Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T04:54:04.458Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

RECLAIMING THE PERFORMER'S VOICE AND BODY IN MUSICAL ANALYSIS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2020

Phoebe Green
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The most prevalent model of musical analysis goes straight from score to sound, without reference to decisions – planned or impromptu – made by the performer as they perform the score. Since 2000 performance analysis by, among others, Nicholas Cook and John Rink, has sought to bridge this gap by analysing performances of works, yet the performer's voice is still absent. Catherine Costello Hirata and Dora Hanninen attempted to capture more experiential qualities in their approach to analysis, yet here too the performer is unable to contribute. There is growing discourse featuring performers speaking about their creative process, however this is generally not framed in a formal analytical space. This article examines the landscape of musical analysis as new models emerge for analysis of the score in its performed realm. It builds on research that presented a formal performance analysis of a score in the context of a performance, and extends the model and ideas expressed to reclaim a space for the performer's experience of a score in musical analysis.

Type
RESEARCH ARTICLES
Information
Tempo , Volume 74 , Issue 292 , April 2020 , pp. 56 - 63
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Cook, Nicholas, ‘Changing the Musical Object: Approaches to Performance Analysis’, in Music's Intellectual History, ed Zdravko in Blažeković (New York: RILM, 2007), pp. 775–90Google Scholar, here 778.

2 Cook, Nicholas, A Guide to Musical Analysis (New York: W.W. Norton, 1987), p. 114Google Scholar.

3 Rink, John, ed., Musical Performance: A Guide to Understanding (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), p. 5CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Rink, John, ‘Analysis and (or?) Performance’, in Musical Performance: A Guide to Understanding, ed. Rink, John (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), pp. 35–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Cook, ‘Changing the Musical Object’, p. 779.

6 Kanno, Mieko, ‘As If the Composer is Dead’, Mortality, 17, no. 2 (2012), pp. 170–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 Gottschalk, Jennie, Experimental Music Since 1970 (New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2016), p. 81Google Scholar.

8 Green, Phoebe, Inside the Performer's Process: Exploring Four Australian Works for the Viola Through Recordings, Analysis, and Reflection (DMA exegesis, Griffith University, 2018)Google Scholar.

9 Hanninen, Dora, ‘Feldman, Analysis, Experience’, Twentieth-Century Music 1, no. 2 (2004), pp. 225–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar, here p. 228.

10 See Schick, Steven, The Percussionist's Art: Same Bed, Different Dreams (Rochester, NY: University of Manchester Press, 2006)Google Scholar.

11 Walser, Robert, ‘Popular Music Analysis: Ten Apothegms and Four Instances’, in Analyzing Popular Music, ed. Moore, Allan (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), pp. 16–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar, here p. 21–2.

12 Emmerson, Stephen, Around a Rondo: Preparing Mozart's Rondo in A minor K.511 for Performance on Fortepiano [DVD]. (Brisbane: Queensland Conservatorium Research Centre, Griffith University, 2007)Google Scholar.

13 Fitch, Fabrice and Heyde, Neil, ‘“Recercar” – The Collaborative Process as Invention’, Twentieth-Century Music 4, no. 1 (2007), pp. 71–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 Clarke, Eric, Cook, Nicholas, Harrison, Bryn and Thomas, Philip, ‘Interpretation and Performance in Bryn Harrison's être-temps’, Musicae Scientiae 9, no.1 (2005), pp. 31–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 Cook, ‘Changing the Musical Object’, p. 787.

16 Schechner, Richard, Performance Theory (New York: Routledge Classics, 2004). p. xviiiCrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 Green, Inside the Performer's Process.

18 Rink, ‘Analysis and (or?) Performance’, p. 35.

19 Tomlinson, Vanessa and Wren, Toby, eds, Here and Now: Artistic Research in Music: An Australian Perspective [ebook] (Albany, NY: Intelligent Arts, 2016), p. 63Google Scholar.

20 Gottschalk, Jennie, Experimental Music Since 1970. (New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2016), p. 89Google Scholar.

21 Brubaker, Bruce, ‘Time is Time: Temporal Signification in Music’, in Unfolding Time: Studies in Temporality in Twentieth Century Music (Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2009), pp. 95–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar, here p. 145

22 Green, Inside the Performer's Process, p. 77.

23 Cook, Nicholas, ‘Form and Syntax: A Tale of Two Terms’, in Music, Performance, Meaning (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007), pp. 241–60Google Scholar, here p. 248.

24 Cook, ‘Form and Syntax’, p. 249.