Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T12:12:06.315Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Labour as a (Fictitious) Commodity: Polanyi and the Capitalist ‘Market Economy’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

Joy Paton
Joy Paton*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Economy, University of Sydney
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In The Great Transformation, Karl Polanyi problematised the commodity status of labour. He described it as ‘fictitious’ and asserted the human aspect of labour necessitates ‘protection’. In bringing Polanyi’s mature works to bear on these claims, this article uses the ‘fictitious commodity’ concept to highlight the tension in neoclassical theory between concrete reality and its idealist construction of the economy. This contradiction directly challenges the veracity of the self-regulating market. The article develops two related themes. The first is Polanyi’s critique of the neoclassical conception of ‘the economy’ as an ideal (market) construct which gave rise to the notion that labour could be regulated by the forces of supply and demand. The second is the lack of logic in the notion of a ‘self regulating’ market and Polanyi’s appreciation of the concrete tendencies of capitalist economies to develop institutional arrangements that ensure the economy is always, and necessarily, more than ‘the market’.

Keywords

Capitalist economyfictitious commodityinstitutionalisationKarl Polanyilaissez fairelabourmarketsregulationself-regulationsocial embeddednessB25B31B52
Type
Mini-Symposium: The Labour-as-Commodity Debate
Information
The Economic and Labour Relations Review , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , October 2010 , pp. 77 - 87
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2010

References

Block, F. (ed.) (2001) ‘Introduction’ in The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of our Time, Beacon Press, Boston, Second edition.Google Scholar
Dalton, G. (1990) ‘Writings that clarify theoretical disputes over Karl Polanyi’s work’, Journal of Economic Issues, 24 (1), pp. 249–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, M. (1991), The Constitution of Poverty: Toward a Genealogy of Liberal Governance, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Dow, G. (2006) ‘The labour market and labour market “reform”’, Journal of Australian Political Economy, 57, pp. 137–154.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1991) ‘Governmentality’, in Burchell, G., Gordon, C. and Miller, P. (eds) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Menger, C. (1950 [1871]) The Principles of Economics: First, General Part, Translated by Dingwall, J. and Hoselitz, B. F. (eds) The Free Press, Glencoe, Illinois.Google Scholar
Oxley, G. W. (1974) Poor Relief in England and Wales 1601–1834, Newton Abbot, North Pomfret U.K. Google Scholar
Pateman, C. (1988), The Sexual Contract, Polity Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Peck, J. (1996), Work-place: The Social Regulation of Labour Markets, The Guilford Press, New York.Google Scholar
Polanyi, K. (1944), The Great Transformation, Farrar and Rinehart, New York.Google Scholar
Polanyi, K. (1947) ‘Our obsolete market mentality’ in Dalton, G. (ed.) (1968) Primitive, Archaic, and Modern Economies: Essays of Karl Polanyi, Doubleday, New York, pp. 59–77.Google Scholar
Polanyi, K. (1957) ‘The economy as instituted process’ in Polanyi, K., Arensberg, C. M. and Pearson, H. W. (eds) Trade and Market in the Early Empires: Economies in History and Theory, The Free Press, New York, pp. 243–270.Google Scholar
Polanyi, K. (1971) ‘Carl Menger’s two meanings of “economic”’ in Dalton, G. (ed.) Studies in Economic Anthropology, American Anthropological Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Polanyi, K. (1977) The Livelihood of Man, Pearson, H. W. (ed.) Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Polanyi, K. (2001) The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of our Time, Beacon Press, Boston, Second edition.Google Scholar
Porter, R. (2000), Enlightenment: Britain and the Creation of the Modern World, Penguin, London.Google Scholar
Radin, M. J. (1996), Contested Commodities, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1904 [1776]) An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, Cannan, Edwin (ed.) Methuen and Co. Ltd, London, Fifth Edition, available: http://www.econlib.org/LIBRARY/Smith/smWN.html [accessed 20 February 2010].Google Scholar
Thompson, E. P. (1971) ‘The moral economy of the English crowd in the eighteenth century’, Past and Present, 50 (1), pp. 76–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townsend, J. (1971 [1786]) A Dissertation on the Poor Laws, University of California Press, Berkeley CA.Google Scholar