Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:08:01.620Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Two Faces of Emil Kraepelin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Michael Shepherd
Michael Shepherd*
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, London SE5 8AF
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Eponymous lecturers are expected to make some reference to the person in whose name the lecture is being delivered. In this case my task has been facilitated by the fact that the first Mapother lecture was devoted to Edward Mapother himself. It was given by his successor, Sir Aubrey Lewis, who, as was his wont, furnished a comprehensive account of his subject, demonstrating how this remarkable man laid the foundations of the institution to which he devoted his professional life. Lewis's lecture, entitled “Edward Mapother and the Making of the Maudsley Hospital” (Lewis, 1969), provides a link with this one via the mention of the visit paid by Frederick Mott in 1909 to Emil Kraepelin's Forschungsanstalt in Munich, where he was so impressed by what he saw that he resolved to use Henry Maudsley's bequest to found a corresponding institution in this country. Edward Mapother was to assume a major responsibility for this large enterprise which he justified as follows:

“The only hope for the sort of dispassionate long-term research which psychiatry needs, is the creation of teams of career investigators … most of whom should not be primarily psychiatrists at all, but real experts in various branches of science, who have brought its technique to the service of psychiatry and then received enough training in this to enable them to see its problems … Then we should get progress, not pot-boiling.”

Type
Papers
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 167 , Issue 2 , August 1995 , pp. 174 - 183
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brink, L. & Jolliffe, S. E. (1932) Emil Kraepelin, psychiatrist and poet. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 66, 274–282.Google Scholar
Bumke, O. (1993) The dissolution of dementia praecox, translated by Per Halen. History of Psychiatry, 4, 133–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crow, T. J. (1987) Psychosis as a continuum and the virogenic concept. British Medical Bulletin, 43, 754–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hippius, H., Peters, G. & Ploog, D. (1987) Foreword. In Memoirs by Emil Kraepelin (transi. Wooding-Deane, C.), p. XI. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Hoche, A. (1991) The significance of symptom complexes in psychiatry (transi. Dening, R. G. & Dening, T. R.). History of Psychiatry, 2, 334–343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jablensky, A., Hagler, H., von Cranach, M., et al (1993) Kraepelin revisited: a reassessment and statistical analysis of dementia praecox and manic-depressive insanity in 1908. Psychological Medicine, 23, 848–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaspers, K. (1963) General Psychopathology (transi. Hoenig, J. & Hamilton, M. W.), p. 591. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Kraepelin, E. (1906/7) Verbrechen als soziale Krankheit. Monatschrift K/S, 258–265.Google Scholar
Kraepelin, E. (1921) Bismarcks Persönlichkeit. Ungedrukte persönliche Erinnerungen. Süddeutsche Monatshefte, 19, 105–122.Google Scholar
Kraepelin, E. (1922a) Ends and means of psychiatric research, translated by Sydney J. Cole. The Journal of Mental Science, LXVIII, 115–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraepelin, E. (1922b) German Research Institute. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 56, 209–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraepelin, E. (1962) One Hundred Years of Psychiatry (transi. Baskin, W.), pp. 107–108. New York: The Citadel Press.Google Scholar
Kraepelin, E. (1974) Patterns of mental disorder (transi. Marshall, H.). In Themes and Variations in European Psychiatry (eds Hirsch, S. R. & Shepherd, M.), pp. 7–30. Bristol: John Wright.Google Scholar
Kraepelin, E. (1987) Memoirs (transi. Wooding-Deane, C.). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraepelin, E. (1992) Psychiatric observations on contemporary issues (transi. Engstrom, E. J.). History of Psychiatry, 3, 259–269.Google ScholarPubMed
Lewis, A. (1969) Edward Mapother and the making of the Maudsley Hospital. British Journal of Psychiatry, 115, 1349–1366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, A. (1991) Dilemmas in psychiatry. Psychological Medicine, 581–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, A. (1922) Constructive formulation of schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry, 1, 355–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slater, E. & Roth, M. (1969) Clinical Psychiatry, 3rd edition, p. 10. Baillière, Tindall and Cassell.Google Scholar
Stern, F. (1986) Analysts without resistance: psychotherapy and psychologists under National Socialism. New York Review of Books, 25, 172–190.Google Scholar
Taylor, A. J. P. (1955) Bismarck. London: Hamish Hamilton.Google Scholar
Weindling, P. (1989) Health, Race and German Politics between National Unification and Nazism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wernicke, C. (1906) Fundamentals of Psychiatry. Leipzig: Thieme.Google Scholar
Zilboorg, G. (1941) A History of Medical Psychology, pp. 434–435. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Zubin, J. (1987) Closing Comments. In Search for the Causes of Schizophrenia (eds Häfner, H., Gattaz, W. F. & Janzarik, W.), p. 359. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.