Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-05T01:03:55.182Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kinesics and Performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2021

Richard Schechner  and
Cynthia Mintz
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

At least as far back as Darwin's The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals(1872) scientists have studied analogic (as distinct from digital) modes of communication. Clearly all artists other than writers are technicians of the analogic.

Analogic codification constitutes a series of symbols that in their proportions and relations are similar to the thing, idea, or event for which they stand. […] Such a form of codification deals with continuous functions, unlike digital codification, which deals with discrete step intervals. […] The principles of analogic codification as contrasted with digital codification have a central importance to students of human behavior that is still perhaps insufficiently understood. The use of words, whether in speech or writing, has certain limitations akin to those of digital computers: words remain identifying or typifying symbols that lack the impelling immediacy of analogic devices.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Drama Review , Volume 17 , Issue 3: Theatre and the Social Sciences , September 1973 , pp. 102 - 108
Copyright
Copyright © 1973 The Drama Review

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Ruesch and Kees (1972), 8.

2 Kirby (1973), 10.

3 A survey of current thinking in the field is contained in a special issue of Scientific American, Vol. 227, No. 3 (Sept., 1972), devoted to communication.

4 Birdwhistell (1964), 2.

5 Kirby (1973), 28.

6 Birdwhistell (1952), 17.