Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T07:21:26.591Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Follow-up Study of Accident Neurosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

Michael J. Tarsh  and
Claire Royston
Michael J. Tarsh
Affiliation:
Salford Health Authority, Hope Hospital, Salford, M6 8HD
Claire Royston
Affiliation:
Ormskirk District Hospital, Lancashire
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Thirty five claimants with accident neurosis, in which there were gross perplexing somatic symptoms without demonstrable organic pathology were traced and followed-up in their homes, from one to seven years after compensation was received. Few claimants recovered and such recovery as did take place was unrelated to the time of compensation. Family processes leading to over-protection by relatives were examined and appeared to be vitally important in the prolongation of symptoms. The legal process and the delays involved caused great distress.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 146 , Issue 1 , January 1985 , pp. 18 - 25
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balla, J. I. & Moraitis, S. L. (1970) Knights in Armour - A follow-up study of injuries after legal settlement. Medical Journal of Australia, 2, 355–361.Google Scholar
Cole, E. S. (1970) Psychiatric aspects of compensable injury. Medical Journal of Australia, i, 93–100.Google Scholar
Ellard, J. (1974) Being sick and getting better. Medical Journal of Australia, i, 867–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guthkelch, A. N. (1980) Post-traumatic amnesia, post-concussional symptoms and accident neurosis. European Neurology, 19, 91–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, R. (1975) The post-traumatic syndrome: an iatrogenic disease. Forensic Science, 6, 17–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelly, R. (1981) The post-traumatic syndrome. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 74, 242–244.Google Scholar
Kelly, R. & Smith, B. N. (1981) Post-traumatic syndrome - another myth discredited. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 74, 275–277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawton, F. (1979) A judicial view of traumatic neurosis. Medico-Legal Journal, 47, 6–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mendelson, G. (1982) Not “cured by a verdict” - effect of legal settlement on compensation claimants. Medical Journal of Australia, 2, 132–134.Google Scholar
Miller, H. (1961) Accident neurosis. British Medical Journal, 919–925, 992–998.Google Scholar
Parker, N. (1970) Accident neurosis. Medical Journal of Australia, 2, 362–365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pearson Commission (1978) Royal commission on civil liability - and compensation for personal injury. HMSO publication no. 7054/123.Google Scholar
Rickarby, G. A. (1979) Compensation neurosis and the psychosocial requirement of the family. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 52, 333–338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Teusch, L. (1982) What does the facade of a compensation neurosis conceal? Medijinische Klinik, 77, 730–732.Google Scholar
Weighill, V. E. (1983) Compensation neurosis - a review of the literature. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 27, 97–104.Google Scholar
Woodyard, J. E. (1980) Injury compensation claims and prognosis. Journal of the Society of Occupational Medicine, 30, 2–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woodyard, J. E. (1982) Diagnosis and prognosis in compensation claims. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 64, 191–193.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.