Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T21:31:19.222Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Vector Magnetometry Using the 12-μm Emission Lines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2017

D. Deming ,
T. Hewagama ,
D. E. Jennings ,
G. McCabe  and
G. Wiedemann
D. Deming
Affiliation:
Code 693, NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, U.S.A.
T. Hewagama
Affiliation:
Hughes/STX Corporation, 4400 Forbes Boulevard, Lanham, MD 20706, U.S.A.
D. E. Jennings
Affiliation:
Code 693, NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, U.S.A.
G. McCabe
Affiliation:
Hughes/STX Corporation, 4400 Forbes Boulevard, Lanham, MD 20706, U.S.A.
G. Wiedemann
Affiliation:
European Southern Observatory, Karl-Schwarzschildstrasse 2, D-8046 Garching bei München, Germany

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Recent polarimetric observations of the 12.32-μm emission line have provided the observational basis for deriving vector magnetic fields in the upper photosphere with great sensitivity. We use a line source function from the non-LTE model of Carlsson, Rutten and Shchukina, and calculate the radiative transfer of the Stokes I, Q, U, and V profiles. The results show that the profiles are not significantly affected by magneto-optical effects or by saturation, and reliable vector fields can be extracted by simply fitting the Seares relations to the Stokes profiles. Vector field observations for sunspots have shown that the field extends well beyond the photometric boundary of the sunspot, but that the field strength at the penumbral/photospheric boundary is less than half of the sunspot-center value. Within a mature sunspot, the 12-μm line profiles contain essentially no unpolarized radiation, indicating that the field is not intermittent in the sense of containing discrete flux tubes separated by field-free regions. We describe the design of a 12-μm Stokes polarimeter incorporating a high-resolution Fabry-Perot etalon and a 128 × 128 infrared array detector.

Keywords

infrared: starsinstrumentation: polarimetersline formationSun: magnetic fields
Type
Part 5: Magnetic Fields and Infrared Magnetometry
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 154: Infrared Solar Physics , 1994 , pp. 379 - 392
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1994 

References

Adam, M.G.: 1990, Solar Phys. 125, 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckers, J.M., and Schröter, E.H.: 1969, Solar Phys. 10, 384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brault, J.W., and Noyes, R.W.: 1983, Astrophys. J. (Letters) 269, L61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlsson, M., Rutten, R.J., and Shchukina, N.G.: 1991, Astron. Astrophys. 253, 567 (CRS).Google Scholar
Chang, E.S.: 1987, Phys. Scripta 35, 792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, E.S.: 1993, these proceedings.Google Scholar
Chang, E.S., and Noyes, R.W.: 1983, Astrophys. J. (Letters) 275, L11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, E.S., and Schoenfeld, W.G.: 1991, Astrophys. J. 383, 450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, E.S., Avrett, E.H., Mauas, P.J., Noyes, R.W., and Loeser, R.: 1991, Astrophys. J. (Letters) 379, L79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deming, D., Boyle, R.J., Jennings, D.E., and Wiedemann, G.: 1988, Astrophys. J. 333, 978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gary, G.A., and Musielak, Z.E.: 1992, Astrophys. J. 392, 722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gary, G.A., Moore, R.L., Hagyard, M.J., and Haisch, B.M.: 1987, Astrophys. J. 314, 782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewagama, T.: 1991, , .Google Scholar
Hewagama, T., Deming, D., Jennings, D.E., Osherovich, V., Wiedemann, G., Zipoy, D., Mickey, D.L., and Garcia, H.: 1992, Astrophys. J. Suppl. in press.Google Scholar
Jennings, D.E., Deming, D., McCabe, G., Noyes, R., Wiedemann, G., and Espenak, F.: 1993, these proceedings.Google Scholar
Hagyard, M.J., Smith, J.B. Jr., Teuber, D., and West, E.A.: 1984, Solar Phys. 91, 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haisch, B., Strong, K.T., and Rodono, M.: 1991, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 29, 275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lites, B.W., and Skumanich, A.: 1990, Astrophys. J. 348, 747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livingston, W.: 1991, Proc. SPIE 1494, 50.Google Scholar
Maltby, P., Avrett, E.H., Carlsson, M., Kjeldseth-Moe, O., Kurucz, R.L., and Loeser, R.: 1986, Astrophys. J. 306, 284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osherovich, V.A., and Garcia, H.A.: 1989, Astrophys. J. 336, 468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, E.N.: 1979, Astrophys. J. 230, 905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabin, D.: 1992, Astrophys. J. (Letters) 390, L103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rees, D.E., Murphy, G.A., and Durrant, C.J.: 1989, Astrophys. J. 339, 1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiehr, E., and Balthasar, H.: 1989, Astron. Astrophys. 208, 303.Google Scholar
Zirin, H., and Popp, B.: 1989, Astrophys. J. 340, 571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar