Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T06:42:15.115Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Second Byurakan Spectral Sky Survey, Quasistellar Objects and Seyfert Galaxies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2017

J.A. Stepanian ,
L.K. Erastova ,
V.A. Lipovetsky  and
A.I. Shapovalova
J.A. Stepanian
Affiliation:
Byurakan Astrophysical Observatory, 378433 Armenia, USSR
L.K. Erastova
Affiliation:
Byurakan Astrophysical Observatory, 378433 Armenia, USSR
V.A. Lipovetsky
Affiliation:
Special Astrophysical Observatory, 357147 Stavropolskij Kraj, Nizhnij Arkhys, USSR
A.I. Shapovalova
Affiliation:
Special Astrophysical Observatory, 357147 Stavropolskij Kraj, Nizhnij Arkhys, USSR

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Survey of surveys, and the place of the Second Byurakan Survey (SBS) among them is shortly discussed. Deep low-dispersion surveys cover > 10000 sq.degrees, but they managed to study only 15% of this area relatively well.

For 450 SBS objects the slit spectra were obtained on 6 m telescope of SAO. The nature of 120 QS0s,40 Sy galaxies and more than 200 ELG are confirmed. The results of the slit spectroscopy in six SBS fields covering commonly the area of ∼100 sq.degrees are presented.

All surveys, except Byurakan Surveys are extremely poor with Sy galaxies, that is their distinction from other surveys. Weak (16<m<18m5) SBS Sy galaxies sufficiently well filled in the interval between QSOs and Sy galaxies, the efficiency of selection does not much depend on redshifts. There is quite good pass from Sy galaxies to QSOs.

Type
Part 1: Surveys, Luminosity Functions, and Evolution
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 134: Active Galactic Nuclei , 1989 , pp. 31 - 34
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1989 

References

Bohuski, T.J., Fairall, A.P., Weedman, D.W., 1978, Ap.J, 221, 776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crampton, D, Schade, D, Cowley, A.P., 1985, Astron.J, 90, 987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foltz, C.B., Chaffee, F.H. Jr, Hewett, P.C., MacAlpine, G.M., Turnshek, D.A., Weymann, R.J., Anderson, S.F., 1987, Ap.J., 94, 1423.Google Scholar
Hoag, A.A., Thomas, N.G., Vaucher, B.J., 1982, Ap.J, 263, 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipovetsky, V.A., Markarian, B.E., Stepanian, J.A., 1987, Observational Evidence of Activity of Galaxies, IAU Symp.No.121, p., ed. Khachikian, E. et al, D. Reidel, Holland.Google Scholar
MacAlpine, G.M., Williams, G. A., 1981, Ap.J. Suppl., 45, 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markarian, B.E., 1967, Astrofizika, 3, 55.Google Scholar
Markarian, B.E., Stepanian, J.A., Erastova, L.K., Observational Evidence of Activity of Galaxies, IAU Symp.No.121, pp.25–35, ed. Khachikian, E. et al, D. Reidel, Holland.Google Scholar
Osmer, P.S., 1980, Ap.J. Suppl., 42, 523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osmer, P.S., Smith, M.G., 1980, Ap.J. Suppl., 42, 333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanduleak, N., Pesch, P., 1987, Ap.J. Suppl., 63, 809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, M., Schneider, D.P., Gunn, J.E., 1986, Ap.J., 310, 518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, M.G., Aguirre, G., Zemelmann, M., 1976, Ap.J. Suppl., 32, 217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar