Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:14:13.495Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Allport and Personality a modern view

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Hans J. Eysenck
Hans J. Eysenck*
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London SE5 8AF
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the history of any scientific discipline, certain people stand out because they effectively defined the discipline, separated it from neighbouring specialities, and gave it a local habitation and a name. Three names stand out in the history (brief though it may be) of the scientific study of personality. The first is A. Heymans, a Dutch philosopher who almost single-handedly introduced the various theoretical, methodological and psychometric methods that characterise modern personality study (Eysenck, 1992). In the early years of this century, he put forward theories of specific personality dimensions, carried out rating studies on large numbers of subjects, correlated traits and devised a primitive method of factor analysis, derived factors that have stood the test of time (extraversion and neuroticism, to give them their modern names), and even went so far as to carry out psychological and physiological experiments to test deductions from these theories. As a reward for all this pioneering effort he is completely neglected in the modern literature; Hall et al (1985), in their Introduction to Theories of Personality gave much room to nonentities like Medard Boss, but make no mention of Heymans. He committed the ultimate crime of not being born in America, and must therefore be considered a non-person. Fortunately his theories and methodologies five on, largely in the London School.

Type
Books Reconsidered
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 165 , Issue 2 , August 1994 , pp. 278 - 280
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1994 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allport, G. (1937) Personality: A Psychological Interpretation. New York: Holt, Rinehard & Winston.Google Scholar
Allport, G. (1967) Autobiography. In A History of Psychology in Autobiography (vol. 5) (eds Boring, E.G. & Lindzey, S.). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1990) Rebel with a Cause. London: W.H. Allen.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1992) A Hundred Years of Personality Research, from Heymans to Modern Times. Amsterdam: Bohn Staflen van Loghun.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1993a) Differential psychology before and after William Stern. Psychologische Beitrage, 32, 249–262.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1993b) Creativity and personality: suggestions for a theory. Psychological Inquiry, 4, 147–178.Google Scholar
Grawe, K. (1992) Psychotherapieforschung zu Beginn der neunziger Jahre. Psychologische Rundschau, 43, 132–162.Google Scholar
Hall, C., Lindzey, G., Loehlin, J., et al (1985) Introduction of Theories of Personality. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Svartberg, M. & Stiles, T. C. (1991) Comparative effects of short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 704–714.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.