Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T10:44:23.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Predictability of Speech in Schizophrenic Patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

D. R. Rutter
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL
J. Wishner
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, USA
Hanka Kopytynska
Affiliation:
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford
Mary Button
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Nottingham

Summary

Previous research has suggested that schizophrenic speech is less predictable than normal speech. Two experiments designed to test the suggestion are reported, both of them based on Cloze Procedure. In the first, raters were asked to predict ten passages of schizophrenic speech and ten passages of normal speech under fourth-word deletion. No difference between the two types of passage was found. In the second, a modified form of presentation was introduced which prevented raters making use of the text which follows a blank. Once again, no difference was revealed between the schizophrenic and normal passages, and this was true for both the new and traditional forms of presentation, and for both fourth-word and fifth-word deletion patterns. The investigation is discussed in the light of previous findings, and a number of suggestions concerning methodology and forms of analysis are made for future research.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1978 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cheek, F. & Amarel, M. (1968) Studies in the sources of variation in Cloze scores: II. The verbal passages. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 73, 424–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooper, J. E., Kendell, R. E., Gurland, B. J., Sharpe, L., Copeland, J. R. M. & Simon, R. (1972) Psychiatric Diagnosis in New York and London. Maudsley Monograph No. 20. London: Oxford University Press Google Scholar
Fries, C. C. (1952) The Structure of English. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hart, D. S. & Payne, R. W. (1973) Language structure and predictability in overinclusive patients. British Journal of Psychiatry, 123, 643–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rutter, D. R., Draffan, J. & Davies, J. (1977) Thought disorder and the predictability of schizophrenic speech. British Journal of Psychiatry, 131, 67–8.Google Scholar
Rutter, D. R., Wishner, J. & Callaghan, B. A. (1975) The prediction and predictability of speech in schizophrenic patients. British Journal of Psychiatry, 126, 571–6.Google Scholar
Salzinger, K., Portnoy, S. & Feldman, R. S. (1964) Verbal behaviour of schizophrenic and normal subjects. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 105, 845–60.Google Scholar
Salzinger, K., Portnoy, S., Pisoni, D. B. & Feldman, R. S. (1970) The immediacy hypothesis and response-produced stimuli in schizophrenic speech. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 76, 258–64.Google Scholar
Silverman, G. (1972) Psycholinguistics of schizophrenic language. Psychological Medicine, 2, 254–9.Google Scholar
Taylor, W. L. (1953) ‘Cloze Procedure’: a new tool for measuring readability. Journalism Quarterly, 30, 415–33.Google Scholar
Winer, B. J. (1970) Statistical Principles in Experimental Design. London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.