Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T05:29:15.279Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Home-Based Care and Standard Hospital Care for Patients with Severe Mental Illness: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

C. J. Simpson ,
C. P. Seager  and
J. A. Robertson
C. J. Simpson
Affiliation:
Friarage Hospital, Northallerton, North Yorkshire DL6 1JG
C. P. Seager
Affiliation:
NHS Health Advisory Service, 11 Haugh Lane, Sheffield S11 9SA
J. A. Robertson
Affiliation:
Kidderminster General Hospital, Bewdley Road, Kidderminster, Worcester DY11 6RJ
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

To compare the efficacy of home based care with standard hospital care in treating serious mental illness.

Design

Randomised controlled trial.

Setting

South Southwark, London.

Patients

189 patients aged 18–64 living in catchment area. 92 were randomised to home based care (daily living programme) and 97 to standard hospital care. At three months' follow up 68 home care and 60 hospital patients were evaluated.

Main outcome measures

Use of hospital beds, psychiatric diagnosis, social functioning, patients' and relatives' satisfaction, and activity of daily living programme staff.

Results

Home care reduced hospital stay by 80% (median stay 6 days in home care group, 53 days in hospital group) and did not increase the number of admissions compared with hospital care. On clinical and social outcome there was a non–significant trend in favour of home care, but both groups showed big improvements. On the global adjustment scale home care patients improved by 26.8 points and the hospital group by 21.6 points (difference 5.2; 95% confidence interval -1.5 to 12). Other rating scales showed similar trends. Home care patients required a wide range of support in areas such as housing, finance, and work. Only three patients dropped out from the programme.

Conclusions

Home based care may offer some slight advantages over hospital based care for patients with serious mental illness and their relatives. The care is intensive, but the low drop out rate suggests appreciation. Changes to traditional training for mental health workers are required.

Type
The Current Literature
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 162 , Issue 2 , February 1993 , pp. 239 - 243
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1993 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Creed, F., Black, D., Anthony, P., et al (1991) Randomised controlled trial of day and in-patient psychiatric treatment. 2: Comparison of two hospitals. British Journal of Psychiatry, 158, 183–189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoult, J. (1986) Community care of the acutely mentally ill. British Journal of Psychiatry, 149, 137–144.Google Scholar
Muijen, M., Marks, I., Connolly, J., et al (1992) Home based care and standard hospital care for patients with severe mental illness: a randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal, 304, 749–754.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stein, L. & Test, M. (1980) Alternative to mental hospital treatment: 1. Conceptual model, treatment programme and evaluation. Archives of General Psychiatry, 37, 392–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wooff, K., Goldberg, D. P. & Fryers, T. (1988) The practice of community psychiatric nursing and mental health social work in Salford - some implications for community care. British Journal of Psychiatry, 152, 783–792.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.