Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T20:22:36.170Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

British Policies on Opiate Addiction

Ten Years Working of the Revised Response, and Options for the Future

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

Griffith Edwards
Griffith Edwards*
Affiliation:
Addiction Research Unit, Institute of Psychiatry, 101 Denmark Hill, London, S.E.5
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is now ten years since the Drug Clinics were set up. In the early 1960's a long established equilibrium broke down, and the number of narcotic addicts known to the Home Office began to rise steeply. The new addicts were predominantly in their early 20's, and drugs were being obtained either from the over-generous prescribing of a handful of doctors or from the spill-over of this prescribing to the black market (Bewley, 1965 (1), 1966 (2)). Heroin was the essential agent of this epidemic, with cocaine as the major ancillary.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 134 , Issue 1 , January 1979 , pp. 1 - 13
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Bewley, T. H. (1965) Heroin and cocaine addiction. Lancet, i, 808–10.Google Scholar
2 Bewley, T. H. (1966) Recent changes in the pattern of drug abuse in the United Kingdom. Bulletin of Narcotics, 18, 1–13.Google Scholar
3 Interdepartmental Committee (1965) The Second Report of the Interdepartmental Committee. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
4 Stimson, G. V. (1973) Heroin and Behaviour. Shannon: Irish University Press.Google Scholar
5 Connell, P. H. (1969) Drug dependence in Great Britain: a challenge to the practice of medicine. In: Steinberg, H. (ed.). Scientific Basis of Drug Dependence. London: Churchill.Google Scholar
6 Smart, R. G. & Ogborne, A. (1974) Losses to the addiction notification system. British Journal of Addiction, 69, 225–30.Google Scholar
7 Blumbero, H. H., Cohen, S. D., Dronfield, B. E., Mordecai, E. A., Roberts, J. C. & Hawks, D. (1974a) British opiate users: I. People approaching London drug treatment centres. International Journal of Addictions, 9, 1–23.Google Scholar
8 Ghodse, A. H. (1977) Casualty departments and the monitoring of drug dependence. British Medical Journal, i, 1381–2.Google Scholar
9 Arroyave, F., Little, D., Letenendia, F. & De Alarcon, R. (1973) Misuse of heroin and methadone in the City of Oxford. British Journal of Addiction, 68, 129–35.Google Scholar
10 Blumberg, H. H. & Dronfield, B. E. (1976) Nomination techniques in the study of largely invisible groups: opiate users not at drug dependence clinics. Social Science and Medicine, 10, 415–22.Google Scholar
11 Grimes, J. A. (1977) Drug Dependence Study: A Survey of Drug Addicts Attending for Treatment. Department of Health and Society Security.Google Scholar
12 Gardner, R. (1973) Deaths in the United Kingdom of opiate users. Lancet, ii, 560–653.Google Scholar
13 Ghodse, A. H. (1978) Personal communication.Google Scholar
14 Stimson, G. V., Oppenheimer, E. & Thorley, A. (1978) Seven year follow-up of heroin addicts: current drug use and basic outcome. British Medical Journal (forthcoming).Google Scholar
15 Blumberg, H. H., Cohen, S. D., Dronfield, B. E., Mordecai, E. A., Roberts, J. C. & Hawks, D. (1974b) British opiate users: II. Differences between those given an opiate script, and those not given one. International Journal of Addictions, 9, 205–20.Google Scholar
16 Ghodse, A. H. (1977) Drug dependent individuals dealt with by London Casualty Departments. British Journal of Psychiatry, 131, 273–80.Google Scholar
17 De Alarcon, R. (1972) An epidemiological evaluation of a public health measure at reducing the availability of methylamphetamine. Psychological Medicine, 2, 293–300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18 Advisory Committee (1970) Powers of Arrest and Search in Relation to Drug Offences. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
19 Hawks, D. (1973) The evaluation of measures to deal with drug dependence in the United Kingdom. In: Proceedings of the Anglo-American Conference on Drug Abuse. London: Royal Society of Medicine.Google Scholar
20 Blumberg, H. H. (1976) British users of opiate-type drugs: a follow-up study. British Journal of Addiction, 71, 65–77.Google ScholarPubMed
21 Gardner, R. & Connell, P. H. (1970) One year's experience in a drug clinic. Lancet, ii, 455–9.Google Scholar
22 Mitcheson, M., Edwards, G., Hawks, D. & Ogborne, A. (1976) Treatment of methylamphetamine users during the 1968 epidemic. In: Edwards, G., Russell, M. A. H., Hawks, D. and MacCafferty, M. (eds.). Drugs and Drug Dependence. Farnborough: Saxon House.Google Scholar
23 Thorley, A., Oppenheimer, R. & Stimson, G. V. (1977) Clinic attendance and opiate prescription status of heroin addicts over a six-year period. British Journal of Psychiatry, 130, 565–9.Google Scholar
24 Thorley, A. (1979) What assumptions might underly follow-up studies? In: Forthcoming Report to World Health Organization. Google Scholar
25 Lancet (1968) Addiction New Style (Editorial). Lancet, i, 852–3.Google Scholar
26 Dole, V. P. & Nyswander, M. (1965) A medical treatment for diacelylmorphine (heroin) addiction. Journal of the American Medical Association, 193, 646–50.Google Scholar
27 Departmental Committee (1926) Report of the Departmental Committee on Drug Dependence. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
28 Mellotte, C. (1975) A rehabilitation hostel for drug users: one year's admissions. British Journal of Criminology, 15, 376–85.Google Scholar
29 Hartnoll, D. (1972) The addict in jail. Drugs and Society, 1, 10–12.Google Scholar
30 Connell, P. H. (1968) The Drug Dependence Clinical Research and Treatment Unit. Bethlem and Maudsley Gazette, 9, 48. London: Maudsley Hospital.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.