Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T06:01:57.243Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sibship Size and Mental Illness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

John Birtchnell
John Birtchnell*
Affiliation:
Medical Research Council, M.R.C. Clinical Psychiatry Research Unity Graylingwell Hospital, Chichester, Sussex; formerly Department of Mental Health, University of Aberdeen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Though there have been many investigations concerned with sibling order and mental illness there have been relatively few concerned with sibship size. The abundance of sibling order studies is probably due to the widely accepted belief that in such studies comparison with general population data is not necessary. Expected numbers within each birth rank are estimated by the Greenwood-Yule method, proposed in 1914, by which it is assumed that for any given size of sibship siblings should be evenly distributed among birth ranks. In the present population, in which family size has in recent years been decreasing, this assumption is clearly invalid, for the younger members of the larger families of earlier years are more likely to be included in a contemporary sample, the older members by now having died. Other factors influencing sibling position have been more fully discussed by Price and Hare (1969). Thus comparison with general population figures is necessary in sibling order studies, and a report on such a comparison will be published separately by the author.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 117 , Issue 538 , September 1970 , pp. 303 - 308
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1970 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, A. (1928). Understanding Human Nature, trans. Wolfe, W. B. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Baldwin, J. A., Innes, G., Millar, W. M., Sharp, G. A., and Dorricott, N. (1965). ‘A psychiatric case register in North-Eastern Scotland.’ Brit. J. prev. soc. Med., 19, 38–42.Google Scholar
Berg, I., Fearnley, W., Paterson, M., Pollock, G., and Vallance, R. (1967). ‘Birth order and family size of approved school boys.’ Brit. J. Psychiat., 113, 793–800.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brill, A. A. (1922). Psychoanalysis—Its Theories and Practical Application. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders.Google Scholar
Glueck, S., and Glueck, E. (1950). Unravelling Juvenile Delinquency. Harvard University.Google Scholar
Goldberg, E. M., and Morrison, S. L. (1963). ‘Schizophrenia and social class.’ Brit. J. Psychiat., 109, 786–802.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenwood, M., and Yule, G. U. (1914). ‘On the determination of size of family and of the distribution of characters in order of birth from samples taken through members of sibship.’ J. Roy. statist. Soc., 77, 179–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, I. (1958). ‘An analysis of familial data on psychiatric patients: parental age, family size, birth order, and ordinal position.’ Brit. J. prev. soc. Med., 12, 42–59.Google Scholar
Hare, E. H., and Shaw, G. K. (1965). ‘A study in family health: (i) health in relation to family size.’ Brit. J. Psychiat., 111, 461–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ingham, H. V. (1949). ‘A statistical study of family relationships in psychoneurosis.’ Amer. J. Psychiat., 106, 91–8.Google Scholar
Price, J., and Hare, E. (1969). ‘Birth order studies: some sources of bias.’ Brit. J. Psychiat., 115, 633–46.Google Scholar
Smart, R. G. (1963). ‘Alcoholism, birth order and family size.’ J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 66, 17–23.Google Scholar
Stein, L. (1960). ‘Morbidity in a London general practice. Social and demographic data.’ Brit. J. prev. soc. Med., 14, 9–15.Google Scholar
Vogel, W., and Lauterbach, C. G. (1963). ‘Sibling patterns and social adjustment among normal and psychiatrically disturbed soldiers.’ J. cons. Psychol., 27, 236–42.Google Scholar
Wahl, C. W. (1954). ‘Some antecedent factors in the family histories of 392 schizophrenics.’ Amer. J. Psychiat., 110, 668–80.Google Scholar
Wexberg, E. (1930). Individual Psychology, trans. Wolfe, W. B. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.