Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T02:30:27.754Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Robert Devreesse, Essai sur Théodore de Mopsueste (Studi e testi 141). Città del Vaticano, Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana, 1948. pp. vii, 439.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2017

Ernest Honigmann*
Affiliation:
Louvain

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © 1951 by Fordham University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Edited by Vosté, J. M., CSCO, Scr. Syri, ser. IV, t. III (1940).Google Scholar

2 Richard, M., “Acace de Mélitène, Proclus de Constantinople et la Grande Arménie,’ Mémorial Louis Petit (Bucharest 1948) 393412.Google Scholar

3 Cf. Devreesse's Index, p. 432, s.v. ‘Porphyre.’ Google Scholar

4 “The book of the bee,’ ed. Wallis Budge, E. A., Anecdota Oxoniensia, Semitic Series 2 (Oxford 1886) 151; transl. 132.Google Scholar

5 PO 4.379, 5.289.Google Scholar

6 St. Methodius, , Orat. in S. Thecl. 9 (PG 18.137A-B).Google Scholar

7 Basil. Seleuc. Mirac. S. Thecl. 16, 2427 (PG 85.608A ff.).Google Scholar

8 Cf. Gordon, C. H., “Azitawadd's Phoenician Inscription,’ Journal of Near-Easten Studies 8 (1949) 108115; Marcus, R. and Gelb, I. J., ‘The Phoenician Stele Inscription from Cilicia,’ ibid. 116-120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9 Cf. Tisserant, E., art. “Philoxène de Mabboug,’ DThC 12 (Paris 1935) 15121513.Google Scholar

10 See Schwartz, Eduard, “Publizistische Sammlungen zum acacianischen Schisma, Abhandl. Bayer. Akad. d. Wiss. N. F. 10 (1934) 240 n.6.Google Scholar

11 Op. cit. 297 Google Scholar

12 Severus Antiochen. Epist. 69 (PO 14.101 [271]).Google Scholar

13 On p. 42 the article by Abramowski, R., Zeitschrift f. d. neutestam. Wiss. 33 (1934) 6684 was perhaps worth mentioning.Google Scholar

14 I have noticed only the following: p. 220 ‘448’ instead of ‘548’; p. 133 n. 1 the word ‘quae illa’ should be deleted; p. 258 n. 2 and 429, Index s.v. ‘Jean Philopon,’ ‘Diatetes’ read ‘Diaetetes,’ as elsewhere correctly printed.Google Scholar