Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T20:08:45.413Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reports of the death of factor analysis are greatly exaggerated

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Chris Evans ,
Bridget Dolan  and
Dette Lynch
Chris Evans
Affiliation:
Section of Forensic Psychiatry
Bridget Dolan
Affiliation:
Section of Biostatistics, St George's Hospital Medical School, Jenner Wing, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 ORE
Dette Lynch
Affiliation:
Section of Biostatistics, St George's Hospital Medical School, Jenner Wing, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 ORE
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Columns
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 161 , Issue 2 , August 1992 , pp. 272 - 273
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

References

McDonald, R. P. (1965) Difficulty factors and non-linear factor analysis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 18, 11–23.Google Scholar
McDonald, R. P. (1981) The dimensionality of tests and items. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 34, 100–117.Google Scholar
McDonald, R. P. (1982) Linear versus nonlinear models in item response theory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 6, 379–396.Google Scholar
McDonald, R. P. & Ahlawat, K. S. (1974) Difficulty factors in binary data. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 27, 82–99.Google Scholar
Zwick, W. R. & Velicer, W. F. (1986) Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 432–442.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.