Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T05:27:29.351Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Effects of Low Level DC Scalp Positive and Negative Current on the Performance of Various Tasks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

Karyl M. Hall
Affiliation:
Research Department, Agnews State Hospital
Robert A. Hicks
Affiliation:
San Jose State College
H. Kenneth Hopkins
Affiliation:
Research Department, Agnews State Hospital

Extract

Recently increased interest has been shown in the physiological and behavioural consequences of DC polarization of the brain.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1970 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bindman, L. J., Lippold, O. C., and Redfearn, J. W. (1962). ‘Long-lasting changes in the level of the electric activity of the cerebral cortex produced by polarizing currents.’ Nature, 196, 584–5.Google Scholar
Bishop, G. H., and O'Leary, J. L. (1950). ‘The effects of polarizing currents on cell potentials and their significance in the interpretation of central nervous system activity.’ EEG and Clinical Neurophysiology, 2, 410–16.Google Scholar
Costain, R., Redfearn, J. W., and Lippold, O. G. (1964). ‘A controlled trial of the therapeutic effects of polarization of the brain in depressive illness.’ British Journal of Psychiatry, 110, 786–99.Google Scholar
Ervin, F. R., Aronow, S., and Mark, V. H. (1967). ‘Low level dc polarization in man: clinical behavior and electrophysiological observation.’ Paper read at the Conference of Effects of Diffuse Electrical Currents on Physiological Mechanisms, October, 1967, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Haider, M., Spong, P., and Lindsley, D. (1964). ‘Attention, vigilance and cortical evoked potentials in humans.’ Science, 145, 180–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hillyard, S. A., and Galambos, R. (1967). ‘Effects of stimulus and response contingencies on a surface negative slow potential shift in man.’ EEG Clinical Neurophysiology, 22, 297304.Google Scholar
Lippold, O. C., and Redfearn, J. W. (1964). ‘Mental changes resulting from the passage of small direct currents through the human brain.’ British Journal of Psychiatry, 110, 768–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lippold, O. C., Redfearn, J. W., and Winton, L. J. (1961). ‘The potential level at the surface of the cerebral cortex of the rat and its relation to the cortical activity evoked by sensory stimulation.’ Journal of Physiology, 157, 79.Google Scholar
Rappaport, M. (1965). ‘Signal detection in schizophrenic and normal subjects.’ Unpublished manuscript, Agnews State Hospital, San Jose, California.Google Scholar
Redfearn, J. W., Lippold, O. C, and Costain, R. (1964). ‘A preliminary account of the clinical effects of polarizing the brain in certain psychiatric disorders.’ British Journal of Psychiatry, 110, 773–85.Google Scholar
Sheffield, L. J., and Mowbray, R. M. (1968). ‘The effects of polarization of normal subjects.’ British Journal of Psychiatry, 114, 225–32.Google Scholar
Thompson, R. F. (1967). Foundations of Physiological Psychology. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.