Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T05:49:07.077Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Author's reply

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2022

S. P. Sashidharan
S. P. Sashidharan*
Affiliation:
Independent Psychiatrist, UK. Email: s.p.sashidharan@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Reply
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 221 , Issue 6 , December 2022 , pp. 766
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists

17 May 2022

My articleReference Sashidharan1 was about the political threats facing, arguably, one of the best mental health services in the world and not about use of ECT. In this context, it is specious and misleading for Dr Braithwaite to suggest that Trieste's services somehow fall short of providing effective, humane and person-centred care because ECT is not part of routine clinical practice. This is not unique to Trieste; there are many mental health services and psychiatrists, including in the UK, that do not use ECT. There are others that use it frequently and routinely. This, by itself, does not mean that patients are being deprived of an effective treatment or that they are subject to treatment they may not need. It is perverse to suggest otherwise and to imply that the use of ECT should be considered as a hallmark of good mental healthcare.

Apart from offering the usual paean of praise for ECT, Dr Braithwaite does not provide any evidence which indicates that people in Trieste are being deprived of effective treatment or appropriate care. I am not aware of any clinical evidence of this, nor of any concerns raised by anyone familiar with Triste's mental health services at any time or in any literature relating to the remarkable achievements of the mental health reforms in Trieste over the past 40 years. If Dr Braithwaite has evidence to the contrary, he should present it rather than resorting to a strawman fallacy. The question is not why ECT is not used in Trieste but why there been no need to use ECT in Trieste in the past 40 years.

It is depressing to see the continuing antipathy towards Trieste within British psychiatry. Our rejection of Trieste has never been based on facts or on a detailed understanding of mental healthcare there and its ethos and culture. Dr Braithwaite's comments are in keeping with this, but I am glad that such attempts to discredit Trieste are increasingly at odds with the growing recognition of the value and long-term benefits of the key components of the Trieste model of mental healthcare.Reference Insel2

Declaration of interest

None

References

Sashidharan, SP. Why Trieste matters. Br J Psychiatry 2022; 220: 52–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Insel, T. Healing: Our Path from Mental Illness to Mental Health. Penguin, 2022.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.