ‘regulated friction’ (quoted in Southey 2 p 179n.)

65 Wesley, John Journal 2 pp 136–7.Google Scholar

66 Bennet 29 June 1749 (at Stockport).

67 Even a single case of witchcraft would show supernatural intervention and thereby destroy the deists’ ‘castle in the air’: Wesley, John, Journal 5 p 265.Google Scholar

68 See notes 38 to 40 above.

69 The Surey Demoniac p 21.

70 Welsh harping and singing were said to have declined under methodist influence; The Torrington Diaries ed Andrews, C. B. (London 1934) 1 p 132 Google Scholar, but the recent study by Jenkins, G.H., Literature, Religion and Society in Wales 1660-1730) (Cardiff 1978) pp 306–8 Google Scholar suggests that popular culture and superstition were already being eroded by religious and moral pressures before the revival.