Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T04:24:34.649Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Labour, Commodities and the Labour Market: A Heterodox Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

Graham White
Graham White*
Affiliation:
Discipline of Economics, University of Sydney
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The article sheds light on the proposition that labour is a commodity by considering from a fundamental theoretical perspective whether labour is subject to the same market forces which apply to commodities in general in capitalist economies. It suggests that no spontaneous competitive force exists within capitalism that would adjust labour demand to its supply, in contrast to the adaptation of supply to the demand for commodities in general. This result is argued without reference to assumptions about inflexibilities or impediments in labour or other markets, or institutional features peculiar to ‘the labour market’. Its explanation of why labour markets do not clear is at odds with a core tenet underlying orthodox economic theory of the last century, which has acted as a fundamental benchmark for most theorising about labour to the present day. Rejection of this tenet is at the heart of a heterodox explanation of unemployment, the real wage and income distribution in capitalist economies.

Keywords

General aggregative models — SraffianPost-Keynesianemploymentunemploymentreal wagescompensation and labour costsB22E11E24J3
Type
Mini-Symposium: The Labour-as-Commodity Debate
Information
The Economic and Labour Relations Review , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , October 2010 , pp. 89 - 104
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2010

References

Eatwell, J. (1983a) ‘Theories of value, output and employment’, in Eatwell, J. and Milgate, M. (eds) Keynes’s Economics and the Theory of Value and Distribution, Duckworth, London, pp. 93–128.Google Scholar
Eatwell, J. (1983b) ‘The analytical foundations of monetarism’, in Eatwell, J. and Milgate, M. (eds) Keynes’s Economics and the Theory of Value and Distribution, Duckworth, London, pp. 203–213.Google Scholar
Eatwell, J. (1995) Disguised unemployment: The G7 experience Discussion Papers , No. 106, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Geneva.Google Scholar
Falk, A. and Gächter, S. (2008) ‘Experimental labour economics’, in Durlauf, S. and Blume, L. (eds) The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, available: http://www.dictionaryofeconomics.com/article?id=pde2008_E000276.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. B. (1987) ‘Labour economics’, in Eatwell, J., Milgate, M. and Newman, P. (eds) The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, Macmillan, London, First edition, pp. 73–76.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. B. (2005) ‘Labour market institutions without blinders: The debate over flexibility and labour market performance’, NBER Working Paper Series, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge MA, No. 11286, April.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garegnani, P. (1978) ‘Notes on consumption, investment and effective demand’, Part I, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2 (4), pp. 335–353.Google Scholar
Garegnani, P. (1979) ‘Notes on consumption, investment and effective demand’, Part II, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 3 (1), pp. 63–82.Google Scholar
Garegnani, P. (1990) ‘Classical versus marginalist analysis’, in Bharadwaj, K. and Schefold, B. (eds) Essays on Piero Sraffa: Critical Perspectives on the Revival of Classical Theory, Unwin Hyman, London, pp. 112–141.Google Scholar
Kalecki, M. (1943) ‘Political aspects of full employment’, Political Quarterly, 14 (4), pp. 322–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keynes, J. M. (1936), The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Kurz, H. and Salvadori, N. (1996), The Theory of Production: A Long-Period Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK.Google Scholar
Mankiw, N. and Romer, D. (1991) ‘Introduction’, in Mankiw, N. and Romer, D. (eds) New Keynesian Economics, MIT Press, Cambridge MA, Vol. 1, pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
Mongiovi, G. (1991) ‘Keynes, Sraffa and the labour market’, Review of Political Economy, 3 (1), pp. 25–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogerson, R., Shimer, R. and Wright, R. (2005) ‘Search-theoretic models of the labor market: A survey’, Journal of Economic Literature, 43 (4), pp. 959–988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taber, C. and Weinberg, B. (2008) ‘Labour economics (New perspectives)’ in Durlauf, S. N. and Blume, L. E. (eds) The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, Palgrave Macmillan, available: http://www.dictionaryofeconomics.com/article?id=pde2008_L000241 [accessed 10 October 2010].Google Scholar
Sraffa, P. (1960), Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
White, G. (2004) ‘Capital, distribution and macroeconomics: “Core” beliefs and theoretical foundations’, Cambridge Journal of Economics 28 (4), pp. 527–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Symposium (1997) ‘Is there a core of practical macroeconomics that we should all believe?’, American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings 87 (2), pp. 230–246.Google Scholar