Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T02:30:53.720Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Comparative Validation of the Foulds and Bedford Hierarchy of Psychiatric Symptomatology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

Leslie C. Morey
Leslie C. Morey*
Affiliation:
Yale University School of Medicine
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

This study investigated the validity of the Fould & Bedford hierarchical model of psychiatric illness, as compared to hierarchical models based upon prevalence and severity of disorder. The DSSI was administered to 52 American psychiatric in-patients with severe disturbances. The reports of symptoms in this sample conformed to the Foulds hierarchy in 90% of cases, while 94% of cases conformed to a model based upon prevalence. When a cross-method validation was investigated, the Foulds & Bedford classification demonstrated good discriminative capacity, while models based upon prevalence and severity failed to achieve significance. These results suggest that the Foulds & Bedford model is a useful taxonomy of symptomatology in psychiatric illness.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 146 , Issue 4 , April 1985 , pp. 424 - 428
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bagshaw, V. E. & McPherson, F. M. (1978) The applicability of the Foulds and Bedford hierarchy model to mania and hypomania. British Journal of Psychiatry, 132, 293–295.Google Scholar
Bedford, A. & Foulds, G. A. (1977) Validation of the Delusions-Symptoms-States Inventory. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 50, 163–171.Google Scholar
Bedford, A. & Presly, A. S. (1978) Symptom patterns among chronic schizophrenic inpatients. British Journal of Psychiatry, 133, 176–178.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37–46.Google Scholar
Dahlstrom, W. G., Welsh, G. S., & Dahlstrom, L. E. (1972) An MMPI Handbook, Volume II: Research Applications. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Endicott, J. & Spitzer, R. L. (1978) A diagnostic interview: The schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia. Archives of General Psychiatry, 37, 837–844.Google Scholar
Foulds, G. A. (1976) The Hierarchical Nature of Personal Illness. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Foulds, G. A. & Bedford, A. (1975) Hierarchy of classes of personal illness. Psychological Medicine, 5, 181–192.Google Scholar
Foulds, G. A. Bedford, A. & Csapo, K. G. (1975) Class change in the personal illness hierarchy. British Journal of Psychiatry, 127, 316–319.Google Scholar
Gilleard, E. (1983) A cross-cultural investigation of Foulds' hierarchy model of psychiatric illness. British Journal of Psychiatry, 142, 518–523.Google Scholar
Hurry, J. & Sturt, E. (1981) Social performance in a population sample: relation to psychiatric symptoms. In What is a Case? The Problem of Definition in Psychiatric Community Surveys, (eds. Wing, J. K., Bebbington, P. E. & Robins, L.), London: Grant MacIntyre.Google Scholar
Kendell, R. E. (1975) The Role of Diagnosis in Psychiatry. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McPherson, F. M., Antram, M. C., Bagshaw, V. E. & Carmichael, S. K. (1977) A test of the hierarchical model of personal illness. British Journal of Psychiatry, 131, 56–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Overall, J. E. & Gorham, D. R. (1962) The brief psychiatric rating scale. Psychological Reports, 10, 799.Google Scholar
Sturt, E. (1981) Hierarchical patterns in the distribution of psychiatric symptoms. Psychological Medicine, 11, 783–794.Google Scholar
Surtees, P. E. & Kendell, R. E. (1979) The hierarchy model of psychiatric symptomatology: An investigation based on Present State Examination ratings. British Journal of Psychiatry, 135, 438–443.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.